Skip to comments.Hannity Thread - Monday 11/7/2005
Posted on 11/07/2005 12:11:50 PM PST by sofaman
Hannity Time!!! Three hours until the Great One!
I'm watching Sessions on the floor.
Hannity is such a tool. STFU McLame!
"I assume that you don't like Hannity..."
Listen to him interview mccain.
I wonder if the libs love McCain... i'm sure they do.
I can't believ this guy, lecturing people on character.
The Libby case doesn't hinge on whether or not Plame was covert. Fitz tried to have it both ways, "the case is serious because outing agents is serious," and at the same time "I am not saying Plame was covert."
For those who are employing radio silence:
It's on commercial and when they're back it's on the Gang of 14.
Please dont waste another segment with mccain!!!!
Nobody should have to be made to listen to Hannity interview McCain. It's cruel and unusual punishment.
I was corrected on another thread about the Vallely's son Scott. Scott died while attending the Special Forces Qualification Course, not in Iraq.
This memorial fund was established in April 2004 to honor and memorialize PFC Scott Paul Vallely. Scott died on April 20, 2004 while in his fourth week of Special Forces training. He was 29 years old and had just completed Infantry Basic and Advance Courses at Fort Benning, Georgia as well as Airborne School to qualify to attend the Special Forces School at Fort Bragg, NC.
He entered the service in October 2003. His desire was to serve his country and make a contribution to the Global War on Terror to preserve the freedom of the American people and the free world. His goal was to be an elite member of a Special Forces A Team.
I'm sure that they positively adore McLame. Why Hannity gives that POS a venue to spew his garbage is a mystery to me.
Why did he have agents at the neighbors two days before announcing the indictment? Thoughts? If he knew Libby had twice lied with documents proving the contrary, why would he still send them?
Like in PA, I wish Toomey would have been Seantor instead of Specter, but the hard cold fact of it is, Toomey didn't have a PRAYER in PA in it's currend political configruation. Specter did. If Toomey had beaten Specter, even though Toomey reflects the values of people like me more often, he would have lost in the general election and that seat would be a democrat seat and the Republican Senate Majority would be 54. That's just the reality of it. I don't like the RINOS, but if they were all democrat seats, it would be a 48 Republican seat minority, 1 jeffordcrat, and 51 democrats. And how much do we think we'd get done in the Senate then with Senate Majoriry leader Reid?
I'm a solid "die hard" Christian voter, but I'm also a realist, and charging head long into a ten foot fortified wall, with a trench infront of it and riflemen all along the top of the wall isn't my idea of standing firm to principle. It's my idea of STUPID!!! You pick and choose your fights carefully and when it comes to politics and the military, you don't pick a fight you KNOW you will lose. That's stupid. The Bible doesn't advocate that kind of shortsightedness. One can stand up for their beliefs, and fight bit and piece to get them as the majority, and fighting to help elect Forrester will be better for the continuing growth of the national conservative movement, than being apathetic and just allowing corzine to win because of mass conservative inaction. That is just plain stupid and stubborn beyond reason.
Yeah the guy was obviously a moron. I wish he would have been in a room that was full of REAL Marines and see what happened to him.
Cya later. 8)
Yeah really. 8)
Back on, how did the gang meeting go... Alito is a sound conservative... sounds good... he's favorably impressive.
This doesn't sound like McCain at all. His voice sounds very sickly.
Some guy who says "oh BTW Sean I'm a Marine", and then his whole call was blasting Sean for backing the war, calling Bush a liar, saying the problems with the war had nothin gto do with Wilson or anything he said, yadda yadda yadda. Pick a lib talking point against the war and he said it. Marine by butt. It was a joke of a liberal call.
Thinks he's a superb choice, but he can't speak for anyone else.
I wish. I'd love to have an mp3 of that interview. I'll have to tinker with that. 8) THAT is an interview that needs to SWARM ALL OVER the conservative movement. It totally destroys any lib that talks about anything wilson has said as evidence.
That is just the voice that he uses when he is trying to sound measured and statesmanlike. He is very transparent.
To make sure the third sentence in paragraph 1.f. of the indictment was not easily shown to be untrue. Reporters would be nosing around Wilson's place after the indictment was handed down, and it would have been quite embarrassing if a reporter asked a neighbor, etc, ... you get the idea, it would be a fact automatically damaging to the prosecutor's credibility.
Fitzgerald gratuitously set-up the meme that Plame was covert, even to the point of putting the phrase "and her employment status was classified" in the indictment. All part of setting a misleading stage. But he had his case against Libby even without that misleading setting.
Thanks....I get Hannity on an hours delay...so I won't hear it for a while...
BTW...I just got done hearing Maj. Gen. Vallely...what a HOOT...this whole thing is gonna blow up in Wilson, Plame, Chrissy Matthews, Fitzy, Reid, ALL of their faces!!!!!
Oh what a happy day!!!
I suspect that a great many people to call in and say they are or were in the miltiary and then rip the miltiary and Bush for the war have never really been in the military. I wish each talk show host when a caller like that calls in, simply asks, what unit were you assigned to? And if they give some pat answer like the 101st Airborne or the 1st Marine Expeditionary, or 3rd Infantry Division, which anyone who has paid attention to the war in Iraq knows were there, then says "no on. I mean what UNIT. What batallian, what company? The specific unit". A REAL soldier or Marine will be able to spout that off JIFFY QUICK. Could also ask them what's your serial number. They know that just like ther know their birthday. If anyone fails to be able to rattle that off with NO pause, or they get angry and spew vulgarities or something, they're NOT military, past, present, or EVER. I wish talk show hosts would start doing that and prove out fake callers. Anyone calling into a show and claiming to be militray is a total SCUM BAG and deserves nothing short of a severe beating that removes them from solid foods for a few weeks. ;|
The Libby case was about Libby "lying" during an investigation of a case that shouldn't have been brought...
If HE did lie...he will be held accountable...but, in the meantime....Wilson, Plame, Vallely, Andrea Mitchell, Russert, Miller, Cooper and all of the rest will have to testify in public, under oath....yes!!!!
Thats because his New York buddies wouldn't shell out 1000 bucks a plate for his 2008 run for the Office.
They said he was to old to be a serious consideration for the top ticket.
Exactly. You just remember those things, and yours was your sons and you remember it still. It's not something you don't know. It would put a stop to it for a while anyway until libs started doing research on military units that have served in Iraq and when and starts using them in their calls.
What's he saying?
Yeah I'm so sick of hannity's love fests with mclame. WHY DOES HE DO THAT!?!?!? mccain is a betrayer of the GOP, why doesn't he call him on that and ask him when he is going to be a team player?
Yeah really. I mean, I like Hannity. He's a great conservative. But his patty cake mccain interviews get REALLY OLD! Same with Lieberman though they're amusing. It still gets old.
Chrissy Matthews has decided to "take a look at the leaking of a CIA agent case, A DIFFERENT way....by looking at the "wider" picture---how the White House MANIPULATED the media"....
yeppers....now that Wilson may be blowing up in their faces...they are saying that Bush used a "calculated plan to manipulate the media" into pushing for war, using cherry-picked CIA evidence...yada, yada....
There is the whole dem plan, right there. One is not surprised that Chrissy is on board with it.
I know it's not evidence pertaining to the charges on Libby, but it shows that the whole basis of the investigation is thin and lacking incredibility. And the other stuff establishes that the whole investigation was based on a false premise. That someone leaked plame as a CIA covert operative, which she hadn't been for over seven years now, and that the investigation was baseless and did not prove anything, therefore it would be a travesty to convict Libby for crimes of lying and misleading the GJ, and obstructing the investigation of a crime that he didn't commit, that only took place because of the investigation and during it, and in fact it wasn't even a crime. It just all makes it very hard to convict I think.
OXYGEN! GIVE ME OXYGEN!!! A question about most conservativs not being happy with mccain!
But when asked (I think it was one of the first questions), "So was she covert", he either said he didn't know or that was a question for the CIA. I have to watch the clip again. I remember my jaw hitting the ground and thinking even though it doesn't relate to this indictment, wouldn't that be the first thing you find out if you're to find out if her identity was leaked?
He's still of impeccable character, and his son died wearing the uniform. Since he served his country himself and cindy sheehan and joe wilson never have, he has more right to speak and more credibility than both of them put together.
See, McCain thinks he can get the nomination. He's doing fine. Just look at the name recognition polls.
The Gang of 14 = RINO's
Nuance? Um, how about the fact that Legislative filibusters are CONSTITUTIONAL, and JUDICIAL FILIBUSTERS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!! There are seven instances in which the U.S. Constitution says are justified. Judicial filibusters are NOT one of those seven, therefore they are UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!! mccain just lied for Pete's sake.
More specifically, (allegedly) lying to investigators (he is free to lie his ass off to reporters, before, during and after) about information that is material to figuring out the source of information published in the Novak column.
What is puzzling though, is that the WH could have made the same argument raised by 36 news organizations, and it (the WH) could have done so with knowledge of the facts. But it didn't. Why not? Why did the WH permit the investigation when it knew beyond any doubt whatsoever that 50 USC 421 had not been violated, even if the WH was the source. Was it fear of political embarrassment? If so, it was silly, because what it has now is embarrassment delayed and magnified.
He was trying to prevent the senate from breaking down re: the 14.... excuse me, I must heave again.
AT least Hannity pointed that out but then didn't make mccain answer the fact he was wrong. Judicial filibusters are NOT justified. GOD we need a REAL CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN to replace him in Arizona.
I respect McCain for his service. But he's a punk as a Republican.
He too will be subpeonaed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.