This editorial staff would have written scathing broadsides against Gen. Washington, Alex Hamilton, Patrick Henry, John Adams, et al.
They do serve a useful puropose though: just think and do the exact opposite of what they say and you will always be right.
Since I never read the slimes, is it common practice for them to just sign off on an editorial as "The Editors"? Or is it the fact that no one wants to take credit (or blame) for this nonsense?