Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach
The legal term of torture means to cause bodily organ failure and is already illegal. As well, I've never seen ANYTHING to suggest we engage in that type of torture.

The amendment uses the term of art "Cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment." There is TONS of law on the subject, and it is not a trivial matter to ascertain how the McCain amendment alters existing structure.

47 posted on 12/15/2005 9:01:56 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: All
From THE JURIST Legal News and Research:

[JURIST] AP is reporting that the White House has agreed to accept the McCain Amendment [JURIST document] that would ban the cruel and inhumane treatment of terror detainees, according to congressional officials. The White House has previously threatened to veto any legislation to which the amendment was attached and called for an exemption for CIA operatives.

52 posted on 12/15/2005 9:06:12 AM PST by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt

I'm sure it's not easy to determine whether this really impacts current legalities pertaining to torture; if you see an explanation that makes sense of this bill, could you please ping me? Thanks.


69 posted on 12/15/2005 9:21:51 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson