Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Appears Sympathetic To Campus Recruiting
Kansas City Channel ^ | December 6, 2005 | None Listed

Posted on 12/06/2005 8:23:41 PM PST by MissouriConservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 12/06/2005 8:23:42 PM PST by MissouriConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

I say that if they are truly principled, they will turn down the federal money. If they don't, they are lying through their liberal money grubbing teeth. Let them put their (government) money where their mouth is.


2 posted on 12/06/2005 8:24:41 PM PST by MissouriConservative (I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

On CSPAN right now. Scalia is awesome. John Roberts is going to be outstanding.


3 posted on 12/06/2005 8:28:07 PM PST by neodad (My ex-wife is stuck on stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

Exactly.

They have to decide what is more important: their gooberment subsidies, or their loyalty to butt-bandits. The irony is delicious.


4 posted on 12/06/2005 8:28:48 PM PST by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative
Only law professors can be so screwed up as to think that their first amendment rights are being violated just because Uncle Sugar puts some strings on his cash.

The Law Schools can bitch about it all day long, no one is messing with their First Amendment rights.

The Professors' argument is so convoluted and nonsensical, it is amazing that any lower court every upheld their argument.
5 posted on 12/06/2005 8:30:02 PM PST by Ninian Dryhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neodad

"John Roberts is going to be outstanding."

I like it when he said that all they had to do was turn down federal money. Why do law professors have to make things so complicated? Or could there be a hidden agenda? (I already know the answer too....lol)


6 posted on 12/06/2005 8:37:17 PM PST by MissouriConservative (I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

It is clear these colleges do have viable alternatives to raise the money required. I don't know about you but I find it interesting that 35 Billion dollars goes to fund colleges and the cost of tuition is still skyrocketing. It seems they are operating under the college entitlement system. Hobson has long been turned out on his ear and his ponies have been worked to the bone.


7 posted on 12/06/2005 8:37:48 PM PST by Ma3lst0rm (Praying for thy enemy is not giving them refuge and forum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clee1

Maybe they can turn to their homosexual donors to make up the money lost from the government? Let them all put their money up and stand up for what they believe in.


8 posted on 12/06/2005 8:38:22 PM PST by MissouriConservative (I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ninian Dryhope

The Supreme Court will set them all straight, no pun entended.


9 posted on 12/06/2005 8:40:27 PM PST by MissouriConservative (I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative
Rebekah Phelps-Roper

Is she related to Fred?

10 posted on 12/06/2005 8:40:40 PM PST by Prov3456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

The trouble with THAT idea is that the liberal fag mafia wants to make all of US pay for the spread of their perverted lifestyles.

They don't want to have to personally support their agenda - they want to use the police power of gooberment to do it for them.


11 posted on 12/06/2005 8:41:47 PM PST by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ma3lst0rm

I just want colleges to come clean on where the money is going. It's getting so that most people can't afford college even though thousands of our tax dollars are going into them like a bottomless pit.


12 posted on 12/06/2005 8:43:02 PM PST by MissouriConservative (I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Prov3456

I was thinking Mr. Roper....lol


13 posted on 12/06/2005 8:43:34 PM PST by MissouriConservative (I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: clee1
what is more important: their gooberment subsidies, or their loyalty to butt-bandits.

You know who wins that one.

Money talks, butt-bandits walk (lightly in the loafers.)

14 posted on 12/06/2005 8:47:29 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

I was surprised not to hear or read anything about what I think is an equivalent dilemma: a lawsuit settlement that requires the parties not to reveal the settlement itself. Isn't that the same idea? You have to relinquish your Free Speech Rights to get the cash, and that's by order of the court. Isn't that the same principle in this FAIR case?


15 posted on 12/06/2005 8:52:01 PM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative
Supreme Court Appears Sympathetic To Campus Recruiting

Very unlikely that this can be construed as even an inkling of a change in the Supremies voracious taste for political activism and legislating from the bench!

16 posted on 12/06/2005 8:54:03 PM PST by VOYAGER (M<)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative
New Chief Justice John Roberts said schools unhappy with the "don't ask, don't tell" policy have a simple solution: turn down federal cash.

This line brought a smile to my face because it really is THAT simple. I think I might be in love with Chief Justice Roberts! (ha!)

17 posted on 12/06/2005 8:57:09 PM PST by blinachka (Vechnaya Pamyat Daddy... xoxo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative
Not even close. 6-3 or better to uphold the Solomon Amendment. Why do I say that?

Because Breyer asked the best question in the oral arguments to the FAIR attorney, to wit, "Why isn't more speech better than less speech?"(paraphrased).

Ballgame over.

Roberts was very succinct. You don't want the military then don't take the money. Cites precedent of Dole.

18 posted on 12/06/2005 9:02:53 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie

See 18.


19 posted on 12/06/2005 9:04:42 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Yup. But then this one was roadkill from the beginning. SCOTUS favors the war on terror.


20 posted on 12/06/2005 9:08:34 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson