Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reckless Vanity: Which Supreme Court Justice "Goes" Next?
None ^ | 11/2/05 | Dangus

Posted on 11/01/2005 8:49:23 PM PST by dangus

You may think that it seems like there's been a lot of nomination activity lately. But even including the last two departures from the Supreme Court, there's been a remarkable lack of retirements from the Court. As a result, there are several judges who may yet go before the end of Bush's term. (I'd give an over-under of about 1.)

Which do you think is most likely to go next?

--> Liberal John Paul Stevens, appointed by "President" Ford in 1975. He will be 88 by the next election. --> Radical Ruth Bader Ginsburg, appointed by "President" Bill Clinton in 1993. She will be 75. She survived cancer, but is rumored to be visibly ill lately. --> Moderate Anthony Kennedy, appointed by President Ronald Reagan in his lame duck years (1987) will be 72, way past retirement ages in most lines of work, but not terribly old for a judge. He's probably liberal enough that he wouldn't think of retiring to give President Bush a chance to replace him, but he's still Republican enough that he hardly seems likely to want to hold out for a Democratic President. But perhaps we're best to pray -- and I'm serious folks, let's pray -- that his being in contact with colleagues who are serious, conservative thinkers and devout Catholics will pull him back from the dark side. --> Conservative Anthony Scalia, appointed by Ronald Reagan in 1986. I suppose he'd like to stick around and enjoy the fruits of those hard years in the wilderness, but who knows? Maybe he might figure that his mission is accomplished, and he can let Bush pick someone like, oh, say, Janice Rogers Brown. He will be 72, after all. --> Liberal David Souter, appointed by George's old man in 1990 shows no sign of slowing down. Maybe we can throw some black cats in front of him? He'll be 69 in '08. --> Conservative Clarence Thomas. What? He's still only 57? --> Conservative John Roberts. Who knows? Maybe he'll get pissed off when he finds out he's the chief justice, but he still has to fetch coffee for Ol' Buzzy.

While we're speculating, who might replace these guys?

By the way, it's real easy to imagine that only Stevens retires, if even he does. On the other hand, if a justice retires and is replaces by another conservative, who knows? Maybe several judges might turn in.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: dangus; deadpool; next; nosneezeondoorknobs; predictions; retirements; scotus; supremecourt; ussc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-63 next last

1 posted on 11/01/2005 8:49:24 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dangus

Ginsburg


2 posted on 11/01/2005 8:51:37 PM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

I'm betting that there will be one more on W's watch, probably from one of the AJ passing away, but it could be due to a retirement or health issues


3 posted on 11/01/2005 8:53:11 PM PST by feedback doctor (Liberalism is like a religion - islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Sen Inhofe said in a stop here this summer that Justice Stevens plans to retire around the end of this year.


4 posted on 11/01/2005 8:53:17 PM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII MOM -- Istook for OK Governor in 2006! Allen in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus
The only way a Liberal will leave the bench right now is in the Coroner's wagon
5 posted on 11/01/2005 8:53:49 PM PST by MJY1288 (Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Better yet which Ex President will go first

Ford

Carter

Bush Sr.

or the STD laden, Stainmaker put some ice on it Billllll
Clintoooonnnnn


6 posted on 11/01/2005 8:53:49 PM PST by al baby (Father of the beeber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Here's another vanity thread for ya
7 posted on 11/01/2005 8:54:10 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

I don't know what happened to my line breaks, but here goes a second time:

--> Liberal John Paul Stevens, appointed by "President" Ford in 1975. He will be 88 by the next election.

--> Radical Ruth Bader Ginsburg, appointed by "President" Bill Clinton in 1993. She will be 75. She survived cancer, but is rumored to be visibly ill lately.

--> Moderate Anthony Kennedy, appointed by President Ronald Reagan in his lame duck years (1987) will be 72, way past retirement ages in most lines of work, but not terribly old for a judge. He's probably liberal enough that he wouldn't think of retiring to give President Bush a chance to replace him, but he's still Republican enough that he hardly seems likely to want to hold out for a Democratic President. But perhaps we're best to pray -- and I'm serious folks, let's pray -- that his being in contact with colleagues who are serious, conservative thinkers and devout Catholics will pull him back from the dark side.

--> Conservative Anthony Scalia, appointed by Ronald Reagan in 1986. I suppose he'd like to stick around and enjoy the fruits of those hard years in the wilderness, but who knows? Maybe he might figure that his mission is accomplished, and he can let Bush pick someone like, oh, say, Janice Rogers Brown. He will be 72, after all.

--> Liberal David Souter, appointed by George's old man in 1990 shows no sign of slowing down. Maybe we can throw some black cats in front of him? He'll be 69 in '08.

--> Conservative Clarence Thomas. What? He's still only 57?

--> Conservative John Roberts. Who knows? Maybe he'll get pissed off when he finds out he's the chief justice, but he still has to fetch coffee for Ol' Buzzy.

O yeah... and lefty Steve Breyer, who will turn 70.


8 posted on 11/01/2005 8:54:12 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

3-1 odds on Ginsberg in this Dead Pool.


9 posted on 11/01/2005 8:54:40 PM PST by Clemenza (In League with the Freemasons, The Bilderbergers, and the Learned Elders of Zion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Clinton = Killed by jealous husband :-)


10 posted on 11/01/2005 8:55:06 PM PST by MJY1288 (Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Stevens. He's getting up there. I'll be surprised if he survives this term.


11 posted on 11/01/2005 8:55:15 PM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, appointed by "President" Bill Clinton in 1993. She will be 75. She survived cancer, but is rumored to be visibly ill lately. -->

Not to wish ill on anyone, but her retirement wether health related or not would be the best for the country.

12 posted on 11/01/2005 8:55:24 PM PST by adamsjas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Just savoring the thought of Thomas being there when all the leftist old guard are gone.... mmmmmmmmmm.


13 posted on 11/01/2005 8:55:30 PM PST by thoughtomator (Alito Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Roberts, being the Chief, fetches coffee for no one. Court Tradition.
14 posted on 11/01/2005 8:56:06 PM PST by JRios1968 ("Cogito, ergo FReep": I think, therefore I FReep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

oops.


15 posted on 11/01/2005 8:56:48 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Hey, now, John Paul Stevens is every inch as radical as ACLU Ginsburg and IS the most leftist member of the court. Ruth Buzzi G. has almost 2 decades more to go before she can match his appalling record of judicial injustice.


16 posted on 11/01/2005 8:57:04 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (*Fightin' the system like a $2 hooker on crack*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

I would love to see that turd, Stevens go away.


17 posted on 11/01/2005 8:57:13 PM PST by satchmodog9 (Free choice is not what it seems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

I'd say the chances are even money for one vacancy and 7-2 for two vacancies sometime in the next 3 years.


18 posted on 11/01/2005 8:57:45 PM PST by PISANO (We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

I thought the silliness was evident.


19 posted on 11/01/2005 8:57:48 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

The Democrats were upset that Alito is a white male, so Janice Rogers Brown can be appointed to replace him to increase the "diversity" on the Court. We've put the Dems through so much already - it is the least that could be done for them.


20 posted on 11/01/2005 8:58:17 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: satchmodog9

Send him a blow up doll of you know who, that would put a horse off it's oats.*



(You know the one with the make up :^)


21 posted on 11/01/2005 8:59:45 PM PST by investigateworld (Abortion stops a beating heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

That would be a fortunate turn of events.


22 posted on 11/01/2005 9:00:11 PM PST by Chunga (Mock The Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Clinton = Killed by jealous husband

Nope. That would have been done when he was governor. He now has round-the-clock Secret Service protection for life. Sadly, we pay to defend the indefensible. I've wondered if he has the same STD that did in Arafat. Would explain alot.

23 posted on 11/01/2005 9:00:59 PM PST by peyton randolph (Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dangus

It was...I was sure you knew, I wasn't sure about others...


24 posted on 11/01/2005 9:01:00 PM PST by JRios1968 ("Cogito, ergo FReep": I think, therefore I FReep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: investigateworld

>> (You know the one with the make up :^) <<

Souter?


25 posted on 11/01/2005 9:01:11 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Not to wish ill on either, but I think it will be Stevens or Ginsburg. Back when Bush picked Miers, that was my first guess at his strategery.

My theory (pure speculation) was that Roberts was a quick confirmation. Then he thought Miers would be a quick stealth nominee with semi-backing from Reid, even thought she would vote as a conservative. But when the third justice stepped down, he would go for the serious firepower (someone like Janice Rogers Brown). That would either prime the base for the mid-term elections, or Bush would be a total lame duck in his last two years, so he could shoot for the moon without consequence. (Hey, it sounded good a month ago!)

26 posted on 11/01/2005 9:01:13 PM PST by inkling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

SWAG prediction:

Stevens announces his retirement in late winter 2006.

Ginsburg falls very ill in fall '06, dies soon after.


27 posted on 11/01/2005 9:01:40 PM PST by RockinRight (It’s likely for a Conservative to be a Republican, but not always the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

In this order:

Ford
Clinton
Carter
Bush 41


28 posted on 11/01/2005 9:02:18 PM PST by RockinRight (It’s likely for a Conservative to be a Republican, but not always the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dangus

I think that the President might get to nominate 2 more....replacements for Stevens & Ginsberg.


29 posted on 11/01/2005 9:02:53 PM PST by JulieRNR21 (I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

ok your down for it



30 posted on 11/01/2005 9:03:18 PM PST by al baby (Father of the beeber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: adamsjas

Even better, remember her comments about who she wanted for a new justice...a female.....wanted Bush to consider her choices. Well, well, bet she is not too pleased with this latest confirmation and this latest candidate, especially.

Wishing here she gets so po'd she quits. Doubt it, but I can dream, can't I?


31 posted on 11/01/2005 9:04:02 PM PST by del4hope (No child left behind=No child steps forward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dangus

I know who I don`t want to go next.

But the liberal justices are the most "seasoned"

Justices by year of birth:

Stevens 1920
Ginsberg 1933
Kennedy 1936
Scalia 1936
Breyer 1938
Souter 1939
Thomas 1948
Roberts 1955

O`Conner is on the way out so I didn`t count her in the mix.


32 posted on 11/01/2005 9:04:08 PM PST by Peace will be here soon ((Liberal definition of looting: "Self-help Humanitarian Aid."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Ginsberg and Stevens will probably try to hold out until the 08 elections, in hopes that a Dem gets elected.

Any future openings may be like the Rehnquist opening - natural causes.


33 posted on 11/01/2005 9:04:28 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

YEP....the Dems have set their own trap, by calling for "diversity." We better give it to them NEXT time, which I PREDICT will be within 2 years......Stevens.


34 posted on 11/01/2005 9:04:34 PM PST by goodnesswins (DEMS....40 yrs and $$$dollars for the War on Poverty, but NOT a $$ or minute for the WAR on Terror!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dangus

All of them. A plane crashes into the SCOTUS, requiring the Pres. to appoint 8 new Justices. Alito will be CJ.

(Mea cupa, just a hpothetical from my twisted mind, not a desire. :P)


35 posted on 11/01/2005 9:04:45 PM PST by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Ginsburg, Kennedy, Stevens


36 posted on 11/01/2005 9:05:53 PM PST by roylene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Killborn

hillarys plane i hope


37 posted on 11/01/2005 9:06:44 PM PST by al baby (Father of the beeber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: dangus; satchmodog9

LOL .... the dog9 knows the one (from last evening) ....


38 posted on 11/01/2005 9:07:00 PM PST by investigateworld (Abortion stops a beating heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Wow! Is Ford still alive?... I just presumed he died and nobody gave a crap. That puts him in his 90s! Carter will have just turned 81; Bush is 81, too... Bill Clinton is 59.

Let's put it this way... Bill dies the youngest. But I gotta think Ford is closed to doing what all Fords do after about 100K.


39 posted on 11/01/2005 9:07:20 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Not if the husband is a Secret Serviceman. :)

"Yeah, I was checking my weapon, and wouldn't ya know it, Billybob just walked into the line of sight! And I had ABSOLUTELY no idea that the Junior Senator was right next to him. Dang shame, huh?"


40 posted on 11/01/2005 9:08:22 PM PST by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Maybe Ginsburg or Stevens will go to their "reward" before W's term is up. We could get a twofer.


41 posted on 11/01/2005 9:08:45 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roylene

Wow. FIVE go in one term, eh? Maybe we can even find room for a Protestant.

Naaaah.


42 posted on 11/01/2005 9:09:56 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: al baby

See #40. :)


43 posted on 11/01/2005 9:10:49 PM PST by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

This could be a good Bush Plot, with Miers thrown in knowing she wouldn't fly. Could be a great show if next he is willing to appoint JRB. What could the dems possibly say?


44 posted on 11/01/2005 9:13:23 PM PST by del4hope (No child left behind=No child steps forward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Wha?

I didn't THINK I missed that other thread. It had "SCOTUS" as a key word, when I followed your link, but it didn't show up when I clicked on SCOTUS as a keyword.


45 posted on 11/01/2005 9:13:46 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288

Let's hope it's a stretch wagon.


46 posted on 11/01/2005 9:17:44 PM PST by BigCinBigD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dangus
dangus said: "On the other hand, if a justice retires and is replaces by another conservative, who knows? Maybe several judges might turn in."

A solid conservative court could mean that the liberals would have to suffer years of never being in the majority on an important decision. That would be a tough job for anyone.

47 posted on 11/01/2005 9:17:54 PM PST by William Tell (Put the RKBA on the California Constitution - Volunteer through rkba.members.sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

George Bush Sr. may be 81, but he's jumping out of planes and speeding around in boats. He's good to last.


48 posted on 11/01/2005 9:23:36 PM PST by JennysCool (Non-Y2K-Compliant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: dangus

OK, I am really going to go out on a limb here.

I predict that we are going to see Souter breaking ranks with the moonbat wing and joining ranks instead with the ones we expected him to vote with in the first place. If that happens we could start seeing some 6-3 rulings without President Bush naming yet another justice.

You heard it here first.


49 posted on 11/01/2005 9:25:46 PM PST by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

What would motivate him to do that?


50 posted on 11/01/2005 9:29:56 PM PST by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson