Posted on 12/09/2005 7:48:27 PM PST by crazyhorse691
Oh my God....another ISM.
I'm glad they got busted! People like that don't deserve to be free.
If you want to imagine the potential of these scumbags if they ever get serious financing (and honestly, how many rich enemies does the US have?), read Michael Crichton's book State of Fear. I wouldn't be surprised if they're already being enlisted Al Queda...I understand Bin Laden is a big greenie...
HAYDUKE LIVES!
Additional details on some of the arrests in Arizona;
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1537568/posts
hey- what's your word on this- wwfb?
Teenagers. Literally teens and 20-somethings from the 1990s who never left that decade.
They're still laying in bed, alternately crying to Pearl Jam albums and "rocking out" to Nirvana.
I say charge them with conspiracy as well. And it might be a good thing to toss in some good ol' fashioned Patriot Act on their idiot butts.
If Ma and Pa had have applied some belt to their behinds, they wouldn't be acting this way now.
"If we can't save the trees, we'll BURN 'em down!"
Cool! Did the cops find any blue-ringed octopi on the suspects?
I get a real laugh out of the idea that they are all grouped in dispersed cells that don't communicate with each other and don't mutually plan. It looks like these folks did a lot of planning. If they are convicted and given some really hard time a few might even be willing to talk to the authorities and tell them what's really happening and rat out the rest of the consiprators.
Sarah Harvey
William Rodgers
Kevin Tubbs
Credit for the mug shots here: Answers sought in UW arson (Seattle Times)
"These are serious crimes. Frankly, they're just criminals and they need to be treated as such."
Since these attacks were coordinated around the country it was right for them to be hunted down by the FBI.
Whether or not they should be considered terrorists is another question.
They are not doing things to create terror, they are doing things to stop what they consider to be environment-harming activities.
Terrorists blow up random targets killing some and terrorizing countless others who ask "But for the grace of God..."
These were targeted criminal attacks.
I am concerned when a law is created to fight crime X and then is later used to fight crime Y.
For example, the RICO act which is used against abortion protestors.
Organized criminal enterprise is prosecuted under RICO- no matter who is doing the perpetrating. Regardless, you care more for animals & Gaia, than humans- correct? Or is your stance, that humans are no better than animals and Gaia is the higher being?
But I am also opposed to the creeping police state.
RICO is bad law.
If the police and FBI can't find each person who commits a crime guilty of that crime, then they need to get new jobs.
Finding people guilty of working together with others to commit crimes is anti-constitutional. The fact that people get together is perfectly legit. What they do after they make plans or what they specifically plan to do is what should be prosecuted.
If five people get together and decide to torch a lumber yard, then each of them should be found guilty of either torching a lumber yard or planning to torch a lumber yard. They should not also be found guilty of associating with others to torch a lumber yard.
Your sensitive understanding is truly wonderful. All the best to ya...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.