Maryland's O'Malley Affair -- MD4BUSH and Ryan O'Doherty

Stingray: A Blog for Salty Christians ^ | November 2, 2005 | Michael McCullough

[Alia]

The Washington Post claims today that it did not know the identity of MD4BUSH but that Post Reporter Matthew Mosk was provided copies of the message exchanges between MD4BUSH and NCPAC last fall. Mosk claims that an "intermediary acting on behalf of MD4BUSH" gave him sign-on information to vie the private e-mails. Mosk claims that he corroborated the story by showing the e-mails to Steffen in order to gain confirmation.

Using Southack's querry -- "We still don't know how NCPAC's identity was "revealed" (not exact quote) - suggests to me a 3rd party. Someone who DID know who NCPAC was, and who did the "netting" more than likely between Ryan and Wapo. (Or then via Ryan to WAPO.)

Is it possible that an exchange via post or freepmail took place between NCPAC and the "embed" (early on) which served as the basis for the creation of the MD4Bush identity -- and therefore, as the basis in initiating the scam upon NCPAC?

I've seen this play before in past. If so, more than likely the "net operative" is still here in FR, IME.

Thanks for all the pings, conservative in NYC. (need more java, here...)

[KSCITYBOY]

bump

[mnehring]

Journolist BTT,

Interesting that Matthew Mosk was behind this.. bookmarking

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

BUMP