Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IS DICK MORRIS AN IDIOT? OR IS HE STILL ON THE CLINTON PAYROLL?
The Hill, NY Daily News | 12.12.05 | Mia T

Posted on 12/12/2005 5:06:57 AM PST by Mia T

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: railsplitter

The throne, not the bully pulpit. Haven't you noticed? Missus clinton doesn't talk. ;)

She is maintained daily by all manner of device, including, but not limited to: the zipper-hoist, the throne, the complex question and other sleights of hand... and, of course, the jackboot.


61 posted on 12/12/2005 9:04:58 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: jla

bump


62 posted on 12/12/2005 9:08:43 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: purpleland

Why? And assure they nominate Mark Warner? No thanks!

Don't get me wrong, I'd vote against her, and I hope she loses. But I still think other people that are likely to get the nomination if she doesn't are more dangerous then she is.


63 posted on 12/12/2005 9:14:11 AM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

IS DICK MORRIS AN IDIOT? ---
****

Yes. Ever since the toe sucking has seemed to end in his, poll-taking, bloated life, he's losing it.

*Foremost, Dick Morris is an opportunistic hack. It's his means of survival. However, Morris contrasts quite precisely the personalities and political wills of Hillary and Bill Clinton. Clearly, Morris warns us that Hillary, not Bill, is more ruthless, and to beware of her. I believe Morris' publicized promotion of Condi Rice for president is more to prey upon Hillary's paranoia. Paranoia is rhizomatic underlay of megalomania. Hillary's lack of real accomplishments and void of intellectual stability makes Hillary seem yet paler and shallower when compared to Condi.


64 posted on 12/12/2005 9:30:13 AM PST by purpleland (Vigilance and Valor! Socialism is the Opiate of Academia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
IS DICK MORRIS AN IDIOT? OR IS HE STILL ON THE CLINTON PAYROLL?

Yes.

Yes.

But enough about what I'd say to you in a darkened room.

65 posted on 12/12/2005 9:32:08 AM PST by Lazamataz (Liberals screwed again: HOLIDAY derives from the words Holy Day. NOW what will they do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

"The cash would have flowed into her coffers had she gone after this deeply flawed candidate FOR REAL."

I agree. There would be a great deal of funding (maybe from some Democrats too) to support Pirros's two-fisted fight and it would diminish Hillary. Hillary really needs to be deflated and defeated. Hillary is not the "smartest" woman politico: Hillary is the most ruthless one.


66 posted on 12/12/2005 9:38:13 AM PST by purpleland (Vigilance and Valor! Socialism is the Opiate of Academia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Although there are lots of examples to pick from, my favorite Little Dick Morris the political moron stories was from October when Little Dick was commenting on a poll in the Bloomberg/Ferrer mayorial race in NYC. Little Dick looked at the numbers, Bloomberg 52/38 and saw that Bloomberg was definitely in trouble. See, in Little Dicks mind, the undecideds still always vote against the incumbent. Little Dick actually said that the numbers did not reflect that Hispanics would NEVER fail to vote for Fererr. The large number of "undecideds" were of course not "undecided" at all, but just Democrats ( the whole town is 6 to 1 Democrat)that were EMBARRASSED to tell a pollster they were not voting for the Democrat. Bloomberg won by 20 points, the largest margin of victory for a Republican in NYC history. Funny Sean Hannity never brought his stupid "prediction" to Little Dick, but then again he never does.
67 posted on 12/12/2005 9:39:22 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (We will never murtha to the terrorists. Bring home the troops means bring home the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: purpleland
Hillary's lack of real accomplishments and void of intellectual stability makes Hillary seem yet paler and shallower when compared to Condi. --- no kidding.

Let's die before the old media says the same!

68 posted on 12/12/2005 10:34:17 AM PST by beyond the sea (Murtha: Redeployment - What .......Surrender? // “Victory is not a strategy”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: railsplitter

thanks :)
RE: your #9~ It's the classic approach-avoidance conflict. (desire to win vs. fear that clinton machine will kill her political career)

The irony, of course, is that by yielding to the clinton machine, her political career really will be over.


69 posted on 12/12/2005 11:48:15 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Should you decide the roman à clef is not your cup of tea, you definitely have a future writing for Groucho. ;)


70 posted on 12/12/2005 12:01:13 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: zbigreddogz

More dangerous for the country, or simply more dangerous for the GOP?


71 posted on 12/12/2005 12:05:33 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: purpleland

It kills me to think of wonderful Pirro having to run against the likes of this monster Hillary.

How the heck did we end up like this ?

Pirro is such a hard worker. You'd be proud to have her doing good in any of your localities. God Bless Her.


72 posted on 12/12/2005 12:06:39 PM PST by citizensgratitude (Our Military, present & past, the Highest example of Brotherhood of Man and doing God's Will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

Jusqu au dessus!


73 posted on 12/12/2005 12:06:48 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: purpleland; beyond the sea
Hillary's lack of real accomplishments and void of intellectual stability... --purpleland

 

It is no accident--and the Sheehy hagiography notwithstanding, it is certainly not because of any patriarchal society--that this reflexive kleptocrat never sought office. She never ran simply because she is a perfectionist and an incompetent who cannot tolerate personal (as opposed to bill-related) criticism, witness the prescreened, heavily controlled, sycophantic crowds, her pre-programmed, totally scripted appearances (or, alternatively, her totally mute "listening tour"), her unavailability to the press, indeed, her "bluebird."

Mia T, 8.16.05
HILLARY IN AVIARY


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
ARTICLE
 

Clinton Administration Veteran:
"Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life."


My two cents' worth--and I think it is the two cents' worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton Administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994--is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life. Heading up health-care reform was the only major administrative job she has ever tried to do. And she was a complete flop at it. She had neither the grasp of policy substance, the managerial skills, nor the political smarts to do the job she was then given. And she wasn't smart enough to realize that she was in over her head and had to get out of the Health Care Czar role quickly.... there is no reason to think that she would be anything but an abysmal president.

J. Bradford DeLong
professor of economics, Berkeley
clinton Administration veteran


The clintons, as is their wont, are now taking this proxy scheme to even more outrageous extremes. The latest: an actual hillary clinton proxy presidency, populated on both sides of the camera by assorted rodham and clinton ex-staffers, sycophants and should-be felons, witness the latest hire.

'Commander-in-Chief,' a show that sets out to crown a 'queen,' instead exposes the kitschy simplemindedness of Hollywood fantasy and the special sway and shortsightedness of the pathologic ego.

Mia T, 10.27.05
THE DANGER OF RUNNING VICARIOUSLY
Bill O'Reilly chews up and spits out the hillary clinton candidacy
(clip included)



Having failed to snare the Nobel Peace Prize by ignoring terrorism, clinton has apparently decided to intensify his America-bashing on foreign soil, the method employed by Jimmy Carter to great (if somewhat belated) effect.

(The Nobel committee, sufficiently mollified only after 24 years of the peanut president's America-bashing, awarded Carter his 1978 Peace Prize finally in 2002.)

Meanwhile, back in the Senate, the missus, the other half of the clinton construct, maintains her hawkish pose (though not without bird problems of another sort).

Yet another example of the clinton conflation ploy, (see SCHEMA PINOCCHIO: how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor), this variant allows "clinton, the construct" to hold two mutually exclusive positions simultaneously, thereby enabling the missus to avoid in '08 the trap that repeatedly ensnared the ever 'nuanced' Kerry in '04.

Do you now understand how stupid the clintons think you are?

A CALL TO IMPEACH CLINTON IN ABSENTIA
Mia T, 11.17.05

REINVENTING HILLARY... AGAIN
(clinton machine dumps Geena Davis for Margaret Thatcher)
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor2
Mia T, 11.23.05



It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

G. K. Chesterton


Reviews of "Commander-in-Chief" mislead; they suggest that this new ABC offering, this electuary of suds and psychologizing, is optional for missus clinton, that Rod Lurie's latest clinton agitprop is nothing more than the icing on missus clinton's inaugural cake.

The reviews miss the point of the show, (i.e., the show is not optional but necessary (though hardly sufficient) if clinton is to prevail), because the reviews fail to identify missus clinton's problem in the first place. And circular reasoning compounds the error.


THE PROBLEM

While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy on the battlefield isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous, troglodyte mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary, forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
COMPLETE ARTICLE
see descriptor morphs

Mia T, 11.23.05
REINVENTING HILLARY... AGAIN
(clinton machine dumps Geena Davis for Margaret Thatcher)
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor2





COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005 

74 posted on 12/12/2005 12:26:11 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: purpleland
... Hillary's paranoia. Paranoia is rhizomatic underlay of megalomania. --purpleland



 

the MAD hillary series
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS
FOR THE CHILDREN,
FOR AMERICA,
FOR THE WORLD


MAD hillary series #1
ALFRED E."What, me worry?" CLINTON
+ CRAZY HIL MAD COVER STORY



THE THREAT OF TERRORISM AS CLOSE AS
A CLINTON TO OVAL OFFICE
MAD hillary series #2
HILLARY'S
MIDDLE-FINGER MINDSET



Do you really want THAT finger
on the button?

MAD hillary series #3
"What, me worry?"



THE THREAT OF TERRORISM AS CLOSE AS
A CLINTON TO OVAL OFFICE

MAD hillary series #4
NANO-PRESIDENT



the danger of the unrelenting smallness
of bill + hillary clinton


MAD hillary series #5
SCHEMA PINOCCHIO



how the clintons are handling
the hillary dud factor




HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 1
BEWARE THE SYNERGY

Nixonian paranoia and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important,
easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.


HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 2
BEWARE THE SYNERGY
Nixonian paranoia and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important,
easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.


KLEIN BOOK CAUSES HILLARY TO (oops!) CONFIRM "THE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY"
CLINTON'S REACTION EXPOSES FASCISTIC MINDSET, TEXTBOOK CASE OF PARANOIA + MEGALOMANIA, AND A CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT IN BROADDRICK RAPE



 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005


75 posted on 12/12/2005 12:37:16 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: citizensgratitude
bump

 

BEAUTY AND THE HILDABEAST

JEANINE PIRRO: 30-year career fighting for the abused woman

 
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
 

 
HILLARY CLINTON: 30-year career abusing women


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
 

by Mia T, 6.26.05
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005



76 posted on 12/12/2005 12:48:50 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bttt


77 posted on 12/12/2005 12:50:26 PM PST by bmwcyle (Evolution is a myth -- Libertarians just won't evolve into Conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

thanx bmwcyle :)


78 posted on 12/12/2005 12:52:20 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: UWSrepublican

bump


79 posted on 12/12/2005 12:56:46 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

with corrections bump


80 posted on 12/12/2005 12:58:48 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson