Posted on 11/26/2005 3:12:03 AM PST by F14 Pilot
Amen to bombing Al-Jazeera. This creep could have pointed out that Bush is accused of planning THAT, too.
Meanwhile, kidnap his a$$ and send HIM to Guantanamo.
This nauseating creep WANTS America to be attacked!
"This nauseating creep WANTS America to be attacked!"
Of course if he doesn't support such stand he wouldn't be able to work for al-Jazeera in the first place!
"Of course if he doesn't support such stand he wouldn't be able to work for al-Jazeera in the first place!"
He doesn't work for al-Jazeera.
Hey Moron Leftists, explain 9-11 if it is all about "unjust" American policies. How come after 8 years of your "enlighten" rule under BJ Clinton did the Islamic Fascists decide to attack us on 9-11? You might want to reconsider serving as the propaganda mouthpieces for the Islamists mass murders Lefties. If there IS a nuclear 9-11, the people we ARE going to hold accountable are the SAME Hysteric Leftist like this author who are spending all their time whining about the USA.
All I can say is these people better pray that America doesn't have a nuclear attack on its soil.
If they think we're weak now, that our armed services are at their limits, they have no idea what we would be capable of doing. No one, and I mean no one would stand in our way after that. Not Russia, not China and not the EU.
After the First World War, the Treaty of Versailles punished Germany harshly, producing hardship and hostility that the Nazis exploited. But after the Second World War, when the Marshall Plan helped rebuild Germany and Japan, the US did more to promote democracy than at any time during the Cold War.
Another bit of Leftists historic revision. By 1960, the extreme Left in Germany, France, and Japan organized massive anti-American protests against our presence in those countries. The Left hoped, of course, that a quick pull-out of U.S. military would allow those countries to easily fall under Soviet or Red Chinese control.
Nothing changes. Fifty years later, the Left is still hoping for defeat of the U.S..
this sounds like a warning to me
Ok John Lennon, then what should America do after the death cult attacks the "next" time. Sorry John, global jihad is winner take all.
Is this guy wearing Pampers or are they around his head?
Definately growing older hasn't made him wiser!
More Hate America propaganda. No WMDS were supplied to the Iraqs by the USA. Look at all the UN Inspections. All WMDs came from Russia or Europe, none from us. This is one of the "Big Lies" of the Hate America crowd. They tell a lie and just scream it over and over until it become " a known fact".
What communist crap. Might as well hang yourself before implementing this:
It's always a pleasure to see leftists relying on the strategies that are currently failing.
The significance of Bush acknowledging anything regarding his predecessors would be as important as this guy acknowledging his responsibility for suppressing the forces of social justice in Central America... i.e. none at all. What it would do is provide a concession people like this would attempt to parlay into a "admission of guilt."
This is all a philosophical shell-game ignoring countries have interests, and those interests change.
How this guy got to be a billionaire peddling asininities as vapid as "Well you married her in the first place. How can you want to divorce her now" I'll never know.
This man is an example of why I have come to theorize the existence of what I think of as "the crusading coward."
There seems to be a certain type of personality that desperately wishes to see themselves as fearless warriors for "good," yet they lack the intestinal fortitude to oppose any group or individual that may actually do them harm. As a consequence of this internal conflict, they sublimate these drives into a contrivance whereby they may discover "evil" in fairly harmless places.
Aside from such a theorized personality type, I can't understand why such people would insist on becoming involved, but always seem to get involved as apologists for those who practice violence as a policy tool.
It is not inconceivable that America practices some sort of Machiavellian policy game, but if we do, why do the accusers never have any more compelling evidence than slogans like "Bush lied" or nebulous accusations that require a trip to the library to verify?
Looks like this sicko underwent a "David Brock" type of epiphany.
Wow, I know several of that exact personality. You just nailed it.
Saddam was the power behing the throne in Iraq since 1968. He seized direct power in 1979. How did RR and Bush 1 "create" Saddam 12 years prior to their 1980 electoral victory?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.