Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Woodward Knew
US News ^ | Nov 17, 2005 | Michael Barone

Posted on 11/17/2005 6:12:45 PM PST by YaYa123

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last
Everybody LOVES Michael Barone!

He makes the whole mess comprehensible!

1 posted on 11/17/2005 6:12:46 PM PST by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: YaYa123

Yes, an excellent read. I especially like that last paragraph. I'm not sure if I can quote it here without exceeding the permissible limit.


3 posted on 11/17/2005 6:19:31 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

The last sentence was a hoot - "CIA should be abolished"


4 posted on 11/17/2005 6:20:52 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Herodian

Could the MSM be getting that one wrong? They're all assuming it's the Bushies.


5 posted on 11/17/2005 6:21:58 PM PST by rightinthemiddle (#1 Rule in Dealing with the Media, Democrats and Terrorists: Can't Please 'Em, so Don't Appease 'Em.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Herodian
Please note this does not necessarily mean 'Bush administration sources'. It may mean Clinton administration sources as well.

The MSM would never let you get away with such a hypothesis!! Everyone knows it means the evil Bush & Cheney Admin

6 posted on 11/17/2005 6:23:01 PM PST by p23185 (Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

Thanks, this is the best writing yet on this subject.


7 posted on 11/17/2005 6:23:16 PM PST by ConservativeGreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

This whole thing is quite silly. CIA info is not secret to the White House. If you send your husband on a mission and he comes back LYING that Dick Cheney sent him, obviously people are going to mention what really happened. Seems to me she is a villain at a tile of war for not stepping forward to set the record straight. And she is such a creep that she still hasn't done so.


8 posted on 11/17/2005 6:26:47 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

No kidding. I am thinking it is correct. The CIA should be disbanded, and another agency (or few) take over its duties.


9 posted on 11/17/2005 6:29:07 PM PST by Miss Marple (Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's son and keep him strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
The CIA had intelligence screwed up royally before 9/11. It has been trying to cover up matters ever since. The libs who castrated the CIA during the Clinton years, during the administration that opposed a funtional CIA, who now occupy the seats at Foggy Bottom and elsewhere only to get a paycheck and who still oppose a useful espionage agency, are plotting the discrediting of GWB and this administration. They do so to protect their own joke jobs as evidenced by Valerie Plame recommending her liar husband for a job for which he was not competent.

The CIA has become anti-American. Is that possible?

10 posted on 11/17/2005 6:30:15 PM PST by TheGeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
"..It appears that Woodward's source outed Woodward to Fitzgerald, and Woodward gave sworn testimony to Fitzgerald this past Monday..."

If that is true Woodward's source can't be Chaney.

11 posted on 11/17/2005 6:32:09 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

Wow! The article speculates that the source was Colin Powell! Now I'm sure Fitzgerald is dying to indict Powell. Not. And I'm sure people can easily say Powell was part of a smear campaign. Not.


12 posted on 11/17/2005 6:32:16 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

I'm starting to see a split forming in the media - one camp that will rally around Woodward and his status as the man who brought down Nixon (this group will twist itself into impossible mental knots trying to reconcile Woodward's and Wilson's stories), and another camp that will believe that Woodward "sold out" to the Bush Administration and will try to "convince" him that it's time to retire ala Judith Miller.

Hard to say which side will win, but I would give the edge to the ones who want to drum Woodward out of the corps and go down with joe Wilson's sinking ship. However, Bob Woodward is no Judith Miller, and he surely won't go that easily.


13 posted on 11/17/2005 6:36:42 PM PST by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

.

This is so exciting. The saga of Bob Woodward: From Watergate to Woodygate.

.

14 posted on 11/17/2005 6:42:55 PM PST by Jackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

.

Bob Woodward let Bubber skate. I hope Woody gets clobbered over this!

.

15 posted on 11/17/2005 6:45:17 PM PST by Jackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC

Also at stake is the decades old war between the Washington Post and the New York Times to determine which of them is the newspaper of record.

Most liberals would say the Times, but it was the Post that broke the Watergate story, and they've been living in that reflected glory ever since.

Pinch Sulzberger has been driving the Times into the gutter. He is the guy who befriended Judith Miller when she was first hired and evidently has now authorized firing her, if not demanding it. The folks at the Post must see a golden opportunity to finally go past their rival.


16 posted on 11/17/2005 6:45:39 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

"Defenders of Fitzgerald's indictment can argue that its charges that Libby lied still stand. But the differing recollections of Woodward and Pincus could strengthen a defense based on faulty memory, and Woodward's disclosure refutes the timeline that Fitzgerald presented at his press conference."

Well...it looks like Fitzgerald has some splanin to do.


17 posted on 11/17/2005 6:53:30 PM PST by Balata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jackie

Laura Ingraham's imitation of Woodward is hilarious.


18 posted on 11/17/2005 6:56:33 PM PST by Past Your Eyes (Hey, getta your tootsi frootsi ice-a cream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

So, why doe the LMSM just ask Mr. Powell a simple question, was it you who was Woodhead's source???????


19 posted on 11/17/2005 6:57:13 PM PST by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

It is comforting to know that he shares the same analysis of the situation that I do. I admire that man's mind.


20 posted on 11/17/2005 6:57:22 PM PST by McGavin999 (Reporters write the Truth, Journalists write "Stories")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson