Posted on 11/14/2005 10:39:45 AM PST by patriotgal1787
A convicted child molester would not qualify for a carry license. He would have to break the law just to own a gun or to carry one.
>>The spread sheet listed the names, addresses, dob, sex and race of each CWP holder.<<
Such an extensive list would be a wonderful place to start looking for someone's identity to steal. Maybe you could find a few Social Security Numbers with google, for many other public records, especially court filings have them buried in the text.
Should not any media outlet that makes such ID theft possible be held liable for facilitating the crime? This is based on one of the legal theories by which gun-grabbers have supported lawsuits against those who manufacture and sell lawful firearms.
What is good for the goose is good for the gander.
Now, before anyone gets their panties in a wad, they need to understand that, just as surely as it's an unpopular bit of truth (especially in this day and age), there are many notable exceptions.
... decided to pull it from their site. The spread sheet listed the names, addresses, dob, sex and race of each CWP holder.Too bad they pulled it. It can be tough to find single ladies near my age who aren't rabidly anti-gun ;)
Do you seriously want a convicted child molester having the right to carry a concealed weapon, as he follows your daughter to school?
Here is my original comment-"If carrying a concealed weapon is a right (presuming the individual is not a criminal), why are they required to pay $100 for that right, and why do they need a license?"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.