Skip to comments.
'Gay weddings' become law in UK
BBC.co.uk ^
| December 5, 2005
Posted on 12/04/2005 5:53:54 PM PST by rightwingintelligentsia
Hundreds of gay couples are preparing to form civil partnerships in the coming weeks as the law changes after decades of campaigning. At least 1,200 ceremonies are confirmed as being scheduled already, according to figures from councils compiled by the BBC News website.
Councils are preparing for the first ceremonies, with couples permitted to register from Monday morning.
Campaigners says the law ends inequalities for same-sex couples.
The first ceremonies under the Civil Partnerships Act can take place in Northern Ireland on 19 December, followed by Scotland the next day and England and Wales on 21 December.
Under the law, couples who want to form a partnership must register their intentions with local councils. Unlike marriages, the signing of the legal partnership papers does not need to happen in public.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: civilunions; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; orionblamblam; samesexmarriage; uk
To: rightwingintelligentsia
The sun has finally set on the British Empire.
2
posted on
12/04/2005 5:56:11 PM PST
by
Lucky Dog
To: rightwingintelligentsia
3
posted on
12/04/2005 5:59:15 PM PST
by
EagleUSA
To: Lucky Dog
Looks like they're going the way of the Romans. . .
To: rightwingintelligentsia
From the mouth of Archie Bunker,"England is a fag country." I guess he never knew. I wonder how this is going over with the population.
5
posted on
12/04/2005 6:03:00 PM PST
by
satchmodog9
( Seventy million spent on the lefts Christmas present and all they got was a Scooter)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
"Goin' to the Chapel of Love...."
6
posted on
12/04/2005 6:03:27 PM PST
by
ErnBatavia
(403-3)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Tony Blair has supported this kind of stuff ever since he got into office. Earlier he was behind the initiative to lower the age of consent for gay sex with minors.
7
posted on
12/04/2005 6:08:10 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
There is that dark, Darwinist side of me that says,
let them settle for a fake marriage, and live out their twisted lives without any natural child-rearing or normal family.
Then I must remember that it won't end with gay marriage. Liberals will always push boundaries to new obscene levels and sell their queer ideas, particularly to kids and teenagers, or anyone too soft to stand up against "tolerance".
8
posted on
12/04/2005 6:08:37 PM PST
by
SteveMcKing
("No empire collapses because of technical reasons. They collapse because they are unnatural.")
To: rightwingintelligentsia
The Romans had an excuse... the barbarians were at the gate.
With Britain its...?
9
posted on
12/04/2005 6:10:32 PM PST
by
Lucky Dog
To: rightwingintelligentsia
There is a silver lining here. Use it for statistics for counting gays in the population.
If they say it isn't representative because gays don't get married in large percentages, then we have the situation that most don't really want to live a "normal" middle-class lifestyle, as the activists often claim.
10
posted on
12/04/2005 6:14:58 PM PST
by
AmishDude
(Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
there just aren't enough gays in this world to justify all the bullshiot they are getting away with, something big must be slipping by, but what?
11
posted on
12/04/2005 6:18:06 PM PST
by
sure_fine
(*not one to over kill the thought process*)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Oh no, I hope the heterosexual marriages can survive this!
To: rightwingintelligentsia
13
posted on
12/04/2005 6:30:25 PM PST
by
yldstrk
(My heros have always been cowboys-Reagan and Bush)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
14
posted on
12/04/2005 6:31:19 PM PST
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Exalt the Lord our God, and worship at His footstool; He is holy. Ps 99:5)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Call it whatever you want, 'tisin't a "marriage" in my book.
15
posted on
12/04/2005 6:32:20 PM PST
by
bannie
(The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
To: Cicero
Earlier he was behind the initiative to lower the age of consent for gay sex with minors.Please tell me that one didn't pass.
16
posted on
12/04/2005 6:32:37 PM PST
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Exalt the Lord our God, and worship at His footstool; He is holy. Ps 99:5)
To: AmishDude
That's no silver lining. Besides, gays are made, not born. Their numbers will increase with all this outreach. Why? Because of human depravity and arrogance that ignores the laws of nature and nature's God.
17
posted on
12/04/2005 6:34:18 PM PST
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Exalt the Lord our God, and worship at His footstool; He is holy. Ps 99:5)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Most of those relationships will break down in a year or so. Spain legalized marriage for gays and only 12 couple took advantage of it.
18
posted on
12/04/2005 6:36:32 PM PST
by
Clock King
("How will it end?" - Emperor; "In Fire." - Kosh)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Brucie, get online and books us the cheapest flight to London, baby!
19
posted on
12/04/2005 6:37:06 PM PST
by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: SteveMcKing
Then I must remember that it won't end with gay marriage. Liberals will always push boundaries to new obscene levels and sell their queer ideas, particularly to kids and teenagers, or anyone too soft to stand up against "tolerance".Adult-Child "marriage" is next.
20
posted on
12/04/2005 6:37:49 PM PST
by
Clock King
("How will it end?" - Emperor; "In Fire." - Kosh)
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Yes, I'm afraid the lowering of the homosexual age of consent for minors did pass. The House of Lords tried to block it, which is one reason that Blair has tried to destroy it in its traditional form. It took intense pressure on Blair's part to push it through, but he did it.
I just googled it and found this article:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1045383.stm
21
posted on
12/04/2005 6:49:05 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Clock King
Adult-Child "marriage" is next.My money's on "plural marriages", i.e. polygamy.
22
posted on
12/04/2005 6:49:43 PM PST
by
randog
(What the....?!)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
So what happens when British moslems start complaining? Won't the UK have to backtrack to show how pluralist and tolerant of other cultures they are?
23
posted on
12/04/2005 6:52:11 PM PST
by
Zionist Conspirator
(Liberal Jews and conservative chr*stians should switch religions.)
To: The Worthless Miracle
Do I detect some mocking of those who oppose the fake marriages of gays?
To: Zionist Conspirator
It seems silly for you to write Christ (as in chr*stian) with a * in sort of the same way Jews write G-d for God. Isn't that out of fear and respect? I wouldn't think you would show the same respect for Christ.
25
posted on
12/04/2005 7:00:01 PM PST
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Exalt the Lord our God, and worship at His footstool; He is holy. Ps 99:5)
To: Revolting cat!
Let's see, boys who haven't even finished highschool yet can now do this nasty deed with the full blessings of their government. No one cares about kids anymore.
26
posted on
12/04/2005 7:01:59 PM PST
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Exalt the Lord our God, and worship at His footstool; He is holy. Ps 99:5)
To: The Worthless Miracle
I'm sure normal marriage will survive.
Yet, the combination of all other types of
Unions will probably start creeping out of the woodwork.
Man-Boy, Man-Dead, Woman-Animal, etc etc.
Who are we to prevent the old Europe from this illness.
27
posted on
12/04/2005 7:04:43 PM PST
by
nanomid
To: SteveMcKing
Oh, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) removed bestiality from its list of mental diseases a few years ago, claiming that animals and humans could share long-lasting bonds of love that transcended just sex.
It's just a matter of time.
These perverts and their "tolerant" and "diversity" loving buddies know no ends.
Everytime I hear either of the above two words, I want to vomit.
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
It seems silly for you to write Christ (as in chr*stian) with a * in sort of the same way Jews write G-d for God. Isn't that out of fear and respect? I wouldn't think you would show the same respect for Christ.When I saw that you had pinged me I assumed that you had something to add to my comments on the topic of the thread. Silly me.
29
posted on
12/04/2005 7:20:47 PM PST
by
Zionist Conspirator
(Liberal Jews and conservative chr*stians should switch religions.)
To: CheyennePress
Oh, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) removed bestiality from its list of mental diseases a few years ago, claiming that animals and humans could share long-lasting bonds of love that transcended just sex.Please tell me you are kidding.
30
posted on
12/04/2005 7:22:23 PM PST
by
satchmodog9
( Seventy million spent on the lefts Christmas present and all they got was a Scooter)
To: Lucky Dog
To: satchmodog9
they also tried to remove pedophilia. They put it back in the DSM via addendum after they were caught.
To: Zionist Conspirator
Is it off limits to comment on a tag line?
33
posted on
12/04/2005 8:03:35 PM PST
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Exalt the Lord our God, and worship at His footstool; He is holy. Ps 99:5)
To: Zionist Conspirator
Well, in retrospect...let me apologize for my comment about your tagline. Really it doesn't matter. I didn't mean to be offensive.
34
posted on
12/04/2005 8:20:19 PM PST
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Exalt the Lord our God, and worship at His footstool; He is holy. Ps 99:5)
To: ErnBatavia
Ewww... my eyes! That is an ugly picture. That creature in pink looks like Richard Simmons.
35
posted on
12/04/2005 8:41:37 PM PST
by
Wilhelm Tell
(True or False? This is not a tag line.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
36
posted on
12/04/2005 9:21:51 PM PST
by
Freedom_Fighter_2001
(When money is no object - it's your money they're talking about)
To: DirtyHarryY2K; little jeremiah
Homosexual Agenda ping.
Ouch. Not looking good for Great Britain. Imagine if the Queen becomes a Queer. Britain's first homosexual royalty!
*gags*
37
posted on
12/04/2005 10:04:26 PM PST
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(We DARE Defend Our Rights [Alabama State Motto])
To: rightwingintelligentsia
------Does anyone see anything missing here? THE BRIDE.
38
posted on
12/04/2005 10:48:18 PM PST
by
WasDougsLamb
(I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed man.)
To: SouthernFreebird
No, I don't mock those people at all. I just think on this particular issue, the arguments most people opposed to gay "marriage" are weak. I agree that it wouldn't be a marriage. It would be like calling a car a boat, marriage is by definition between a man and a woman.
However, seeing as government has chosen to become involved extensively in marriages, (through taxes, licenses, etc) and government has tried to get people to do what it thinks is good (get married have a family, etc), instead of staying out of people's lives - It's inevitable that other groups will want the same benefits - whether it's through marriage, unions, etc. Again, government should not be involved in marriage...
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Is it off limits to comment on a tag line?My apologies to you. I didn't realize you were commenting on my tag line.
I'm just so tired of repeating the "*" explanation over and over and over to new people who haven't heard it before. I guess I need to post an overall explanation at the "personal" section of the forum and refer all questioners to it from then on.
40
posted on
12/05/2005 7:35:51 AM PST
by
Zionist Conspirator
(Liberal Jews and conservative chr*stians should switch religions.)
To: randog
My money's on "plural marriages", i.e. polygamy.Someone in Sweden(?), with a lot of money, is already sueing for that. One man with two women.
41
posted on
12/05/2005 7:38:46 AM PST
by
Clock King
("How will it end?" - Emperor; "In Fire." - Kosh)
To: Cicero
C'Mon. now, everyone knows the biggest threat to England is the smokers in the population. That's why Blair got 'em banned from public sight. Priorities, y' know. /sarc/
42
posted on
12/07/2005 4:10:15 AM PST
by
The Foolkiller
( Why......That sounds.....FOOLish!)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson