Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Condi Rice's new nickname - Whitehouse insiders say GWB now referring to Condi as '44'
Rice 2008 ^ | December 2005

Posted on 12/05/2005 3:21:31 AM PST by ajolympian2004

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-213 next last
To: don-o
Others (me) will never vote for a pro-abortion candidate. Never.

Did you vote for George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004? He supports the three exceptions the same as Rice does.

121 posted on 12/05/2005 11:16:31 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DaGman
With gasoline prices out of sight, how do you sell a candidate that once had an Exxon tanker named after her?

Gas is $1.96 here in North Texas. That's "out of sight"?

122 posted on 12/05/2005 11:19:48 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
I will not support her in any way if she is "mildly pro choice."

Did you support George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004? He's on record as being also "mildly pro-life" in that he supports the three exceptions.

123 posted on 12/05/2005 11:21:08 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Should this be a race to the bottom? If these candidates were inadequate, should they be cited to justify another?

Why should I overlook Rice's patent negatives? Because others with negatives also failed? Or because she is Black? Or female?

Find me a Black female with charisma who is right on the issues and I will lead the charge.


124 posted on 12/05/2005 11:22:27 PM PST by nathanbedford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

So who will you support then? We will have a choice only from among the RINOs with McCain leading the pack. Will you sit it out and see a liberal Democrat take over instead?


125 posted on 12/05/2005 11:25:10 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
At the time Nathan Bedford Forrest participated in founding the Ku Klux Klan, the nation had been torn by civil war, the slaves had been emancipated and there was a tremendous need to bring the nation back together. Forrest and his cohorts chose to do the opposite. They actively set out to murder and terrorize black people and anyone who would aid them. They also actively chose to foster and continue a despicable culture of racism and oppression for generations after the Civil War.

Your attempt to equate the opinions of other historical figures with the heinous acts of Forrest in order to justify your admiration of him speaks volumes about who you are as a person.

Had you acknowledged Bedford's participation in founding the Klan without attempting to justify it with a hollow "well, they did it too" defense, I would have been more open to what you might say about any positive aspects of his life.

126 posted on 12/06/2005 8:08:50 AM PST by Wolfstar ("In war, there are usually only two exit strategies: victory or defeat." Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
Jefferson never manumitted his slaves (apart from mistress and his children)

There is no evidence that Jefferson had a black slave Mistress and children with said Mistress. The best any of the leftists could do in trying to smear a founding father is prove that said Mistress bore one child from a male of the Jefferson line of which there were many. Repeating leftist propaganda doesn't win many points with me.

Why should I overlook Rice's patent negatives? Because others with negatives also failed? Or because she is Black? Or female?

Which negatives would you be referring too? The Anti-Israel smear? She's the Secretary of State and is forwarding the platform of the Administration as is her job. Pro-Arab? Same deal. That she said she is somewhat pro-choice? That doesn't hurt her electability in the least.
127 posted on 12/07/2005 4:23:00 AM PST by Durus ("Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Durus
Oh, please, stop.


128 posted on 12/07/2005 5:51:04 AM PST by nathanbedford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
What a devastating response.

Consider my comments to you stopped.
129 posted on 12/07/2005 6:03:47 AM PST by Durus ("Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

Cheney/Rice


130 posted on 12/07/2005 6:06:08 AM PST by freedomlover (This Fall a Woman will be the Mother of a Mouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Durus
There is no evidence

There is no evidence? There is no evidence? There is no evidence!

Note to all sentiment humanoids: Please suspend all rational belief systems while we abolish the science of DNA.


131 posted on 12/07/2005 6:52:38 AM PST by nathanbedford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
Cronyism approaching the style as it was practiced to a mandarin art in the Kremlin.

Interesting comment.

Cronyism is really nothing new and is quite common for politicians. Let's just call it returning a favor.

Political appointments, fat government contracts, "earmarked" pork spending, fund raising assistance, etc.

It might cause some people to wonder what in the world Miss Rice has done to be owed so much?

On the other hand, maybe she's just a really good friend of the administration.

Who knows?

132 posted on 12/07/2005 7:18:05 AM PST by WhiteGuy (Vote for gridlock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
The science of DNA only proved that one (and only one) child was fathered by someone from the Jefferson family. DNA did not prove it was Jefferson himself and did prove that the other children (or is it child) were not fathered by any Jefferson.

The science of DNA shows the odds of that one child being Toms is 1 in 6 or approximately 17%. So yes I will stand by the statement of "there is no evidence" and so will any other person sufficiently versed in DNA evidence and are familiar with the case at hand.
133 posted on 12/07/2005 7:22:36 AM PST by Durus ("Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004
Considering the fact that this is from "Rice 2008" and it from "unnamed sources", I'd take it with a grain of salt.

I suspect, that if the President has called her this, it is probably a personal joke between them and doesn't mean anything.

134 posted on 12/07/2005 7:24:33 AM PST by COEXERJ145 (Those Who Want to Impeach President Bush Are the Party of Treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TravisBickle

Actually they would make a nice couple.


135 posted on 12/07/2005 7:24:55 AM PST by angcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

Comment #136 Removed by Moderator

To: truthandlife

Bush 41 used to be pro-choice until he ran for President. If Condi becomes pro-life, she can probably walk to the nomination.


137 posted on 12/07/2005 2:03:09 PM PST by votelife (we need 60 conservative senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

Comment #138 Removed by Moderator

Comment #139 Removed by Moderator

Comment #140 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-213 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson