Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Libloather

What a cryin' shame that Libby has been indicted for lying to the GJ, because of "contradictions between his testimony and the testimony of two or three reporters about what he told them, when he told them, and what words he used."

As far as I can tell, the reporters in questions have all stated either Libby didn't give them the name of the CIA employee in question, or else they said they didn't "think" he did, or they can't remember for sure.

But, because there are inconsistencies of the conversations which took place years ago, the GJ indicted one person. Why didn’t the GJ indict all of the parties involved in the inconsistencies? We know why. The prosecution had an agenda.

That’s what the trial will be about. Comparing what the reporters said was said, with what Libby said was said. Looks weak to me. But the Fanatical Liberal Left got what they wanted, an indictment, albeit a little fish.


7 posted on 11/02/2005 7:56:37 PM PST by i_dont_chat (Houston, TX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: i_dont_chat
"..albeit a little fish."

Cruel children throw stones at a frog in jest, but the frog dies in earnest.

This farce by an over zealous prosecutor cannot be allowed to stand.
12 posted on 11/02/2005 8:15:41 PM PST by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson