Skip to comments.Company Blocks Ads Critical of Ohio Rep. (Jean Schmidt)
Posted on 12/02/2005 3:29:59 PM PST by Jean S
WASHINGTON (AP) -- An advertising company that gives most of its political donations to Republicans blocked the Democratic National Committee from putting up billboards criticizing GOP Rep. Jean Schmidt of Ohio.
Lamar Advertising Co. of Baton Rouge, La., refused to put up two billboards in Portsmouth, Ohio, and another in Cincinnati with a picture of Schmidt and the following message: "Shame on you, Jean Schmidt: Stop attacking veterans. Keep your eye on the ball - we need a real plan for Iraq."
The billboards are the result of 7,000 donations, DNC executive director Tom McMahon said, after Schmidt attacked Pennsylvania Rep. John Murtha, a Democrat and Marine veteran, for his call for withdrawal from Iraq. Schmidt was booed off the House floor two weeks ago when she said "cowards cut and run, Marines never do."
She has since apologized.
Lamar's Huntington, W.Va., regional manager, Mark Watts, rejected the billboards criticizing Scmidt as a personal attack, said Hal Kinshaw, Lamar's vice president of governmental affairs.
Kilshaw said Lamar doesn't do many billboards for either Republicans or Democrats, but the company does have a political action committee that contributes to candidates. In 2004 elections, it gave Republicans 70 percent of its U.S. House race donations and 60 percent of its U.S. Senate race contributions.
The DNC says it went to Lamar because it controls the market in the area but is looking for other options
She's not attacking veterans, she's attacking a lilly-livered politician who is endangering the troops to protect his phony baloney job.
You hear that Murtha? Don't let Nancy's Knockers make you "take your eye off the ball" and go over to the Dark Side!
The democrats are so vile. Why would anyone ever be a democrat. They are so pathetic. Barf.
Because the evil, the stupid, and the mentally ill have to have a party of their own.
Demon-crats are liars, bullies, and cowards. Period.
And don't forget the just plain intellectually lazy and dishonest.
"And don't forget the just plain intellectually lazy and dishonest."
That kinda falls under the aegis of evil and stupid. ;-)
Let the Democrats spend as much money as they want attacking Congresswoman Jean Schmidt. All that will do is (i) remind people of how they started saying that we should cut and run from Iraq but then voted against it on the House floor and (ii) take money away from races that the Democrats actually have a snowball's chance in hell of winning. Congresswoman Schmidt will coast to reelection, unless she is defeated in the GOP primary (and whoever wins the GOP primary will win the general); the 2nd CD is overwhelmingly Republican, and the 2006 election will not have the anemic turnout of this year's special election that made the race uncomfortably close.
Let's not forget, too, that the twit 'Rat Hackett that took her on doesn't even have the cajones to seek a rematch.
You have inflicted an emotional scar of unimaginable proportions upon me.............
you are now removed from my Christmas Card list.
Lamar has some sense. They also wouldn't let the LGBT advocacy group (the name escapes me) put up billboards in south Georgia promoting the gay lifestyle as they had done in Atlanta. The ads consisted of a group of people dressed in occupational garb (ie police, nurses, doctors, etc. NOT Frank N. Furter from the Rocky Horror Picture Show) with a tagline saying that they are in your community providing a positive influence.
I'm sure Lamar knows that several farmers down here know how to operate a cutting torch, or might throw Lamar off their land.
I don't know about that ... my parents are libs and so is my ex. I love all of them to death. I wouldn't call them "evil" or "stupid" ... just intellectually dishonest and lazy ... and maybe even pathetically naive.
Good for this company standing tall.
You're kinder than I am. I went to visit my Uncle in New Mexico, an Air Force vet who served during Vietnam (and, sadly, an ultraleftist). I had to listen to him drop f-bombs all over the place regarding Reagan, Dubya, Rumsfeld and the like. After he was done with his schtick and pontificating on how we've messed up the Middle East, I asked him point blank... "So, what's your solution ?" His answer, "I dunno." I think the "stupid" fits.
Sorry LVM. LOL!! Mental pictures can really do a lot of damage. I know.
I'm sure MSNBC and CNN would give them free time for this crap. Don't let Jean be Newtered for speaking the truth!
Kevin Reilly is head of Lamar Advertising. I believe it was he or his dad who called Louisiana a "banana republic" many years ago!!! Very good conservative family in this state!
seeing the forest through the trees. . .it was not Jean Schmitt calling Rep. Murtha a coward. She was relating that message from a Marine. In effect, the democrats were booing at the Marine.
Obviously a man of great foresight.
Isn't it a rule that you can't whine about something once someone has apologized about it?
It's intellectual laziness. It's easier to criticize than it is to make some mental effort to consider REALITY and possible solutions.
I cut my parents a lot of slack. They're too old and have lived too long to worry about how scary the real world can be. However ... my ex ... she's intelligent and responsible, but still buys the leftist lies ... she has no excuse. She could indeed be "evil". :-)
"An advertising company that gives most of its political donations to Republicans blocked the Democratic National Committee from putting up billboards criticizing GOP Rep. Jean Schmidt of Ohio. "
Good. This isn't a freedom of speech issue. Perhaps they can find a sewage authority which might allow them to paste their canards on stormdrains.
How the Dems can possibly criticize a woman who did nothing more than state the obvious and quote a GENUINE American Hero, is beyond me.
Murtha is a traitor. He is in the same category as Benedict Arnold, excpet Arnold at least had a couple of victories under his belt.
Everytime Vipers and traitors like Pelosi and Murtha talk about pulling out, it encourages the terrorists in Iraq to try to kill more American soldiers.
If they thought we were going to hang tough and stay there as long as needed, they would be less likely to persue their agenda so vigorously.
As in the Viet Nam War, the same traitors are trying to loose in the arena of public opinion, what so many brave American soldiers, living, dead, and mutilated, have achieved on the battlefield with their courage, sacrifice and blood.
"it was not Jean Schmitt calling Rep. Murtha a coward. She was relating that message from a Marine. In effect, the democrats were booing at the Marine."
That's not true. The Marine she quoted, Danny Bubp, stated that he never referred to Murtha by name, and would never call a fellow Marine a coward. She can't even take responsibility for her own statements.
"Shame on the republicans who bashed her after she put Murtha in his place. She said what the so called men of the Republican party didn't have the stones to say."
The grown-ups in the party were putting Murtha in his place by refuting his proposal rather than lobbing Howard Dean-style personal attacks that inevitably backfire. Instead of Murtha looking bad for authoring such a destructive proposal, Schmidt managed to make Murtha look like the victim by attacking a 37 year Marine's courage.
Ridiculous personal attacks backfire, whether they're from the Rabid Left or the Rabid Right. Ask President Kerry how much help he received from Howard Dean, Michael Moore, MoveOn.hitler, and Daily "screw them" Kos.
LOL! Now that is something that makes sense.
Schmidt managed to make a mess by attempting to apologize for telling the truth. The line "Cowards Cut and Run, Marines Never Do" is one for the history books and she should have leaned into the fire and challenged anyone to find the the lie or the slander in that simple statement of fact. Despite, the immediate retreat, the sting of those words made it impossible for all but the most rabid of the Democrats to vote for the resolution.
This is what it truly means when they talk about speaking truth to power. It isn't easy, and often you get beat down for having the courage to do this.
Brinkman is toast in this district if he wastes our money contesting this next primary. I have always liked him, but the matter is settled. He needs to take the good will he has and use it to score another victory for our team, not create a fight that we cannot help but lose no matter what the outcome. Bob McEwen has a significant following in Brown County, but ultimately he just doesn't represent the district anymore, just a Washington based opportunist to us...
You need to choose whether you would rather defeat Schmidt or work to defeat Hackett (and clones) this next cycle, you won't be able to do both. And worse, wasting money and workers in a safe district takes it away from the real fight. Are you going to take resources away from supporting Blackwell by burning them in the 2nd fighting conservative against conservative.. its lame.. Its more important to challenge the Dems in seats like Strickland's. Its important to work out the DeWine question and move past the woes of the Taft administration.
Actually I'd like to see all of that happen - Ken Blackwell for Governor, Paul Hackett defeated no matter what he runs for, and for a conservative to defeat tax-hiker Jean Schmidt in the 2nd CD.
Brinkman and McEwen won't square off against each other again. One will run, one won't, and it looks like it'll be McEwen. I'm not a big McEwen fan, but I'd rather we nominate a conservative who can hold the seat over a tax-hiking RINO who could easily lose it and nearly did the last time around.
Taft proposed a raft of tax hikes on services that would be impossible to roll back, and that is his shame and the reason thinking folks can never forgive him. Jean did the responsible thing, as well as many others in the Ohio Legislature in the situation, put the tax where it can be easily removed when the economy improves. This tax has already been partly rolled back already. Ultimately this is the only way until a better formula is found.
You are just knee jerk upset that folks can and have to act responsibly once in a while and thats just too sad. It would be a whole lot more productive if you used your energy to do something like help change the Ohio Supreme Court composition so that we don't have the court driving education costs up in bizarre ways. Make a positive difference and let go of hating Jean, its just a waste of time.
If she up and does something that helps the other side.. well then her hold on the 2nd will dissappear like the morning dew, but this isn't the case. She is definitely on the side of the angels right now and not one of the squishy RINOs in the house. SO GET OVER IT!
"seeing the forest through the trees. . .it was not Jean Schmitt calling Rep. Murtha a coward. She was relating that message from a Marine. In effect, the democrats were booing at the Marine."
Actually it's part of the public record. Follow along:
-- Jean Schmidt voted to raise Ohio's Sales Tax by 20%. Ken Blackwell opposed it. This vote allowed her to raise Ohio's budget by over 10%. They could have left out the tax increase, and still had more money to spend than they did in the prior budget cycle.
-- Schmidt voted to raise Ohio's Gas Tax by 6 cents/gallon. She and Bob Taft must think gas prices are too low.
-- Schmidt sponsored legislation which led to taxes being raised in Hamilton County and Cincinnati.
That's the Jean Schmidt tax record for you. We cannot condemn liberals like Hillary Clinton for their tax and spend policies, then defend RINO's like Jean Schmidt who do the same thing. These tax hikers in both parties need to be defeated.
This is the worst example of one issue voting. You are welcome to your small mind and your big hate.
Its a fact that this message doesn't resonate in the 2nd. It didn't carry the day in the previous primary and it won't carry the day at any point in the future. GET OVER IT!
One might thinnk they planted the story to get out the message without actually having to pay for the billboard and take the heat for actually putting it up.
Like a Democrat, you along with Bob Taft and Jean Schmidt believe that raising taxes and spending is the answer to everything. Because of Bob Taft's and Jean Schmidt's tax increases, we pay a lot more in gas taxes every time we fill our tanks. Because of Bob Taft's and Jean Schmidt's tax increases, we pay a lot more every time we purchase something that invokes a Sales Tax. Thanks RINO's.
There was nothing responsible about it. If they wanted to be responsible, they would have limited the growth in the spending and been able to balance the budget without raising taxes.
Do you not understand that they could have raised spending by about 4-5% without raising taxes? But that wasn't good enough for them. Instead they raise spending by 10%, and they raise our taxes to pay for it. Just like RINO's.
This is the worst example of one issue voting.
The issue of taxes and spending isn't one single issue. It's what determines the size of government, which is far more than one issue. Just like Bill and Hillary Clinton, Bob Taft and Jean Schmidt believe in a rapid expansion of government, and put the burden of paying for it on our backs. Tax and spend Republicans are just as fiscally destructive as tax and spend Democrats, except to a RINO.
I think Pelosi has had her face lifted so many times that her t1ts now sit on her shoulders.
GET OVER IT!
I'm not going to "get over" any politician's public record. I'm going to learn from it to determine where their values lie.
Bill Clinton, Bob Taft, and Jean Schmidt are committed tax hikers. Anyone who looks at their record can see that. They have proven that raising taxes is their solution to any problem.
Tom Coburn, Steve Chabot, and Ken Blackwell are committed tax cutters. Anyone who looks at their record can see that, too. These are the kind of people that real conservatives should want in office.
The current balanced budget amendment forces the cycle of tax increase and and tax reduction in Ohio. This cycle has good and bad effects. You are all caught up in finding goats and heroes and this just shows a lack of perspective. The question of Conservatism turns on some epic questions that go beyond but do not supersede fiscal responsibility. The other great questions that are being confronted are:
Once again, I'll point out that Ohio could have raised spending by 4-5% without raising taxes. But that's not enough for tax-and-spend liberals like Taft and Schmidt. They had to raise our taxes to pay for their big spending. Those "pennies" add up to taking billions from Ohio's workers, and make our state even less competitive than it already is for attracting jobs.
If you're so concerned about giving power to Democrats, you should join me in condemning the tax increases and corruption of Bob Taft and Jean Schmidt. It is their liberal policies and lack of integrity that threaten to give our state back to the Democrats, and nearly cost us a safe R congressional seat.
The best way to counter that is to nominate different Republicans who think differently from the Taft/Schmidt crowd. Those are the kind of Republicans who could win in 2006. Ohio is going to vote against anything resembling Bob Taft, as we should.
Your numbers for spending that could have been increased is at best a dream of what bottom number is available including all of the non-disgressionary spending.. but see.. I think its pointless to really discuss the numbers because you are more interested in regurgitating someone's gross over-generalization estimated to look good on paper. This tax was raised in a recession and State Revenues were falling not rising. States all across the United States were running 10 & 20 Billion dollar deficits and you conveniently have decided to forget this.
In that you continue to call Jean a Liberal despite the facts, makes me tend to believe that you are actually a bit of a Troll. There is no Taft/Schmidt crowd so this whole line of discussion is meaningless.
You claim to support McEwen, as a true conservative, but he has already lost the district TWICE. He is a Washington lobbyist now, not a citizen from our district. He has zero chance to ever win. Any money wasted on this guy is just that, money wasted from the whole fight to hold and gain ground in the congress. IF WE LOSE THE HOUSE THE DEMOCRATS PLAN TO IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT. They don't need a crime, they don't need evidence. They just need enough votes, thats it. You are a fool of the highest order or a troll.
If Jean had been identified in the list of the Republican Main Street Partnership, I would be on the ramparts with you, but this just isn't the case. Let go of the past, you are making very distorted and unreasonable statements. In that you missed what I was saying about Ohio's perverse budget system tells me you are just coughing up statistics from someone's polemic rather than really understanding anything about this whole question of taxes and spending. You need to re-examine what is important to you. You are concentrating on less than $200 for the average family each year over the period which the tax that upsets you existed, but as it has been half phased out and will be all gone soon, this whole discussion is lame.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.