Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christians keep Hollywood profitable.
National Catholic Register ^ | 10 December 2005 | the Editors, National Catholic Register

Posted on 12/10/2005 4:37:25 AM PST by Aussie Dasher

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-57 last
To: IronJack
Surely there's got to be some other region in the country where a film industry could get off the ground and shed the decadent baggage of the California fairyland. It's become a tautology: you want to get into film, you have to go to Hollywood. Why? Because that's where all the film people are. Surely conservatives have demonstrated they have the clout to support an alternative.

I wish Mel Gibson would use his millions to build a film studio near Branson. Right in the heartland, where the conservative alternative to smutty Vegas live acts are already flourishing.

51 posted on 12/10/2005 9:58:25 AM PST by Albion Wilde ((America will not run, and we will not forget our responsibilities. George W. Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

She might be right: I am an atheist and I haven't been to a movie theater for 25+ years. And I do not rent their crap on video, either, and [on purpose] do not have a TV. So if I am in any way indicative, it would be the believers' money that keeps the Hollywood types on the hog.


52 posted on 12/10/2005 10:04:15 AM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Christians keep Hollywood profitable.

Many Christians pretty much have the 'entertain me' jones...like everyone else...unfortunately.

53 posted on 12/10/2005 10:15:01 AM PST by joesnuffy (A camel once bit my sister-we knew just what to do- gather large rocks & squash her-Mullet Ho'mar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde
I wish Mel Gibson would use his millions to build a film studio near Branson.

I'm sure the State of Missouri would do back-flips to accommodate such a venture.

54 posted on 12/10/2005 10:35:53 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

The was an attempt to start a movie studio in Utah. It failed miserably.

Movie people are knowledge workers. Knowledge workers move from job to job in the same industry. The is why knowledge firms tend to concentrate. If you want a career in financial services you have to live in and around the New York metro area. You know that if you want to find a better job in another bank or brokerage house you don't have to relocate. And banks and brokerage houses know they have a large skill base to draw on. If you want to work in cutting edge computer design you have to live in a Silicon Valley area. If you want to work in fashion you have to go to New York or Paris or LA.

You could save a ton of money by moving a knowledge firm to the boondocks, but where would you find your employees ? And if your employees would be stuck there because you are their only possible employer. If you want to make the connections that will get your career off the ground and keep you working steadily you have to be where the movers and shakers are.

No. The film industry has to stay where the agents and producers and film crews and casting directors and writers are concentrated.


55 posted on 12/10/2005 10:55:29 AM PST by Sam the Sham (A conservative party tough on illegal immigration could carry California in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Sam the Sham
where would you find your employees ?

Anywhere? If you wanted to get into the stale Hollywood film community, then you'd stay in Hollywood. But if you wanted to be able to express yourself and do real creative work without some studio head guiding your hand, you'd go where independent thought flourished.

And if your employees would be stuck there because you are their only possible employer.

Only if nobody follows suit and locates where you did. That wasn't true in Hollywood, why would it be true somewhere new?

If you want to make the connections that will get your career off the ground and keep you working steadily you have to be where the movers and shakers are.

And why does that have to be in Hollywood? Those "movers and shakers" have proven repeatedly that they suck.

There's no need to continue this tautology. Hollywood is not sacred ground. Its product could come from any pipe in any reasonably sized cesspool. And good movies can come from Cottonwood as easily as Hollywood -- more easily in fact, since a new movie community has no shameful legacy to carry forward.

56 posted on 12/10/2005 11:08:20 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

You have missed it completely.

Motion pictures and architecture are artistic mediums where....
1. The artist cannot afford the price of his output. No writer can afford to finance a professional film out of his own pocket so the money men have to get involved. And then again the film must be distributed and marketed so thinking you can just go off to Branson and make a movie without a "studio head" makes no sense. Mel Gibson had to have Fox distribute TPOTC.
2. The efforts of many highly skilled professionals are necessary. You need sound and light and editing and .... These people will stay where they can find regular work where the motion picture industry is concentrated. They cannot just work once or twice a year. So they are not going to go off to Branson.
3. The projects you get and the fan base you build depends on the hit projects you are in. It is in the interest of the best stars to work in the best projects and the best projects to improve their chances of success by having the best stars. A few flops and its dinner theater and Hollywood Squares. It's the difference between having clout (i.e., the money men will give you whatever you want) and being a washed up joke. The ingenue starlet has until 28 to become a star. And there are lots of pretty girls. So going off to the boondocks would be career suicide.


57 posted on 12/10/2005 11:35:24 AM PST by Sam the Sham (A conservative party tough on illegal immigration could carry California in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson