Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why was Sen. Jay Rockefeller talking to Bashar Assad about the president's "plans" for Iraq?
Weekly Standard ^ | November 16, 2005 | Edward Morrisey

Posted on 11/16/2005 7:30:38 AM PST by billorites

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: billorites
According to the Italian press, Rockefeller knew the information was being given by France and help it along. Why is he not being investigated?????
21 posted on 11/16/2005 7:54:32 AM PST by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randog

Who was the Chariman of the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2002, I do not think it was a Republican?


And for those who have not read Rockey's leaked memo .....

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102206,00.html

http://www.intelmemo.com/

"We have carefully reviewed our options under the rules and believe we have identified the best approach. Our plan is as follows:

Pull the majority along as far as we can on issues that may lead to major new disclosures regarding improper or questionable conduct by administration officials. We are having some success in that regard. For example, in addition to the president's State of the Union speech, the chairman has agreed to look at the activities of the Office of the Secretary of Defense as well as Secretary Bolton's office at the State department. The fact that the chairman supports our investigations into these offices and co-signs our requests for information is helpful and potentially crucial. We don't know what we will find but our prospects for getting the access we seek is far greater when we have the backing of the majority. (Note: we can verbally mention some of the intriguing leads we are pursuing.)

2) Assiduously prepare Democratic "additional views" to attach to any interim or final reports the committee may release. Committee rules provide this opportunity and we intend to take full advantage of it. In that regard, we have already compiled all the public statements on Iraq made by senior administration officials. We will identify the most exaggerated claims and contrast them with the intelligence estimates that have since been declassified. Our additional views will also, among other things, castigate the majority for seeking to limit the scope of the inquiry. The Democrats will then be in a strong position to reopen the question of establishing an independent commission (i.e. the Corzine amendment).

3) Prepare to launch an independent investigation when it becomes clear we have exhausted the opportunity to usefully collaborate with the majority. We can pull the trigger on an independent investigation at any time-- but we can only do so once. The best time to do so will probably be next year either:

A) After we have already released our additional views on an interim report -- thereby providing as many as three opportunities to make our case to the public: 1) additional views on the interim report; 2) announcement of our independent investigation; and 3) additional views on the final investigation; or

B) Once we identify solid leads the majority does not want to pursue. We could attract more coverage and have greater credibility in that context than one in which we simply launch an independent investigation based on principled but vague notions regarding the "use" of intelligence.

In the meantime, even without a specifically authorized independent investigation, we continue to act independently when we encounter foot-dragging on the part of the majority. For example, the FBI Niger investigation was done solely at the request of the vice chairman; we have independently submitted written questions to DoD; and we are preparing further independent requests for information.

Summary

Intelligence issues are clearly secondary to the public's concern regarding the insurgency in Iraq. Yet, we have an important role to play in the revealing the misleading -- if not flagrantly dishonest methods and motives -- of the senior administration officials who made the case for a unilateral, preemptive war. The approach outline above seems to offer the best prospect for exposing the administration's dubious motives and methods."



22 posted on 11/16/2005 7:55:00 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: strategofr
Unless Senate Republicans started talking about it...

The members of the Senate have way too much class and dignity to slam members of the opposition.....except for the Dimocrats, of course!

23 posted on 11/16/2005 8:00:56 AM PST by Onelifetogive (* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: billorites

I'm going back to being apolitical...I had much lower blood pressure then. This stuff is infuriating!


24 posted on 11/16/2005 8:02:36 AM PST by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
If W hasn't the cojones to bring the Logan Act to bear against this bought-state senator (remember -- he didn't do anything to Jim McDermott for a similar offense!) then he'll deserve to go the way of Richard Nixon, who let Jane Fonda, Ramsey Clark and J Effin' Kerrey treat with the North Vietnamese while the rest of us were at war with them.
25 posted on 11/16/2005 8:08:48 AM PST by Snickersnee (Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
It seems it is time for a massive push by We the People to demand the Senate investigate this traitors actions. I will be calling Kay Bailey and John Cornyn as well as a snail mail and e-mail. This kind of action should not be allowed to just pass by. I may even contact Sam Johnson my Representative to follow up on this in the House.
26 posted on 11/16/2005 8:11:51 AM PST by normy (Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

This story just leaves me dumbfounded. Does no one else in the media see that Rockefeller did something wrong? How can the people who get so excited over Wilson and Plame not be all over this? Am I the crazy one?


27 posted on 11/16/2005 8:15:15 AM PST by joylyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Chariman of the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2002 - Senator Bob Graham, D-Florida

SENATE AND HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEES ANNOUNCE JOINT INQUIRY INTO THE SEPTEMBER 11th TERRORIST ATTACKS WASHINGTON (February 14, 2002) - The Senate and House Intelligence Committees will conduct a joint inquiry into the Intelligence Community's activities before, during and since the September 11th, 2001, terrorist attacks against the United States, the panels' leaders announced today.

Among the purposes of this joint effort is ascertaining why the Intelligence Community did not learn of the September 11th attacks in advance, and to identify what, if anything, might be done to better the position the Intelligence Community to warn of and prevent future terrorist attacks and other threats of the 21st Century. The Committees may seek to legislate changes to remedy any systemic deficiencies revealed by the joint inquiry.

The inquiry was announced by Senator Bob Graham, D-Florida, chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI); Representative Porter Goss, R-Florida, chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI); SSCI Vice Chairman Richard C. Shelby, R-Alabama; and HPSCI Ranking Democrat Nancy Pelosi, D-California.


The TIMING is suspicious!
28 posted on 11/16/2005 8:20:24 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (11, 175, 77, 93 - In Memory Always)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: billorites

I'm making an Online Petition...here is what I have so far if anybody would like to give ideas for the final draft.

Whereas U.S. Senator Jay Rockefeller(D) has admitted openly and publically to providing information to Syria, a Baathist ally of the former dictator of Iraq (Saddam Hussein) which may have enabled Iraq to prepare against the actions of the United States government to hold Iraq accountable under mulitiple resolutions of the United Nations and for Hussein's personal actions of harboring, aiding and comforting terrorists...(See admissions below)

----ROCKEFELLER: "No. I mean, this question is asked a thousand times and I'll be happy to answer it a thousand times. I took a trip by myself in January of 2002 to Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Syria, and I told each of the heads of state that it was my view that George Bush had already made up his mind to go to war against Iraq, that that was a predetermined set course which had taken shape shortly after 9/11."

Whereas U.S. Senator Jay Rockerfeller had given his opinion to Syria of the impending military actions against Syria's ally, dictator Saddam Hussein and his regime in Iraq, which he gleaned through his position as a United States Senator WHOM HAVING ACCESS TO NATIONAL SECURITY DOCUMENTS THROUGH WHICH HIS OPINION MAY HAVE BEEN FORMED and through such actions precipitated the creation of a more dangerous situations for our Armed Forces...

Wheras through U.S. Senatory Jay Rockerfeller's actions and the misuse of Nation Security Intelligence, we the People of the United States of America IMPLORE and EMPOWER you, worthy protectors of the Constitution of the United States of America, to disallow U.S. Senator Jay Rockerfeller of the privleges of his seat as a U.S. Senator, bring charges against him for Sedition and Treason and hold formal inquiries to plumb the depths of his actions against the Constitution of the United States


29 posted on 11/16/2005 8:21:27 AM PST by mrclark-from-hannitys-site
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

The day after look who showed up according to the following as noted in this post under .....

"Rockefeller, for his part, neglected to mention the trip at the time, although he did issue press releases about his meeting with Saudi leaders on the same junket (as noted by the blogger Dinocrat)."




http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2005/11/14/gun-running-to-the-khmer-rouge-ii-jay-rockefeller-edition/

http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/020109/2002010919.html


Al-Assad confers with the US Senate delegation
Syria-USA, Politics, 1/9/2002

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad at the Damascus al-Shaab palace on Tuesday received W Owens and members of the US Senate: Richard Durban, David Price and Jim Dives and members of their accompanying delegation. The meeting was attended by the Deputy Premier and foreign minister Farouk al-Shara and the US ambassador in Damascus Theodore Qattouf.



30 posted on 11/16/2005 8:23:37 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded

Oh yes, I forgot about Senator Bob Graham and his presidential campaign run upon the platform of "intelligence".

Thank you.


31 posted on 11/16/2005 8:26:15 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mrclark-from-hannitys-site

First I would like to know, if we the tax payers paid for Rockefeller's trip? "IF" he flew commercial? Who else was on the flight from the origin, and what European countries did his flight land in? Say like France or Italy, or England.

Where was Joe Wilson during this trip?


32 posted on 11/16/2005 8:33:52 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Did you see this as well in my post? I just saw it.

HPSCI Ranking Democrat Nancy Pelosi, D-California.
33 posted on 11/16/2005 8:35:16 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (11, 175, 77, 93 - In Memory Always)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Well, he said on Fox, "I took a trip by myself", but in the Arabic News report:

"Syrian President Bashar al-Assad at the Damascus al-Shaab palace on Monday received the US senator J. Rockefeller and members of the accompanying delegation."

Hmmm......


34 posted on 11/16/2005 8:38:10 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (11, 175, 77, 93 - In Memory Always)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded

I have to admit I read past her name.


35 posted on 11/16/2005 8:46:13 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded

"Well, he said on Fox, "I took a trip by myself", but in the Arabic News report: "


A liberal Senator going to Damascus all by himself does not have a ring of truth. Somebody had to carry his bags.


36 posted on 11/16/2005 8:48:07 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Rockefellers (Standard Oil) have owned and operated Saudi for a hundred years. It is their ME fiefdom.


37 posted on 11/16/2005 8:48:32 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

He's a traitor....needed Saddam to hide his WMD....this is being investigated by the senate. Wonder if anything will come of this investigation!!!??? Doubt it...


38 posted on 11/16/2005 8:51:21 AM PST by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

It's important that there be an investigation about this!


39 posted on 11/16/2005 8:56:50 AM PST by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong
From this link...

And...

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on Tuesday at the Damascus al-Shaab palace received the chairman of the democratic minority at the US congress Richard Gephardt and members of the accompanying delegation.

Who else went on that trip, anyone know?

40 posted on 11/16/2005 8:59:56 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson