Posted on 12/04/2005 3:11:02 PM PST by indcons
See--it's already upsetting you :)
well, as with all elitist libs, she "thinks" she's smart.
Katie is about as likeable as a planters wart.
Younger viewers? Does 'Tinkie-Winkie' do news?
You got that right. I have to give Katie credit--she's fairly good doing interviews, from politicians to celebrities. But she would suck if she just sat behind a desk and read the news--that's what they pay Ann Curry for :)
Brent Bozell v. Mary Mapes
Show to air on C-Span today. The entire hour-long show will re-air twice Sunday on C-SPAN2/Book TV. By time zone: EST: 6 and 9pm; CST: 5 and 8pm; MST: 4 and 7pm; PST: 3 and 6pm.
She looks like one of those weird fish that live at the bottom of the sea.
Yeah. That will make everyone think you have a real serious "news organisation" going.
See post 26 on this thread: Brent Bozzell versus Mary Mapes (face off on CSpan today)
If it is possible to sink BELOW zero, SeeBS just discovered how.
When Couric was hired to do the Today Show, ABC's Good Morning America was wining the ratings race.
After Deborah Norvel failed, it was decided that NBC would go after female viewers. The idea was to hire an attractive but quite aggressive female capable of dominateing both her male co-host and male guests. The idea was that a strong female would attract female viewers. It worked and still works to a degree. Katie of couse had taken the role to ideological extremes that has cost audience. Katie has feuded with male co-hosts and won. Men as a rule do not like Katie and her female appeal has declined as she has grown more aggressive and ideologically nasty.
But the dominate female role only works when she has a resisting male to best. A bullying Female is just a (word for female dog). Katie has forgotten how to win nicely. She can no longer attract a large female or male audiences. She is tending to alienate both. The role of interviewer is far different from news Anchor. She is and always was ill suited for an anchor position. Any skilled programmer ought to see that.
The problem with doing an anchor job on an evening news, as a (I will smile while I stab you in the back) female is her lack of trust. Viewers who do not see the world through her eyes will reject her. That is about 65 percent of the possible audience. She is at least as bad as Rather.
An anchor is supposed to tell the truth. To provide the information so that viewers can reach conclusions. That is what a majority of viewers want. Watch me use all the power of CBS to slay someone I don't like, will not garner male viewers. It will not garner female viewers. It will not garner viewers.
I don't understand CBS. They get rid of of one liberally biased news anchor and now, they want to replace him with an even MORE biased liberal. I guess they enjoy being consistently last in the ratings.
Thanks; will check it out. . .
I thought you meant, "wezel."
Wow, that is interesting but since we NEVER watch CBS or NBC we really don't care.
Brent Bozell versus Mary Mapes? Mapes is an absolute incoherent moron. Brent is brilliant and incredibly knowledgable. What the old saying about bringing a knife to a gunfight?
I think being mindless is a requirement.
Wait - has anyone gotten John McCain's thought on this.
The world cannot standby,, we must seek out his thoughts.
Perhaps he will consent to an interview?
I sure hope they get her. I never watch CBS. May this be her black hole.
Well, checking it out. . .but only catching glimpses as I am getting ready to go out. . .but it looks/feels painful. Too bad. . .Mark Levin should have taken her on. . .but then. . .it is Brent's show. . .sooooo. . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.