"I know...abiogenesis is not the same as evolution (However, a link provided on this thread to Scientific American's website calls abiogenesis chemical evolution...so don't we just go from one kind of evolution that allegedly explains the origin of life and another that allegedly explains speciation on a grand scale...Are not biological and chemical evolution linked?)"
" The point was that museums pass of abiogenesis speculation as scientific theory relating to the origin of all life."
"I understand the evidence provided for human evolution from a common primate ancestor...Do we have actual evidence that it is the clean line of the monkey walking into an ape walking into a human that is displayed? (no.)"
Define *clean line*.
posted on 12/05/2005 3:50:42 PM PST
("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
Is abiogenesis chemical evolution as Scientific American states?
Where is the evidence that a cell climbed out of a primordial ooze some million/billion years ago?
"Define *clean line*."
Clean line is defined in the museum displays as they show a monkey walking into an ape walking into a human (with time-line)...A clean, straight line succession. Is there evidence for this or just a common ancestor between these?
posted on 12/05/2005 4:06:00 PM PST
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson