Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House rejects troop pullout; Dems decry vote (Rep. Ford yells repub's making uncalled for attacks)
AP ^ | November 19, 2005 | AP

Posted on 11/19/2005 12:50:54 AM PST by Former Military Chick

WASHINGTON - The House on Friday overwhelmingly rejected calls for an immediate troop withdrawal from Iraq, a vote engineered by the Republicans that was intended to fail. Democrats derided the vote as a political stunt.

"Our troops have become the enemy. We need to change direction in Iraq," said Rep. John Murtha of Pennsylvania, a Democratic hawk whose call a day earlier for pulling out troops sparked a nasty, personal debate over the war.

The House voted 403-3 to reject a nonbinding resolution calling for an immediate troop withdrawal.

"We want to make sure that we support our troops that are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. We will not retreat," Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., said as the GOP leadership pushed the issue to a vote over the protest of Democrats.

It was the second time in less than a week that President Bush's Iraq policy stirred heated debate in Congress. On Tuesday, the Senate defeated a Democratic push for Bush to lay out a timetable for withdrawal.

Murtha, a 73-year-old Marine veteran decorated for combat service in Vietnam, issued his call for a troop withdrawal at a news conference on Thursday. In little more than 24 hours, Hastert and Republicans decided to put the question to the House.

Democrats said it was a political move and quickly decided to vote against it in an attempt to drain it of significance.

"A disgrace," declared House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

"The rankest of politics and the absence of any sense of shame," added Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the No. 2 House Democrat.

Republicans hoped to place Democrats in an unappealing position - either supporting a withdrawal that critics said would be precipitous or opposing it and angering voters who want an end to the conflict. They also hoped the vote could restore GOP momentum on an issue - the war - that has seen plummeting public support in recent weeks.

Democrats claimed Republicans were changing the meaning of Murtha's withdrawal proposal. He has said a smooth withdrawal would take six months.

At one point in the emotional debate, Rep. Jean Schmidt, R-Ohio, told of a phone call she received from a Marine colonel.

"He asked me to send Congress a message - stay the course. He also asked me to send Congressman Murtha a message - that cowards cut and run, Marines never do," Schmidt said. Murtha is a 37-year Marine veteran.

Democrats booed and shouted her down - causing the House to come to a standstill.

Rep. Harold Ford, D-Tenn., charged across the chamber's center aisle screaming that Republicans were making uncalled-for personal attacks.

"You guys are pathetic! Pathetic!" yelled Rep. Marty Meehan, D-Mass.

Democrats gave Murtha a standing ovation as he entered the chamber and took his customary corner seat.

The fireworks, as lawmakers rushed toward a two-week Thanksgiving break, came just days after the GOP-controlled Senate defeated a Democratic push for Bush to lay out a timetable for withdrawal. Spotlighting questions from both parties about the war, senators approved a statement that 2006 should be a significant year in which conditions are created for the phased withdrawal of U.S. forces.

Murtha has proposed his own resolution, which would force the president to withdraw the nearly 160,000 troops in Iraq "at the earliest practicable date." It would establish a quick-reaction force and a nearby presence of Marines in the region. It also said the U.S. must pursue stability in Iraq through diplomacy.

The Republican alternative simply said: "It is the sense of the House of Representatives that the deployment of United States forces in Iraq be terminated immediately."

"It's just heinous," Rep. Ellen Tauscher, D-Calif., said of the Republican move.

"This is a personal attack on one of the best members, one of the most respected members of this House, and it is outrageous," said Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass.

Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, however, said the resolution vote was not a stunt. "This is not an attack on an individual. This is a legitimate question."

"They've been itching for a fight for a long time," Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., said of the Democrats.

Bush, traveling in Asia, also fired back at his critics, saying a troop withdrawal would be "a recipe for disaster."

Most Republicans oppose Murtha's call for withdrawal, and some Democrats also have been reluctant to back his position.

A growing number of House members and senators, looking ahead to off-year elections next November, are publicly worrying about a quagmire in Iraq. They have been staking out new positions on a war that is increasingly unpopular with the American public, has resulted in more than 2,000 U.S. military deaths and has cost more than $200 billion.

A U.S. field commander in Iraq countered the position of the congressman who usually backs the Pentagon.

"Here on the ground, our job is not done," said Col. James Brown, commander of the 56th Brigade Combat Team, when asked about Murtha's comments during a weekly briefing that American field commanders give to Pentagon reporters.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; calledtheirbluff; duncanhunter; haroldford; jeanschmidt; johnmurtha; murtha; nancypelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-117 next last
Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, however, said the resolution vote was not a stunt. "This is not an attack on an individual. This is a legitimate question."

'nough said!!

1 posted on 11/19/2005 12:50:55 AM PST by Former Military Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Of course if you were a Dim elected officeholder, stuck between Moveon.org and actual American public, you too would resent any move to make you declare your views on ANY ISSUE.


2 posted on 11/19/2005 1:02:18 AM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Murtha, a 73-year-old Marine veteran decorated for combat service in Vietnam,

I don't know this guy from Adam's house cat, and he may be a fine individual, however, John FnKerry is a decorated Vietnam war veteran, also.

3 posted on 11/19/2005 1:02:43 AM PST by cowboyway (My heroes have always been cowboys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

The Republicans HAD to bring this whole "war debate" to a head. The rats have been mounting a very effective campaign to use the war as a way to divert attention from the news they don't want America to hear - - terrific news about the economy.

It is critical to remember that the Democrat Party thrives on a bad economy - - what they want more than anything else is an economic recession in which people lose their jobs, their homes, and their savings. This is when the Democrats have the most success selling their vision of a Euro-style, secular-socialist welfare state. This is when they see their best chance of getting elected.

Their problem, their nightmare, has been that the economy is roaring - - the stock market is climbing, unemployment is virtually non-existant, and even oil prices are plummeting (I got my gas today at $2.09!). This is the worst possible news for the Democrats. All their best soundbites ("How will people afford to heat their homes this winter?", for example) are becoming obsolete.

And so, the Democrats have been left only with their old dependable fallback position of silently hoping like crazy for more and more filled U.S. military body-bags to provide them with the political fodder they needed to use against Bush and the Republicans - - until tonight.

With tonight's vote, the Democrats' harping about the war will ring hollow. Now the focus can turn back to the good economic news, as well as the tremendous progress that has actually been made in Iraq and in the war on global terrorism.

Tonight's vote was a tremendous poltical victory for the Republicans and for America. And the night was capped by the surprise live broadcast of President George W. Bush rallying the troops and the nation.

(P.S. Are the Democrats some very sick animals, or what??)


4 posted on 11/19/2005 1:32:58 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cowboyway

Yeah, I'm a little quizzical about this, too. I mean, Vietnam? The guy's only about five years younger than my WWII dad. How did Murtha miss Korea? I am willing to give the guy the benefit of the doubt, but I would be interested in a little more info about exactly what he did in Vietnam. I thought I heard that he had a couple of Purple Hearts?


5 posted on 11/19/2005 1:39:10 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Wolfgang_Blitzkrieg
Harold Ford was one of the few Democrats who were considered sane, but now even Ford is coming unglued

He's seeing his Presidential aspirations slowly go down the drain. Now he's on record opposing immediate withdrawal from Iraq, putting him at odds with the moonbat base of the Democrat party. So what does he do now -- wink, wink, nudge, nudge to the base? Or defend his vote on future Tim Russet-a-thons?

7 posted on 11/19/2005 1:54:52 AM PST by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

Forget about his presidential aspirations, he's watching his Senatorial aspirations circle the drain.


8 posted on 11/19/2005 2:08:31 AM PST by Steve_Stifler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

No, he can simply say he supported the pullout before he opposed it.


9 posted on 11/19/2005 2:10:53 AM PST by Ethan_Allen1777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All
"the GOP leadership pushed the issue to a vote over the protest of Democrats."

Goodness! Democrats protesting a vote...on which they voted in near unanimity.

10 posted on 11/19/2005 2:13:46 AM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
"The House voted 403-3 to reject a nonbinding resolution calling for an immediate troop withdrawal.
...
It was the second time in less than a week that President Bush's Iraq policy stirred heated debate in Congress."

403 to 3 is a "heated debate?!"

BWA HA HA!

11 posted on 11/19/2005 2:15:57 AM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfgang_Blitzkrieg; GailA
"Harold Ford was one of the few Democrats who were considered sane, but now even Ford is coming unglued."

Some of us here in Tennessee know the Fords very well, and Ford has "posed" as whatever he "needed" to be to move up. He's nothing but a puppet of his daddy, coming from a chronically corrupt and ethically vacant radical leftist family. As for Murtha, a Watergate baby (as was Junior's daddy), he's finally demonstrated his true stripes as a traitor.

12 posted on 11/19/2005 2:34:46 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (*Fightin' the system like a $2 hooker on crack*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wolfgang_Blitzkrieg

Don't assume anything good about Ford. Like Al Gore, he is from a political family, and I believe will shape everything he does around what will further his career. Just remember that Congressman Gore was pro-life, fiscal conservative, and NRA rated "A".

The thing I find interesting in all this is that if you say to a democrat, "You are wrong," they start this "personal attack" accusation. That is obviously in their playbook. I never heard anyone accuse Murtha of being anything but wrong. The worst thing that was said about him was that the administration was perplexed that he had adopted the same position as Michael Moore. This is simply a statement of fact. He did adopt this position, and it is very inconsistent with his past actions.


13 posted on 11/19/2005 2:36:27 AM PST by TN4Liberty (American... conservative... southern.... It doesn't get any better than this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

There's already a $hitstorm brewing in Memphis, as Junior's Aunt just stole a State Senate seat by a dozen votes in a heavily uber-Rat district and may be overturned by our GOP State Senate shortly. His own base of power is crumbling and the State 'Rats may be quite ready to yank the carpet out from underneath his feet for next year's US Senate race nomination. Personally, I want to see him get the nomination so we can utterly destroy him statewide.


14 posted on 11/19/2005 2:38:31 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (*Fightin' the system like a $2 hooker on crack*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
The House voted 403-3 to reject a nonbinding resolution calling for an immediate troop withdrawal.

Good – called their bluff. With all the rhetoric about pulling out, few wanted to go on record as wishing to raise the French Flag.
15 posted on 11/19/2005 2:44:24 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Hehehehehehehe....can't say it better. :-)

Great move finally by Hastert and Blunt!

When will FRIST develop such backbone?

I am waiting for some hint that Frist is the majority leader.


16 posted on 11/19/2005 2:46:33 AM PST by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Well, don't look for logic in DeamonRATS positions.


17 posted on 11/19/2005 2:47:56 AM PST by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Exactly. What the media really means is that it sparked heated screams in the halls of congress from the Dummy heads, but resulted in a tame common sense vote at the end.

Shame on the Lo$er DEMs and the media.


18 posted on 11/19/2005 2:53:58 AM PST by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
"This is a personal attack on one of the best members, one of the most respected members of this House, and it is outrageous," said Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass."

I'm sure the Democrats would say that they have not personally attacked President Bush.

We've known it all along: when you call the Democrats' bluff, they scream "Personal Attack! Personal Attack! You guys aren't playing fair! Sob, sob, sob!"

19 posted on 11/19/2005 2:54:51 AM PST by Night Hides Not (1 John 3:18 (my interpretation: Deeds, Not Words"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cowboyway

Murtha has certainly turned to the "dark side". There must be something in the Washington water. Certainly being a DemonRat doesn't help one's sanity - as Rush says: "Still voting Democrat - your stuck on stupid".

However, Murtha's early military career is not questionable. From an earlier post:
>>"He learned about military service from the bottom up, beginning as a raw recruit when he left Washington and Jefferson College in 1952 to join the Marines out of a growing sense of obligation to his country during the Korean War. There he earned the American Spirit Honor Medal, awarded to fewer than one in 10,000 recruits. He rose through the ranks to become a drill instructor at Parris Island and was selected for Officer Candidate School at Quantico, Virginia. He then was assigned to the Second Marine Division, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. In 1959, Captain Murtha took command of the 34th Special Infantry Company, Marine Corps Reserves, in Johnstown.

He remained in the Reserves after his discharge from active duty until he volunteered for Vietnam in 1966-67, receiving the Bronze Star with Combat "V", two Purple Hearts and the Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry. He remained in the Reserves until his retirement." <<


20 posted on 11/19/2005 3:01:52 AM PST by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

The dims can dish it out but can't take it. Ex presidents going overseas and cheap shotting the military and the president. Total wusses.


21 posted on 11/19/2005 3:09:35 AM PST by tkathy (Ban the headscarf. (All religious headdress). The effect will creat a huge domino effect..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
"At one point in the emotional debate, Rep. Jean Schmidt, R-Ohio, told of a phone call she received from a Marine colonel.

"He asked me to send Congress a message - stay the course. He also asked me to send Congressman Murtha a message - that cowards cut and run, Marines never do," Schmidt said. Murtha is a 37-year Marine veteran.
"


Finally! There was something on TV last night.


I remember Barry Goldwater was a staunch Conservative also until he grew old and became a staunch "Confusative".

I suggest that Murtha is suffering the same malady.



22 posted on 11/19/2005 3:12:21 AM PST by G.Mason (Better stand up and fight GWB ... the enemy is knocking on your door)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
A very large can of Republican whoop ass was opened up on the demoncrats yesterday. We pulled them along by the short hairs on this one, and they looked like fools.
23 posted on 11/19/2005 3:26:04 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

One simple question: If Clinton were President and we were fighting in Iraq, would Murtha and his merry band of Liberal pals be waving the white flag?


24 posted on 11/19/2005 3:31:24 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
The following voted for the immediate troop withdrawal resolution:
Three Democrats, Jose Serrano of New York, Robert Wexler of Florida and Cynthia McKinney of Georgia, voted for withdrawal. Six voted present: Reps. Jim McDermott of Washington; Jerrold Nadler, Maurice Hinchey and Major Owens of New York; Michael Capuano of Massachusetts and William Lacy Clay of Missouri.
25 posted on 11/19/2005 3:39:11 AM PST by balticbeau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
The House voted 403-3

For some reason, I don't think DU is going to be very happy about this, LOL!

26 posted on 11/19/2005 3:42:26 AM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

I filled up several days ago at 2.02. Now it is 1.99.


27 posted on 11/19/2005 3:44:23 AM PST by mathluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: balticbeau

If McDermott won't even vote for withdrawal, that says a lot.


28 posted on 11/19/2005 3:46:25 AM PST by mathluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sd-joe

After watching Murtha yesterday, I came to the conclusion that his recent trip to Iraq has caused him to lose the last few marbles that the DemonRats aren't playing with already. I think that the emotional toll of seeing combat again, visiting Walter Reed has ripped his spine from him.

I don't question the man's service to this country and he has always been a hawk so something had to have changed. I really think he has just snapped. Unfortunately, the ghouls in the media and his party have seized on it, much like they did with that media whore Mother Sheehan.


29 posted on 11/19/2005 3:56:58 AM PST by Uddercha0s
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

How did Murtha vote?

How can we find out who voted for the pullout?

Did any Representatives abstain?

Answers to these questions will come in handy in the future.

And by the way, Murtha was not a hawk as he is represented to be by the "propaganda ministry of the insurgency" (old media).

From Newsmax:
In fact, Murtha began advocating a cut-and-run strategy way back in May 2004 - after U.S. forces had been in Iraq just a little more than a year.

30 posted on 11/19/2005 4:04:57 AM PST by Texas Jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

You can get a Purple Heart for a sliver. In fact, if you get enough, you can go home. Ask John Kerry.


31 posted on 11/19/2005 4:05:33 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

I believe he was in Korea too.


32 posted on 11/19/2005 4:06:12 AM PST by toddlintown (Lennon takes six bullets to the chest, Yoko is standing right next to him and not one f'ing bullet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Was the coward Murtha one of the three or did he become a coward again?


33 posted on 11/19/2005 4:07:00 AM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfgang_Blitzkrieg
Harold Jr. belongs to the most politically corrupt family in the country. DO NOT BE FOOLED BY HIS SOOMTH MOUTH.
34 posted on 11/19/2005 4:15:54 AM PST by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, Over there, we will be there until it is Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cowboyway

I've never heard of Murtha either, but because of his opposition to the war the MSM now refers to him as a "well respected member of Congress." I wonder who coaxed Murtha to make his public announcement, that commie Nancy Pelosi?


35 posted on 11/19/2005 4:18:17 AM PST by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: balticbeau

Those who voted aye and present are members of the Democratic Socialists of America (Marxists) and the House Progressive Caucus (Marxist).


36 posted on 11/19/2005 4:19:10 AM PST by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

"Rep. Harold Ford, D-Tenn., charged across the chamber's center aisle screaming that Republicans were making uncalled-for personal attacks."

Payback is hell ain't it Harold, you wussie!


37 posted on 11/19/2005 4:20:04 AM PST by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balticbeau

Cynthia McKinney is a usual suspect, but at least she had the guts to actually vote "no". The "present" voters represent the worst of the worst of what is wrong with some of the folks in our government.


38 posted on 11/19/2005 4:27:03 AM PST by manwiththehands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: All
Vote -> http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2005/roll608.xml

McKinney, Serrano, Wexler voted NO.

Capuano, Clay, Hinchey, McDermott, Nadler Owens voted PRESENT.

Beauprez, Berman, Boswell, Boyd, Camp, Cunningham, Davis (AL), Flake, Fossella, Gallegly, Hall, Jindal, Kind, LaHood, Miller, Gary, Moran (KS), Northup, Paul, Peterson (PA), Shadegg, Towns, Young (AK) were NOT VOTING

39 posted on 11/19/2005 4:33:45 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

This is my first post after reading for months. So tell me if I don't do something right.

"Their problem, their nightmare, has been that the economy is roaring..."

This comment is so true. The democrats have a vested interest in things going badly. The sad thing is that many people start believing these things after they have been blindly repeated by CNN, etc. a thousand times.

$2.09 for a gallon of gas is pretty good. According to the Department of Energy's website, the price of a gallon of gas (nationwide average) as of 11-14-05 is $2.296. Stocks are at thier highest level in 4 1/2 years. The price of oil is at a 5-month low, and the GDP in the 3rd quarter was a VERY healthy 3.8%. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the unempoyment rate in September 2005 is lower than the average unemployment rate during all of the "golden" Clinton years (5.1% vs 5.2%). So what gives?

"...the Democrats have been left only with their old dependable fallback position of silently hoping like crazy for more and more filled U.S. military body-bags..."

Just like they were praying for more dead in New Orleans during Katrina. "More dead" translates into "Bush is stupid" in their minds.

"With tonight's vote, the Democrats' harping about the war will ring hollow."

Isn't this exactly the vote that the democrats wanted? They have been saying forever that the American people WANT us to pull out of Iraq. Now, when they get a chance to put their money where their mouth is, they balk.

The media breathlessly reported Congressman Murtha's comments as a call for "immediate" withdrawal. That includes the NYT and AlJazeera, which highlighted his comments on the front page.

How much do you want to bet that now the NYT tries to frame Murtha's comments as a "gradual" withdrawal? Or a withdrawal "over 6-months"? They will do this because they will want to paint the vote last night as not being on Murtha's proposal (as if HIS proposal would have been passed).

One thing I noticed is that the media did everything they could to NOT report the vote. The BBC, as far as I can tell, has NOTHING on their website about it, and CNN buried it in the side bar (with a story about Robert Blake as the main story), while CBS reported it as "House Rejects GOP Withdrawal Plan" (I paraphrased that since the headline is no longer up).

Well, this is my first post. I hope I did it right.

Jim in Chicago
:)












40 posted on 11/19/2005 4:34:35 AM PST by Chicago_Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
The only "stunt" played out last night is the on-going one of the democrats using the troops as political fodder. In order to appear strong on defense, they vote one way and then do everything they can to demean and demoralize the troops they have sent into harms way.

The dems overwhelmingly voted for the change of Iraq regime in 1998. Then in the WOT, the dems voted again approving the liberation of Iraq. They vote for military action, but once it starts, the dems turn on the troops and squeal about prison abuse, too many casualties, not enough armor, bad strategy, lying commander in chief, this is the wrong war!
41 posted on 11/19/2005 4:37:23 AM PST by chgomac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
Good – called their bluff. With all the rhetoric about pulling out, few wanted to go on record as wishing to raise the French Flag.

"Hey! I wesent that wemawk about the Fwench Fag!" - Barney Fwank (D) Massachusetts

42 posted on 11/19/2005 4:37:45 AM PST by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
It is critical to remember that the Democrat Party thrives on a bad economy - - what they want more than anything else is an economic recession in which people lose their jobs, their homes, and their savings.

As difficult as it is to believe, what you say is so true.

I have pondered many times as to not only why this is true, but HOW it can become a politically tenable position. I think I have the answer.

The Democratic constituencey is composed of public sector employees, teachers, welfare and other recipients of tax-transfer payments, journalists, and union bosses. In short, these are people for whom PROSPERITY IS SOMETHING WHICH HAPPENS TO EVERYBODY ELSE.

Unlike the contractor, or the car salesman, the construction worker, or anyone who depends on commercial activity for their livlihood and their economic status, these people must vote in those who would vote for, what they receive monetarily. Upturns in economic activity is a tide which raises all boats...except theirs. ENVY is the operative emotion here. This huge and growing constituency has to sit back in stasis economically while EVERYONE ELSE benefits disproportionately, in their eyes, from GDP growth.

This is why policies like tax cuts which "go to" our nation's employers and investors are seen as anathema to their interests, as they are indeed mired in a zero-sum predicament, IMHO.

43 posted on 11/19/2005 4:39:56 AM PST by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Just because someone serves many years in the military and the reserves does not make them a hero. Unfortunately, some officers and senior enlisted remain in the military because they know darn well they can't make it in civilian life. During my 26 years I encountered many more than my share of these zeros. As for the present dust up with Mr. Murtha, he was whining to Chrissie Boy Mathews about the war long before now. He claims to have 37 years in the Marines and he's a Lt. Col.? A real rate grabber! I'm not questioning his service, remember Adm. Stockdale, things happen to the brain in many people when you get older. As for Imus's butt buddy, Mr. Ford, he needs to go back and hide in the woodpile as he is not ready for grown up conversations/


44 posted on 11/19/2005 4:47:46 AM PST by BTCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
"Our troops have become the enemy. We need to change direction in Iraq," said Rep. John Murtha

Our troops are always the "enemy" to enemy forces when we invade a nation, you old fool. I can't believe this guy is a veteran.

45 posted on 11/19/2005 4:50:38 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfgang_Blitzkrieg
Murtha proposed an immediate withdrawal from Iraq, the idea is put to a vote, it's voted down, and the Democrats are still seething with hate.

My oh my, how painfully difficult it is for the Dims to be asked to vote on their own trash talking words.
Now they're on public record, "Yes, I voted against the immediate troop withdrawal, BUT I've spent months criticizing the war effort and suggesting immediate withdrawal."
Oh boy!

Rep. Harold Ford, D-Tenn., charged across the chamber's center aisle screaming...

46 posted on 11/19/2005 4:52:05 AM PST by ThirstyMan (hysteria: the elixir of the Left that trumps all reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

A thread last night said that Murtha received his purple hearts for two wounds, one above his left eye and another one on his cheek. Neither involved hospitalization.


47 posted on 11/19/2005 4:52:45 AM PST by Atlantian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Atlantian

Democrat Screams are the true barometer of Success.


48 posted on 11/19/2005 4:53:50 AM PST by stocksthatgoup (Polls = Proof that when the MSM want your opinion it will give it to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

"Personally, I want to see him get the nomination so we can utterly destroy him statewide."

My sentiments too. No doubt he will get the DUmmies nomination.


49 posted on 11/19/2005 5:22:17 AM PST by wingman1 (University of Vietnam 1970. Forget? Hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hershey

"One simple question: If Clinton were President and we were fighting in Iraq, would Murtha and his merry band of Liberal pals be waving the white flag?"

The DUmmies have politicized this war. They want us to lose. The answer to your question is no.


50 posted on 11/19/2005 5:29:55 AM PST by wingman1 (University of Vietnam 1970. Forget? Hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson