Posted on 11/25/2005 6:41:59 PM PST by writer33
I have enough deer in my back lot to last me all winter.
I seem to recall learning that sunspots were relatively cool spots on the sun's surface. Has that interpretation now been reversed? Any solar astronomers in the house?
The sunspots *themselves* are relatively cool, but while they're active, the *rest* of the Sun exhibits more magnetic and other kinds of energy activity.
During an uncharacteristically long 75-year period with virtually no sunspots (1645-1715), there was a "little ice age" of severely cold weather on Earth.
I think we'll go see CHICKEN LITTLE...
I Have 10 face cords of wood for my wood stove. Wish this alleged global warming would kick in.
Sounds as though 'Chicken Little' has been at work again.
Gee, only 2340 miles thick! It sounds as if someone should've gone back to fifth grade and check his/her answers.
Ten miles up and you're pretty well out of atmosphere, as I recall.
HF
Welcome to FreeRepublic, newbie!
But outside the Democrat cloakroom the air was normal...
I caught that too, I think the folks that put up the website reference mistook a decimal point for a comma, it should read 12,000 feet thick. Even that seems like a large number, but I've seen it referenced elsewhere and I belive it to be in the range of a number of estimates.
Too late, he's vaporized already.
Gone quicker than a melting glacier!
:)
That happenned over at the $500 Gold thread...
Let's not mention rotting forests, volcanoes,...HILARIOUS!
But my green plants will!
I heard a snipet on the radio that Israelis say the CO2 is greening their deserts. That fits my conviction that earth, not politicians will deal with the problem best.
That sounds pretty impressive, until you realize:
1. CO2 levels have spiked to near-modern levels several times during that period, it's not like the current level is a sudden skyrocket from a historically low figure:
(Note, this chart is sort of "backwards" from what people are used to seeing -- today's figures are on the far *left*, and the X-axis goes *back* in time, not forward in time, as you go further to the right.)
2. Also, "650,000 years" sounds like practically forever, but it's less than A THOUSANDTH of the time that life has been on Earth. I'd be more impressed if they could have said that modern CO2 levels were the highest in 10-100 *million* years. And while it's harder to get definitive readings on CO2 levels farther back, here's a chart combining the results of several different methods of estimating CO2 levels of the past several hundred million years:
Note that the timespan of the *entire* first chart (above) would take up only the reddish "smudge" on the *far* right edge of *this* graph, and that by most indications, CO2 levels in the more distant past were *MANY* multiples of today's level.
Now it's true that Earth was also pretty much a sauna at those times, also, and we probably don't want to go *that* far, but it is interesting to note that life on Earth (in the oceans, anyway) has managed to survive through CO2 levels that were TEN to TWENTY times as high as those today, and life on land has gotten through times of CO2 5-10 times higher than today.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.