Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Just when I thought liberals could sink no lower, that they had gone about a loopy as a group of humans could possibly become, the idiots outdo themselves and prove me wrong.
1 posted on 11/03/2005 6:14:25 AM PST by 84rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 84rules
Parents have no due process or privacy right to override the determinations of public schools as to the information to which their children will be exposed while enrolled as students.

What about private schools?

2 posted on 11/03/2005 6:18:02 AM PST by A. Pole (M. Boskin: "It doesn't make any difference whether a country makes potato chips or computer chips!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 84rules

9th circus court of liberals strikes again.


6 posted on 11/03/2005 6:39:40 AM PST by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 84rules
"Parents have no due process or privacy right to override the determinations of public schools as to the information to which their children will be exposed while enrolled as students."

Utter BS.

7 posted on 11/03/2005 6:40:51 AM PST by Skooz (If you think Adolf Hitler was a Christian, you are a blithering idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 84rules

I hope this can be appealed to SCOTUS, and they accept. This is utter, liberal, homophilic, abortophilic nonsense.


8 posted on 11/03/2005 6:43:05 AM PST by AbeKrieger (Islam is the virus that causes al-Qaeda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 84rules
";......Parents have no due process or privacy right to override the determinations of public schools as to the information to which their children will be exposed while enrolled as students."

What information? It looks to me more like a interrogation.

";......Parents have no due process or privacy right to override the determinations of public schools as to the interrogations to which their children will be exposed while enrolled as students."

10 posted on 11/03/2005 7:04:58 AM PST by bremenboy (I am always right except when I am wrong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 84rules

Schools should be about learning Math, English, Science, etc. Anthing else is out of line and over the line. No wonder our kids are behind so much. They go to school to learn and all they get is thiss B___t. That is NOT the right of the school to ask these questions. It is NOT right. That kind of thing should be addressed in the home at the proper time. This is nonsense at its fullest and it's time this is addressed and resolved. What in the hell is the matter with this court anyway? I'd pull my kids out of there in a heartbeat at the first sign of anything like that in schools. No way..no how would I EVER submit my kids to this kind of garbage. And that's exactly what it is...garbage.

Maybe a lot of people can pulll their kids out and send them elsewhere but...what of those who cannot? They are being held captive and it's not the American way!


11 posted on 11/03/2005 7:05:09 AM PST by cubreporter (I trust Rush. He has done more for our country than any of us will ever know. God bless him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 84rules

Yesterday's thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1514385/posts
Court says parents not sole providers of kids' sex education


12 posted on 11/03/2005 7:05:12 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 84rules

Well... as long as people such as myself SINGLE RENTERS are paying the transfer payments to the democratic babymachinemakers' edumacation, we should have absolutely no say in the deal. I mean... a 30-year-old, 100 pound female takes up so much more of the public school system than the babymamas' 12 chil'en and should therefore get the gov't to stick a pipe into our wallets for them. THAT'S FAIR.


13 posted on 11/03/2005 7:09:09 AM PST by Little Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 84rules

Explain the activism? The judges are saying that the constitution does not explicitly state that parents have some rights.

The legislature has passed a law, the the judges are saying that, absent that law being unconstitutional, they are going to enforce the law.

Shouldn't we be fighting to change the law, or are we saying that the justices should find an unenumerated constitutional right of parents to control what their children learn in school?

I have mixed feelings about this, but I would like to understand how this is activist.


16 posted on 11/03/2005 7:32:01 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 84rules

No mention of the Hatch Amendment?


18 posted on 11/03/2005 8:03:09 AM PST by MJemison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 84rules

We need to break up the 9th circuit - remember these are democrat values. The dems can hide but they cant run from the people who love them but hate families, children, christians, and values.


20 posted on 11/03/2005 8:19:15 AM PST by sasafras ("Licentiousness destroyes order, and when chaos ensues, the yearning for order will destroy freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: King Prout

ping


21 posted on 11/03/2005 8:21:14 AM PST by Alice au Wonderland (A Liberal: Someone whose money or property isn't on the line yet. ---Old Doc Tsu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 84rules
They've finally succeeded in outlawing the flag and parenthood. I'm sure the Nine Circus Clowns will shortly find a way to declare apple pie unconstitutional as well.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We're Know We're Dead Wrong.")

22 posted on 11/03/2005 8:21:33 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 84rules
Judge Stephen Reinhardt, writing for the panel, said "no such specific right can be found in the deep roots of the nation's history and tradition or implied in the concept of ordered liberty."

Unbeknownst to "his honor" S. Reinhardt, COMMON SENSE was always part of the deep roots of the nation's judicial history and tradition.

23 posted on 11/03/2005 8:29:36 AM PST by BureaucratusMaximus (The 2005 Chicago White Sox---World Series Champs---WOO! HOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 84rules

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1514876/posts
U.S. Court Allows Survey of Children on Sex Topics


24 posted on 11/03/2005 1:08:06 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson