Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Guns, Gun Ownership, & RTC at All-Time Highs, Less "Gun Control," and Violent Crime at 30-Year Low
NRA-ILA ^ | 11/1/2005 | NA

Posted on 11/30/2005 8:25:06 PM PST by neverdem


11250 Waples Mill Road    ·Fairfax, Virginia 22030    ·800-392-8683
www.NRAILA.org

Guns, Gun Ownership, & RTC at All-Time Highs, Less "Gun Control," and Violent Crime at 30-Year Low

Guns.

The number of privately owned guns in the U.S. is at an all-time high. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) estimates that there were about 215 million guns in 1999,1 when the number of new guns was averaging about 4.5 million (about 2%) annually.2 A report for the National Academy of Sciences put the 1999 figure at 258 million.3 According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, there were 60.4 million approved (new and used) NICS firearm transactions between 1994 2004.4 The number of NICS checks for firearm purchases or permits increased 3.2% between 2003-2004.

Gun Owners.

The number of gun owners is also at an all-time high. The U.S. population is at an all-time high (294 million), and rises about 1% annually.5 Numerous surveys over the last 40+ years have found that almost half of all households have at least one gun owner.6 Some surveys since the late 1990s have indicated a smaller incidence of gun ownership,7 probably because of some respondents` concerns about "gun control," residually due, perhaps, to the anti-gun policies of the Clinton Administration.

Right-to-Carry.

The number of RTC states is at an all-time high, up from 10 in 1987 to 38 today.8 In 2004, states with RTC laws, compared to other states, had lower violent crime rates on average. Total violent crime was lower by 21%, murder by 28%, robbery by 43%, and aggravated assault by 13%.9

"Less Gun Control."

Violent crime has declined while many "gun control" laws have been eliminated or made less restrictive. Many states have eliminated prohibitory or restrictive carry laws, in favor of Right-to-Carry laws. The federal Brady Act`s waiting period on handgun sales ended in 1998, in favor of the NRA-supported National Instant Check, and some states thereafter eliminated waiting periods, purchase permit requirements, or other laws delaying gun sales. The federal "assault weapon" ban expired in 2004. All states now have hunter protection laws, 46 have range protection laws, 46 prohibit local jurisdictions from imposing gun laws more restrictive than state law, 44 protect the right to arms in their constitutions, and 33 prohibit frivolous lawsuits against the firearm industry.10

Studies by and for Congress, the Congressional Research Service, the Library of Congress, the National Institute of Justice, the National Academy of Sciences, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and even researchers who support "gun control," have found no evidence that "gun control" reduces crime.11

Crime.

The FBI reports that the nation`s total violent crime rate declined every year between 1991 2004.12 In 2004, the violent crime rate fell to a 30-year low, lower than any time since 1974. The murder rate fell to a 39-year low, lower than any time since 1965. The 2004 robbery and aggravated assault rates were lower than any time since 1968 and 1984, respectively. Since 1991, total violent crime has decreased 39%; murder and non-negligent manslaughter, 44%; rape, 24%; robbery, 50%; and aggravated assault, 33%.13 Between 2003-2004, the violent crime rate declined 2.2%.14 Concurrently, the most recent Bureau of Justice Statistics crime victimization survey found that violent crime is lower than anytime since 1973, when the first such survey was conducted.15

Notes

1. BATF, "Crime Gun Trace Reports (1999) National Report," Nov. 2000, p. ix (www.atf.gov/firearms/ycgii/1999/index.htm).
2. BATF, "Firearms Commerce in the United States 2001/2002" (www.atf.gov/pub/index.htm#Firearms).
3. National Research Council, Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review, National Academies Press, 2005.
4. BJS, "Background Checks for Firearm Transfers, 2004" (http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov./bjs/pub/pdf/bcft04.pdf).
5. Bureau of the Census (http://www.census.gov/popest/states/NST-ann-est.html).
6. Gary Kleck, Targeting Firearms, Aldine de Gruyter, 1997, pp. 94, 98-100.
7. E.g., BJS Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 2002, Table 2.58, (www.albany.edu/sourcebook/).
8. See NRA RTC fact sheet (within www.nraila.org/Issues/Filter.aspx?ID=003).
9. See FBI, Crime in the United States 2004 (http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/ucr.htm#cius) for state crime statistics.
10. See NRA-ILA Compendium of State Firearms Laws (www.nraila.org/media/misc/compendium.htm). Also, note that in October 2005, federal legislation prohibiting such lawsuits was signed into law.
11. Federal "assault weapon" ban: Roth, Koper, et al., Impact Evaluation of the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act of 1994, March 13, 1997 (www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=406797); Reedy and Koper, "Impact of handgun types on gun assault outcomes: a comparison of gun assaults involving semiautomatic pistols and revolvers," Injury Prevention 2003, (http://ip.bmjjournals.com/cgi/reprint/9/2/151); Koper et al., Report to the National Institute of Justice, An Updated Assessment of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban: Impacts on Gun Markets and Gun Violence, 1994-2003, June 2004 (www.sas.upenn.edu/jerrylee/jlc-new/Research/Koper_aw_final.pdf); Wm. J. Krouse, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, "Semiautomatic Assault Weapons Ban," Dec. 16, 2004. "Gun control," generally: Library of Congress, Report for Congress: Firearms Regulations in Various Foreign Countries, May 1998, LL98-3, 97-2010; Task Force on Community Preventive Service, "First Reports Evaluating the Effectiveness of Strategies for Preventing Violence: Firearms Laws," Morbidity and Mortaility Weekly Report, Oct. 3, 2003 (www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5214a2.htm); National Research Council, Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review, National Academies Press, 2005 (http://books.nap.edu/books/0309091241/html/index.html).
12. Note 9 and BJS (http://bjsdata.ojp.usdoj.gov/dataonline/). See also FBI (http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel05/crimestat101705.htm).
13. Note 10. Condensed at www.nraila.org, click on "Research," then "Crime Statistics."
14. Note 12.
15. BJS (http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov./bjs/pub/press/cv04pr.htm).

Posted: 11/1/2005



Find this item at: http://www.nraila.org/Issues/FactSheets/Read.aspx?ID=126


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; rkba
Concealed-carry laws change today (NM) Watch out for Bill Richardson and Mark Warner (VA) in 2008.
1 posted on 11/30/2005 8:25:08 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Imagine that! More guns, less Crime. Hey, that would make a good title for a book.

Conservatives were right again. What else is new?


2 posted on 11/30/2005 8:33:38 PM PST by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

haha...I was in New Mexico in 2001. Listening to the radio, I heard then-mayor Baca (?) rail against concealed carry.


3 posted on 11/30/2005 8:40:02 PM PST by rudy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; King Prout; ..
I think some folks will appreciate those referenced statistics.

Crescent design for Sept. 11 memorial replaced

I'm not sure that this design has been changed enough.

From time to time, I’ll ping on noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs. FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

4 posted on 11/30/2005 9:31:00 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

good news. now we have to work on getting the other 12 states to get ccw laws.


5 posted on 11/30/2005 9:54:53 PM PST by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

We love the NRA.


6 posted on 12/01/2005 1:36:14 AM PST by MarMema (http://www.curenikolette.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

Amen to that.

They get it done.

By the way, the timing of the article is for Wisconsin.


7 posted on 12/01/2005 5:12:49 AM PST by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
By the way, the timing of the article is for Wisconsin.

Things are rockin'-n-rollin' here. I'm starting to get pretty optimistic about our chances here.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1531396/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1531784/posts


8 posted on 12/01/2005 5:21:12 AM PST by Ladysmith ((NRA, SAS) Support Zien's PPA/CCW bill in Wisconsin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"I agree with the law, but if I feel I need a gun I'll just carry it where people can see it."

When I passed through New Mexico back in 1982 I saw a lot of people carrying openly – but I stayed away from the large cities (are there any in NM?) and stayed with the small towns.
9 posted on 12/01/2005 5:25:54 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Dear BATFE,

I have a bottle of scotch, a .308 and two packs of Marlboro's. Should I use tnt or c4?


10 posted on 12/01/2005 5:41:19 AM PST by KarinG1 (Some of us are trying to engage in philosophical discourse. Please don't allow us to interrupt you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It seems like Rita had a hand in increasing gun ownership.


11 posted on 12/01/2005 5:55:40 AM PST by stevio (Red-Blooded American Male (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
good news. now we have to work on getting the other 12 states to get ccw laws.

Or we could just bear our arms as we please, as our Constitution tells us we can.

We don't need to start asking more state governments to give us permission to carry our weapons.

12 posted on 12/01/2005 6:19:44 AM PST by BostonianRightist ("Moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue." ~ Senator Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BostonianRightist
Or we could just bear our arms as we please, as our Constitution tells us we can >>

hey, I agree with you but that's not the reality of the issue today, and now I publicly challenge you to go to NYC with your rifle in tow and walk with it down Broadway and see how you convince the NYPD and judge on your constitutional rights and the right to carry. Don't forget to report back here from Rikers Island with your report.
13 posted on 12/01/2005 8:45:16 AM PST by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
When I passed through New Mexico back in 1982 I saw a lot of people carrying openly

The great State of NM has no problem with open carry, I lived in ABQ for several years in the 90's. As long as you check your guns and knives at the bars and Walmart you're OK.

The difference is with the RTC it doesn't have to be visible anymore. I seem to recall that one has to take an approved course of instruction at a cost of $150-200 bucks or so.

14 posted on 12/01/2005 8:55:22 AM PST by Cliff Dweller ("get thar fustest with the mostest." GEN NB Forrest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Unfortunately you're right.

I am going to Broadway this saturday, but I live in MA where we don't have the right to own firearms. So i'll go rifleless in Manhattan (keeping a hand on my knife and wallet, with a vigilant eye on everyone around me).


15 posted on 12/01/2005 9:23:36 AM PST by BostonianRightist ("Moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue." ~ Senator Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BostonianRightist

Enjoy the city and be safe..

It's too bad America isn't the way it used to be.


16 posted on 12/01/2005 9:30:00 AM PST by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Good point. Gun control advocates, though well-intentioned, are hopeless naive. If someone is willing to disregard laws against murder, sexual assult, and robbery, they're not going to observe gun laws. But a criminal is far less likely to attack someone if they suspect that person has a gun.


17 posted on 12/01/2005 9:32:20 AM PST by Clintonfatigued (Sam Alito Deserves To Be Confirmed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R.W.Ratikal
Imagine that! More guns, less Crime. Hey, that would make a good title for a book.

Makes perfect sense to me. Criminals don't want to get shot.

Conservatives were right again. What else is new?

Yes, but no. Lest we never forget that 'Facts are to liberals as light/holy water/garlic is to vampires'. They will never let facts get in the way of whatever stupid crusade they happen to be on at the time. They will revise these facts to something like the following that suits their moron brigade:

"Gun ownership is at a 30-year high, and gun crimes in Chicago (for example) are at a 100 year high"
18 posted on 12/01/2005 10:17:22 AM PST by proud_yank (Experience Tolerance: tell a liberal you own guns and drive an SUV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

bump


19 posted on 12/01/2005 10:28:47 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

IMHO, the entire 'gun control' debate is pretty lame. These people, some well-intentioned, many insanely radical, make so many screams against gun ownership b/c:

"Guns are used to kill people"
"guns were originally made to kill people"
"Guns provide the means by which people kill"
"Gun accidents kill innocent people and children"

Hence, they should be banned or regulated. Point out to them that far more people are murdered by other means than guns, i.e. stabbing, beaten to death (fists, bat, stick, etc), so we should therefore regulate or ban baseball bats and knives?

And they still come back around to defend their stance on gun control, when guns aren't even the most common killer. Funny, I guess murder with a gun is worse than murder with a knife?


20 posted on 12/01/2005 10:36:25 AM PST by proud_yank (Experience Tolerance: tell a liberal you own guns and drive an SUV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
hey, I agree with you but that's not the reality of the issue today, and now I publicly challenge

I think his point is that we should be fighting to get gun control laws either repealed or declared unconsitutional. We should not be adding more laws that infringe on the inalienable right to keep and bear arms, even if the infringement would be less than under current laws.

21 posted on 12/01/2005 11:09:34 AM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cliff Dweller
I seem to recall that one has to take an approved course of instruction at a cost of $150-200 bucks or so.

Here the course is $50 and the filing fee is $50.
22 posted on 12/01/2005 1:40:52 PM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Hello? Great Britain? Are you listening?


23 posted on 12/01/2005 1:46:21 PM PST by TChris ("Unless you act, you're going to lose your world." - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I wish I lived in New Mexico. Here in NJ I am getting the run around for obtaining a purchaser's permit. The detective in my local PD that is conducting the background investigation is dragging her feet. First, she asked for proof of residence. Never mind I actually had to provide a copy of my driver's license with the application when I submitted it. She wanted me to give another copy and waited to tell me this for two weeks after I had originally submitted the application. No problem, I provided the additional copy of my license.

A week later she called me to say that there were "problems" with my references. I am trying to call her back to ask what the "problems" are, but the other trick she likes to pull is to call once and never follow up when I return her phone calls. She finally left a message blathering something about needing two more references and that the references I originally obtained were "different" whatever that means. I saw both references (the two friends who filled out the letters saved copies for me) and given what I saw, I can't tell you how they are "different" or what the hell the significance would be if they were. Each person might answer questions differently, but as long as nobody says I am a nutjob, wife beater or a boozer what is the problem. I am now being told I need two more references. Again, delay, delay, delay.

Oh, by the way, the questions asked on the reference letters are so biased as to be easily interpreted against the applicant. I will continue to play the game and give two more references. But I am getting the sense that there will be more "problems" no matter how anyone answers the questionnaire.
24 posted on 02/18/2007 3:59:45 PM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson