Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aquinasfan
Can you give me an example of a case where "pragmatic nominalism" would serve a useful purpose?

To my mind, the use of theoretical models "widely agreed upon by experts" is nominalistic because of the reliance upon "wide agreement" and the acknowledgment that the model doesn't match reality. Of course the incongruence between model and reality can be worked into the Thomistic/realist principle of analogy, but I think it might be an awkward fit.

Or perhaps I've forgotten what nominalism is. I haven't touched the nominalists in years.

38 posted on 12/09/2005 7:49:54 AM PST by Dumb_Ox (Hoc ad delectationem stultorum scriptus est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Dumb_Ox
To my mind, the use of theoretical models "widely agreed upon by experts" is nominalistic because of the reliance upon "wide agreement" and the acknowledgment that the model doesn't match reality.

That makes sense, but I don't think that this method would serve any useful purpose with regard to creatures, unless there existed a myriad of fossils displaying a continuum of (minute) morphological change, which is clearly not the case.

41 posted on 12/09/2005 8:27:17 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson