Skip to comments."Intelligent Design": Stealth War on Science
Posted on 11/01/2005 6:27:26 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
A president who consults religious lunatics about who should be on the Supreme Court... Judges who want prayer in school and the "ten commandments" in the courtroom Born-Again fanatics who bomb abortion clinics bible thumpers who condemn homosexuality as "sin"... and all the other Christian fascists who want a U.S. theocracy .
This is the force behind the assault on evolution going on right now in a courtroom in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
Last year, the Dover city school board instituted a policy that requires high school biology teachers to read a statement to students that says Darwin's theory of evolution is "not a fact" and then notes that intelligent design offers an alternative theory for the origin and evolution of life--namely, that life in all of its complexity could not have arisen without the help of an "intelligent hand." Some teachers refused to read the statement, citing the Pennsylvania teacher code of ethics, which says, "I will never knowingly present false information to a student." Eleven parents who brought this case to court contend that the directive amounted to an attempt to inject religion into the curriculum in violation of the First Amendment. Their case has been joined by the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
The school board is being defended pro bono by the Thomas More Law Center, a Christian law firm in Ann Arbor, Mich. The case is being heard without a jury in Harrisburg by U.S. District Judge John Jones III, whom George W. Bush appointed to the bench in 2002.
In 1987, the Supreme Court ruled that public schools could not teach the biblical account of creation instead of evolution, because doing so would violate the constitutional ban on establishment of an official religion. Since then Intelligent Design has been promoted by Christian fundamentalists as the way to get the Bible and creationism into the schools.
"This clever tactical repackaging of creationism does not merit consideration," Witold Walczak, legal director of the Pennsylvania American Civil Liberties Union and a lawyer for the parents, told U.S. District Judge John E. Jones in opening arguments. "Intelligent design admits that it is not science unless science is redefined to include the supernatural." This is, he added, "a 21st-century version of creationism."
This is the first time a federal court has been asked to rule on the question of whether Intelligent Design is religion or science. Eugenie Scott, executive director of the National Center for Science Education, which opposes challenges to the standard model of teaching evolution in the schools, said the Pennsylvania case "is probably the most important legal situation of creation and evolution in the last 18 years," and that "it will have quite a significant impact on what happens in American public school education."
Proponents of Intelligent Design dont say in the courtroom that they want to replace science with religion. But their strategy papers, speeches, and discussions with each other make it clear this is their agenda.
Intelligent Design (ID) is basically a re-packaged version of creationism--the view that the world can be explained, not by science, but by a strict, literal reading of the Bible. ID doesnt bring up ridiculous biblical claims like the earth is only a few thousand years old or that the world was created in seven days. Instead it claims to be scientific--it acknowledges the complexity and diversity of life, but then says this all comes from some "intelligent" force. ID advocates dont always openly argue this "intelligent force" is GOD--they even say it could be some alien from outer space! But Christian fundamentalists are the driving force behind the whole Intelligent Design movement and its clear these people arent praying every night to little green men from another planet.
Phillip Johnson, considered the father and guiding light behind Intelligent Design, is the architect of the "wedge strategy" which focuses on attacking evolution and promoting intelligent design to ultimately, as Johnson says, "affirm the reality of God." Johnson has made it clear that the whole point of "shifting the debate from creationism vs. evolution to the existence of God vs. the non-existence of God" is to get people "introduced to the truth of the Bible," then "the question of sin" and finally "introduced to Jesus."
Intelligent Design and its theocratic program has been openly endorsed by George W. Bush. Earlier this year W stated that Intelligent Design should be taught in the schools. When he was governor of Texas, Bush said students should be exposed to both creationism and evolution. And he has made the incredibly unscientific, untrue statement that "the jury is still out" on evolution.
For the Christian fascists, the fight around evolution and teaching Intelligent Design is part of a whole agenda that encompasses reconfiguring all kinds of cultural, social, and political "norms" in society. This is a movement that is fueled by a religious vision which varies among its members but is predicated on the shared conviction that the United States is in need of drastic changes--which can only be accomplished by instituting religion as its cultural foundation.
The Christian fascists really do want--and are working for--a society where everything is run according to the Bible. They have been working for decades to infiltrate school boards to be in a position to mandate things like school prayer. Now, in the schools, they might not be able to impose a literal reading of the Bibles explanation for how the universe was created. But Intelligent Design, thinly disguised as some kind of "science," is getting a lot more than just a foot in the door.
The strategy for promoting intelligent design includes an aggressive and systematic agenda of promoting the whole religious worldview that is the basis for ID. And this assault on evolution is linked up with other questions in how society should be run.
Marc Looy of the creationist group Answers in Genesis has said that evolution being taught in the schools,
"creates a sense of purposelessness and hopelessness, which I think leads to things like pain, murder, and suicide."
Ken Cumming, dean of the Institute for Creation Research's (ICR) graduate school, who believes the earth is only thousands of years old, attacked a PBS special seven-part series on evolution, suggesting that the series had "much in common" with the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks against the United States. He said,
"[W]hile the public now understands from President Bush that 'we're at war' with religious fanatics around the world, they don't have a clue that America is being attacked from within through its public schools by a militant religious movement called Darwinists...."
After the 1999 school shooting in Littleton, Colorado, Tom DeLay, Christian fascist representative from Texas, gave a speech on the floor of the House of Representatives, blaming the incident in part on the teaching of evolution. He said,
"Our school systems teach the children that they are nothing but glorified apes who are evolutionized out of some primordial soup of mud."
The ID movement attacks the very notion of science itself and the philosophical concept of materialism--the very idea that there is a material world that human beings can examine, learn about, and change.
Johnson says in his "The Wedge Strategy" paper,
"The social consequences of materialism have been devastating we are convinced that in order to defeat materialism, we must cut it off at its source. Design theory promises to reverse the stifling dominance of the materialist world view, and to replace it with a science consonant with Christian and theistic convictions."
Dr. Eugenie C. Scott, the Executive Director of the National Center for Science Education, points out:
"Evolution is a concept that applies to all sciences, from astronomy to chemistry to geology to biology to anthropology. Attacking evolution means attacking much of what we know of the natural world, that we have amassed through the application of scientific principles and methods. Second, creationist attacks on evolution are attacks on science itself, because the creationist approach does violence to how we conduct science: science as a way of knowing."
The Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture (another Christian think tank) says that it "seeks nothing less than the overthrow of materialism and its cultural legacies."
Teaching Intelligent Design in the schools is part of a whole Christian Fascist movement in the United States that has power and prominence in the government, from the Bush regime on down. And if anyone isnt clear about what "cultural legacies" the Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture wants to overthrow--take a look at the larger Christian fascist agenda that the intelligent design movement is part of: asserting patriarchy in the home, condemning homosexuality, taking away the right to abortion, banning sex education, enforcing the death penalty with the biblical vengeance of an "eye for an eye," and launching a war because "God told me [Bush] to invade Iraq."
What a childish article.
Been watching this train-wreck coming for years.
Too bad you're on their side.
"From there, people are introduced to 'the truth' of the Bible and then 'the question of sin' and finally 'introduced to Jesus.'"
A slippery slope indeed. They make it sound like heroin.
The fear: "Don't talk to me about sin." But we're all sinners. Only the love of God can take it away. What a choice: do I deny my sin so I can continue to live with it? Or do I admit it and let it be removed?
The url in my browser appears to be FR?
If "losing" has anything to do with the forthing idiocy of this article, I can't wait to find out what socialist "rationality" is all about.
When the science of something becomes unchallengeable dogma, then it can be said society is hostile to the scientific method. So whose version of how and why we are here is unchallengeable, and who then is really at war with science?
While I am a supporter of intelligent design, if it is true that teachers were required to read some statement to their students, then I would oppose that.
I would oppose forcing them to read any kind of statement (other than administrative school functions, etc.) regarding controversial subjects.
Just include access to alternative information in the library. Do not block school internet access to ID sites. Acknowledge and allow questions about alternatives to evolution.
Dang. They're on to us.
Nothing like a good Communist rant.
Calling ID advocates strict literalists shows how little homework this author has done.
"Since then Intelligent Design has been promoted by Christian fundamentalists as the way to get the Bible and creationism into the schools."
I am 57 years old, an NOT a Christian fundamentalist.
And I was taught the equivalent of Intelligent Design, by my mother, also not a Christian fundamentalist.
So it is a false notion that Intelligent Design is some new, clever method invented by Christian fundamentalists, to sneak Bible creation over on folks.
Besides, don't the Christian fundamentalists still subscrive to the seven day version? Why would they settle for the millions of years version?
To me, Intelligent Design is the Intelligent conclusion, to the question of "where did all this neat stuff come from?"
How is it that you are reading this source?
My, my....Such graceful language. Let me see, did he leave anything out? Yes...He forgot Fang toothed, Christian idiot morons.
I am sure this guy must be fun to converse with. Especially if you fall into one of his pigeon holes.
You are the one who agrees with these commies 100%.
It's Bush's fault anyway.
Though I oppose ID taught on public schools, why the hell is the ACLU jumping into this issue?? I thought their claim to being non-partisan proponents of free speech died when they foolishly opposed the Minute Man Project (for exercising their freedom of speech no less).
Why do you think they call it "the Anti-Christian Lawyers Union?"
The Anti-Christian Lawyers Union lives for these cases.
Are you just ignoring the inconvenent points? You are the embarrassment here. I do not agree with commies, except that idiot Luddites should not be trying to sneak indefensible nonsense into science class. I agree with that, as disagreeing would require surrendering my brain at the door as you seem to have done.
This is probably the only issue the commies will ever have that can't lose. This is the one you gave them.
Way to go!
"Last year, the Dover city school board instituted a policy that requires high school biology teachers to read a statement to students that says Darwin's theory of evolution is "not a fact" and then notes that intelligent design offers an alternative theory for the origin and evolution of life--namely, that life in all of its complexity could not have arisen without the help of an "intelligent hand." Some teachers refused to read the statement, citing the Pennsylvania teacher code of ethics, which says, "I will never knowingly present false information to a student.""
And where is the evidence that evolution was undirected? Who decided that that is the truth? Who decided that directed evolution is a lie and why? It seems to me that it takes as much faith to believe in undirected evolution as it does for directed because it's a matter of believing something that cannot be tested.
He sure has Christians all figured out, hasn't he. Especially that they are all "fascists" (which he repeated at least three times.) He really set the tone of the article with that first paragraph, didn't he. He forgot "knuckle-dragging".
Science generally operates on the principle that the universe is comprised of intelligible and designed features, and uses intelligent design to create and test hypotheses. It certainly is not unreasonable to consider that, where nature behaves like a maching, intelligent design may be involved. Science in general does not state a-priori, what it can or cannot hypothesize or test. Certain folks who have an agenda of their own, however, whether openly or by stealth, would like to use science as a way to promote their own philosophy.
You are the one who should be embarrassed by the fact that you sound exactly like them.
Revolutionary Worker, my ass - Bob Avakian is a Nazi!!
Dude this article is from a Communist publication.
You should be embarrassed to be doing a bad thing and giving the commies an issue to sound righteous. You can pretend not to understand this all night. Stay stupid. I'm outta here.
You are the one who should be embarrassed by the fact that you sound exactly like them.
Anyone who can see your nonsense has no place in science class will sound the same to you. That's anyone with a brain.
No sign of understatement in the above. The author must not be British. There are so many barbarians at so many gates.
Maybe you "evos" will learn how Christians have felt for decades and try to support the separation of school and state, but I doubt it. Forcing your dogmatic faith to be taught to the nation's children is more important to you than limiting the size and scope of government.
Maybe it would be a good idea for the warring parties to cool the rhetoric a bit. This issue does not portend the end of Western civilization as we know it. Frankly, with these naughty young minds cruising the internet, it is quite easy to be exposed to just about everything, and every point of view. Oh the horror.
Hey maybe turning public schools into Madrasses, will turn the secularists, and the secularist left in particular, into favoring school vouchers. Think about it.
It does not, however, follow that every point of view is equally valid merely by virtue of the fact that it exists. Nor does it follow that every point of view must necessarily be given the stamp of approval civilized society provides to those ideas thought worthy of curricular inclusion.
My subtle little point is that folks are getting their panties in a wad over a trivial issue. Is this issue the primary threat to the quality of public education, or the proper training of young minds? I think not. In fact, if young minds were properly trained, they would be well able to parse the merits of this tiresome and empty controversy, which is as much about a war over capturing semantical terms, as anything else.
I just visited the link. Who's the frikin commie?
Worst kept secret of the 20th century is that communism don't work.
Didn't he get the memo???
Sheesh. Some people never learn.
"Bourgeois Politics, Law"
"Crimes of Imperialism
CIA-Cocaine, Internet... "
Setting the Record Straight
"Maoist Rev in China "
Why in the world would you post this trash here and why should anybody take ANYTHING this moonbat says, seriously?
From what I gather in this article, if any issue is supported by evil, right-wing zealot, Bible-thumping, Christians, it MUST BE STOPPED. If it is not stopped then the entire republic is in grave danger and our 230 year history as a nation will come to an end.
I'm saddened that if one is a Christian then there is no place for you or your views in the public square.
Do I believe in intelligent design? No. I am a near atheist. Do I believe there is any empirical evidence for it that is testable by the scientific method? No. Are there some elements of the evolutionary theory that will be so testable in my lifetime? No. Will we discover the origin of life in my lifetime, as it were, via the scientific method? No. So what?
A careful inspection of how our bodies and brains are constructed leads to a suspicion that we were designed by a committee.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.