Skip to comments.
Supreme Court Appears Sympathetic To Campus Recruiting
Kansas City Channel ^
| December 6, 2005
| None Listed
Posted on 12/06/2005 8:23:41 PM PST by MissouriConservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: MissouriConservative
I say that if they are truly principled, they will turn down the federal money. If they don't, they are lying through their liberal money grubbing teeth. Let them put their (government) money where their mouth is.
2
posted on
12/06/2005 8:24:41 PM PST
by
MissouriConservative
(I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code)
To: MissouriConservative
On CSPAN right now. Scalia is awesome. John Roberts is going to be outstanding.
3
posted on
12/06/2005 8:28:07 PM PST
by
neodad
(My ex-wife is stuck on stupid.)
To: MissouriConservative
Exactly.
They have to decide what is more important: their gooberment subsidies, or their loyalty to butt-bandits. The irony is delicious.
4
posted on
12/06/2005 8:28:48 PM PST
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: MissouriConservative
Only law professors can be so screwed up as to think that their first amendment rights are being violated just because Uncle Sugar puts some strings on his cash.
The Law Schools can bitch about it all day long, no one is messing with their First Amendment rights.
The Professors' argument is so convoluted and nonsensical, it is amazing that any lower court every upheld their argument.
To: neodad
"John Roberts is going to be outstanding."
I like it when he said that all they had to do was turn down federal money. Why do law professors have to make things so complicated? Or could there be a hidden agenda? (I already know the answer too....lol)
6
posted on
12/06/2005 8:37:17 PM PST
by
MissouriConservative
(I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code)
To: MissouriConservative
It is clear these colleges do have viable alternatives to raise the money required. I don't know about you but I find it interesting that 35 Billion dollars goes to fund colleges and the cost of tuition is still skyrocketing. It seems they are operating under the college entitlement system. Hobson has long been turned out on his ear and his ponies have been worked to the bone.
7
posted on
12/06/2005 8:37:48 PM PST
by
Ma3lst0rm
(Praying for thy enemy is not giving them refuge and forum.)
To: clee1
Maybe they can turn to their homosexual donors to make up the money lost from the government? Let them all put their money up and stand up for what they believe in.
8
posted on
12/06/2005 8:38:22 PM PST
by
MissouriConservative
(I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code)
To: Ninian Dryhope
The Supreme Court will set them all straight, no pun entended.
9
posted on
12/06/2005 8:40:27 PM PST
by
MissouriConservative
(I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code)
To: MissouriConservative
Rebekah Phelps-RoperIs she related to Fred?
10
posted on
12/06/2005 8:40:40 PM PST
by
Prov3456
To: MissouriConservative
The trouble with THAT idea is that the liberal fag mafia wants to make all of US pay for the spread of their perverted lifestyles.
They don't want to have to personally support their agenda - they want to use the police power of gooberment to do it for them.
11
posted on
12/06/2005 8:41:47 PM PST
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: Ma3lst0rm
I just want colleges to come clean on where the money is going. It's getting so that most people can't afford college even though thousands of our tax dollars are going into them like a bottomless pit.
12
posted on
12/06/2005 8:43:02 PM PST
by
MissouriConservative
(I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code)
To: Prov3456
I was thinking Mr. Roper....lol
13
posted on
12/06/2005 8:43:34 PM PST
by
MissouriConservative
(I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code)
To: clee1
what is more important: their gooberment subsidies, or their loyalty to butt-bandits. You know who wins that one.
Money talks, butt-bandits walk (lightly in the loafers.)
14
posted on
12/06/2005 8:47:29 PM PST
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: MissouriConservative
I was surprised not to hear or read anything about what I think is an equivalent dilemma: a lawsuit settlement that requires the parties not to reveal the settlement itself. Isn't that the same idea? You have to relinquish your Free Speech Rights to get the cash, and that's by order of the court. Isn't that the same principle in this FAIR case?
15
posted on
12/06/2005 8:52:01 PM PST
by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: MissouriConservative
Supreme Court Appears Sympathetic To Campus RecruitingVery unlikely that this can be construed as even an inkling of a change in the Supremies voracious taste for political activism and legislating from the bench!
16
posted on
12/06/2005 8:54:03 PM PST
by
VOYAGER
(M<)
To: MissouriConservative
New Chief Justice John Roberts said schools unhappy with the "don't ask, don't tell" policy have a simple solution: turn down federal cash. This line brought a smile to my face because it really is THAT simple. I think I might be in love with Chief Justice Roberts! (ha!)
17
posted on
12/06/2005 8:57:09 PM PST
by
blinachka
(Vechnaya Pamyat Daddy... xoxo)
To: MissouriConservative
Not even close. 6-3 or better to uphold the Solomon Amendment. Why do I say that?
Because Breyer asked the best question in the oral arguments to the FAIR attorney, to wit, "Why isn't more speech better than less speech?"(paraphrased).
Ballgame over.
Roberts was very succinct. You don't want the military then don't take the money. Cites precedent of Dole.
18
posted on
12/06/2005 9:02:53 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: Torie
19
posted on
12/06/2005 9:04:42 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: jwalsh07
Yup. But then this one was roadkill from the beginning. SCOTUS favors the war on terror.
20
posted on
12/06/2005 9:08:34 PM PST
by
Torie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson