Posted on 11/08/2005 4:53:46 PM PST by rhema
If you were wondering how the planet suddenly ran out of natural gas as you sat shivering in your house with the thermostat set at 62 so you could preserve a modicum of your retirement money, just look at a 2003 study from the National Petroleum Council (www.npc.org). You'll learn that there's plenty of natural gas, much of it right here in the U.S. The problem is that environmental groups won't let us get at it.
Today natural gas provides about 25 percent of U.S. energy needs, generates about 19 percent of electrical power, and is used for heating and cooking in more than 60 million homes. The greenies reluctantly embraced natural gas about a decade ago because it is undeniably cleaner and more efficient than oil or coal. But at the same time they were pumping up demand for natural gas they also were restricting supply by blocking any new drilling or added infrastructure to deliver already discovered reserves. This led to the high prices Minnesotans and other Americans are seeing today, something that was predictable two years ago.
"There are laws and regulations that unnecessarily hinder pipeline and infrastructure siting or interfere with the functionality of the market in ways that lead to inefficiencies," the NPC said in its September 2003 report, "Balancing Natural Gas Policy." "Overall, these conflicting policies have contributed to today's tight supply/demand balance, with higher and volatile gas prices."
This is nothing new. Alaska has been trying for three decades to build a pipeline that would deliver an estimated 35 trillion cubic feet of known natural gas reserves from North Slope fields to us here in the Midwest (annual U.S. residential consumption is about 5 trillion cubic feet). The continental shelves just off our coast are estimated to hold about 58 trillion cubic feet. Preliminary estimates of the Rockies see 11 trillion cubic feet.
Undeterred by these uncomfortable facts, environmentalists continue to thwart new production and infrastructure at every turn.
When the greenies' favorite bogeyman, President Bush, invaded Iraq, they started carping again about our need to wean ourselves from "foreign" energy sources, i.e., Mideast oil. We need, they said, to develop reliable domestic sources of energy that don't require us to invade oil-rich nations to guarantee supply.
What, may I ask, would they call 93 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in Alaska and off-shore? Adding insult to injury, their obstructionist policies and draconian regulations are driving U.S. energy companies to cultivate foreign sources of natural gas exactly what the greenies said they didn't want when we have so much natural gas here that it's practically bubbling out of the ground.
"North America is moving to a period in its history in which it will no longer be self-reliant in meeting its growing natural gas needs," the NPC said quite presciently in 2003. "Government policy encourages the use of natural gas but does not address the corresponding need for additional natural gas supplies."
In the perfect world of the Sierra Club and Greenpeace, it's all off limits. Last year the Greenpeace ship MV Arctic Sunrise sailed to the Coronado Islands off Baja California. That's where ChevronTexaco would like to build a liquid natural gas facility to accept LNG tankers, something Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan encouraged two years ago. No way, the greenies said.
"The islands are an important habitat for wildlife, home to one of the most diverse seabird colonies, gray whales and harbor seals," Greenpeace said. "All face devastation from the construction of a LNG terminal."
This, in short, is why Minnesotans will pay $13 per million BTUs this winter for natural gas while the Chinese will pay less than $5 and Australians less than $4. The problem is not too much demand, but unnecessary and illogical restrictions on supply.
So the next time you get a mailing from Greenpeace or the Sierra Club (or the Democratic Party), send it back with a note that reads, "I already gave," and include a copy of your utility bill.
Wow this article nails it.
Sticker Shock-$3 a gallon gas? Click the picture:
Thank the idiot soccor mom who sends $25 to every whacked eco-fascist group that mails out pictures of poor, little bunnies savaged by evil capitalists.
When these moron females are shivering this winter, tell them to go trap rats and sew a fur coat.
The Senate just voted to drill for oil in Alaska. House Pubbies like Mike Castle are saying they'll vote against it.
I think we should call Castle's office and threaten to drill up his a$$
"Do the [Environmental groups] have Large Talons???"
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
This is why I don't give a crap if a bunch of whiny blue state liberals in the NE freeze their butts off this winter.
bump to me
Greenpeace = today's useful idiots, parading around like buffoons that they are. I hope they all rot in hell for their poor decisions here while they were on earth!
Excellent point..." if a bunch of whiny blue state liberals in the NE freeze their butts off this winter."
"why Minnesotans will pay $13 per million BTUs this winter for natural gas while the Chinese will pay less than $5 and Australians less than $4. The problem is not too much demand, but unnecessary and illogical restrictions on supply."
How about substituting freeze in the dark for rotting in h*ll? ;-)
That way we can enjoy a bit of schaudenfreude. Not that we aren't right now.
We use a wood burner for heat thank goodness. I am curious though as to why my monthly gas well check hasn't gone up in conjunction to the cost for everyone else to use it. Hmmmmm.
Only superficially. If they knew who was funding the greenies, it would be a real story.
I pray that God first gives them a chance to be saved and changed, but if they refuse to change implements your idea swiftly. The sooner they stop being environmentalists the better.
Nothing new under the sun. Same damn arguments over and over again, just slightly different end costs for oil/gas products. We have had plenty of time since OPEC put the screws to us back in 72. All the players are the same. The conservative political machine does not have the backbone to make things better so we all loose. And the Amercian public cannot be expected to vote on real issues. Status quo remains for most of our social issues, only things that never gets a chance at real reform is the energy needs of this country.
No, they have surly, slavering lawyers and lobbyists.
read later
Great article.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.