Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Student Gets Surprise From Mao's Book
Newsmax ^ | NewsMax

Posted on 12/18/2005 12:13:41 AM PST by Deek1969

What do you get when you try to check out Mao Tse-Tung's infamous "The Little Red Book" from the library?

A visit from Homeland Security agents.

At least that's what happened to a senior at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, according to the Standard-Times newspaper of New Bedford, Mass.

The college student was visited by federal agents two months ago, after he requested a copy of Mao's tome on communism. Two history professors at UMass Dartmouth, Brian Glyn Williams and Robert Pontbriand, said the student told them he requested the book through the college library's interlibrary loan program. The student, who was completing a research paper on Communism for Pontbriand's class on fascism and totalitarianism, filled out a form for the request, leaving his name, address, phone number and Social Security number.

He was later visited at his parents' home in New Bedford by two agents of the Department of Homeland Security, the professors told the Standard-Times. The professors said the student was told by the agents that the book is on a "watch list," and that his background, which included significant time abroad, triggered them to investigate the student further.

Although the Standard-Times knows the name of the student, the paper declined to name him because he is not coming forward because he fears repercussions should his name become public. He has not spoken to The Standard-Times.

The student told Pontbriand and Williams that the Homeland Security agents told him the book was on a "watch list." They brought the book with them, but did not leave it with the student, the professors said. Williams said in his research, he regularly contacts people in Afghanistan, Chechnya and other Muslim hot spots, and suspects that some of his calls are monitored. "My instinct is that there is a lot more monitoring than we think," he said. Williams said he had been planning to offer a course on terrorism next semester, but is reconsidering, because it might put his students at risk.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: communism; govwatch; hoax; hoaxes; homelandsecurity; libmyths; littleredbook; maotsetung; mass; myth; newbedford; standardtimes; thelittleredbook
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: hiredhand; planekT; glock rocks; Pete-R-Bilt; Brad's Gramma; yoe; Iowa Granny; Jackie222; ...

ping


61 posted on 12/19/2005 6:23:10 AM PST by B4Ranch (No expiration date is on the Oath to protect America from all enemies, foreign and domestic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

I don't believe the story at all. I think it's agitprop, similar to made up "racist vandalism" agitprop.


62 posted on 12/19/2005 7:34:27 AM PST by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Deek1969

This is very, very frightening. What's more frightening is that when I scroll down this thread to read the responses, a lot of people are going to be cheering having government spy on what people are reading. I wonder what president hillary will consider "subversive reading material" and who will be on her "watch list?"


63 posted on 12/19/2005 7:38:03 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gribbles141
>I checked out Revenge of the Sith, hardcover, and about 2 days later got a little visit from homeland security and Mace Windu

Well, I guess that means
I will be spending today
driving around to

local libraries
taking out all copies of
both Pamela books . . .


64 posted on 12/19/2005 7:40:41 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Any freepers that defend this action better keep their hypocrital mouths shut when Democrats abuse this power against conservatives.

I agree -- IF this really happened at all. Failing to name the student sets off alarms in my head.

65 posted on 12/19/2005 7:43:38 AM PST by Sloth (Freedom of speech doesn't mean the rest of us have to shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Deek1969
This story sounds fishy as hell to me. First, I can't imagine any decent sized university that would not already have Mao's rants in their collection. Second, it's available in it's entirety, Online.
66 posted on 12/19/2005 7:53:41 AM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV
Wait a minute. Who says this even happened? He refuses to release his own name? How about the names of the agents he was allegedly interviewed by? I do not for one minute put it past lefties to completely fabricate a story such as this, not for ONE minute.

My BS meter went off too. There are no sources. In fact, I would bet this whole story is fabricated.

67 posted on 12/19/2005 8:01:36 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
"This is very, very frightening."

No, this is very, very B.S.

"What's more frightening is that when I scroll down this thread to read the responses, a lot of people are going to be cheering having government spy on what people are reading."

I haven't been getting that from what I've read in the threads on this story. I've seen the majority of posters question the legitimacy of this story, and I've seen a couple of libertarians hyperventilating. I have not seen anyone openly cheer the government watching people who are checking out Mao's book. I have seen one thing occasionally that is disturbing on these threads. I have seen a could of libertarians taking a newspaper story and the testimony of a couple of professors as unimpeachable, and then immediately running to the top of the soap box to proclaim their horror. I really don't understand why any self respecting libertarian would use this story as their battle cry for freedom.
68 posted on 12/19/2005 10:24:35 AM PST by dbehsman (One Wellstone memorial (rave party) is enough, thank you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Deek1969
He was later visited at his parents' home in New Bedford by two agents of the Department of Homeland Security, the professors told the Standard-Times. The professors said the student was told by the agents that the book is on a "watch list," and that his background, which included significant time abroad, triggered them to investigate the student further.

Good. Nice to know DHS is doing its job.

Of course, the MSM would have us believe that even an investigation amounts to shocking, reprehensible abuse of an American citizen by thugs in black helicopters.

69 posted on 12/19/2005 10:29:52 AM PST by TChris ("Unless you act, you're going to lose your world." - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deek1969

This entire article is NOT passing the smell test. What's the student's name? What were the names of the agents? Has the reporter actually seen the inter-library request? And why on earth would someone need to check out "Little Red Book" via an inter-library loan when the dang thing is available online from thousands of sources. This is usually reserved for books that are rare or hard to come by, not something so readily availble as Mao's "work".


70 posted on 12/19/2005 10:32:35 AM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: didi; KarlInOhio

It is perfectly acceptable to cite an Internet source. Most (American) professors recognize this since Harbrace released the edition with instructions on citing Internet sources.


71 posted on 12/19/2005 10:40:45 AM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Riiight. I do that all the time.

You wouldn't believe the college students out there who put their Social on fairly public documents (tests, papers, etc) as a matter of habit. In the last class my wife taught, nearly 3/4 of the students wrote their Social right under their name. I almost had a heart attack the first one I saw, and did convulse just a little bit when I found that almost all of them did it.

72 posted on 12/19/2005 10:45:07 AM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal

I must say that I almost had a heart attack when I read your post there too.

Do these kids even realize what their setting themselves up for?!?!?!?!

YIKES!


73 posted on 12/19/2005 11:10:47 AM PST by dbehsman (NRA Life member and loving every minute of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: dbehsman
Do these kids even realize what their setting themselves up for?

These kids are apparently growing up thinking that privacy isn't something they will enjoy. They have also been trained in the Gumint Indoctrination Centers that your Social is not private. Danger Will Robinson! Danger!

74 posted on 12/19/2005 11:18:57 AM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal; dbehsman; 1rudeboy
>You wouldn't believe the college students out there who put their Social on fairly public documents

I don't know about
nowadays, but at college
in the 70s,

the main ID was
your social security
number, and the school

based ALL its tracking
on it, ALWAYS asked for it.
It was just normal

for students -- back then --
to put it on everything.
At least at my schools.

75 posted on 12/19/2005 11:19:26 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

Sure your Social was on all official school forms, but I'd never seen kids turning in work with there Social on it before that.

They tried to make your DL# here in GA your Social, and that didn't fly too well with the voters.


76 posted on 12/19/2005 1:38:06 PM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Kay Syrah
" They brought the book with them, but did not leave it with the student, the professors said.

Maybe they were Communist recruiters posing as Homeland Security agents.

Make at least as much sense as the other drivel in the story.

77 posted on 12/21/2005 3:02:55 PM PST by Fido969 ("And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free" (John 8:32).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

I'm sorry but you can not equate the writings of Mao, Marx and Hitler with those of Madison and Hamilton.


78 posted on 12/21/2005 3:32:04 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

Good Call!!!!


79 posted on 12/25/2005 6:16:34 AM PST by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Deek1969
Everyone here IS aware by now that this entire story was a fabrication and that none of it ever happened, right?

The student from UMass Dartmouth has now admitted to having made up the entire story of his having been visited by Homeland Security representatives.

Official follow up story by the same author

80 posted on 12/25/2005 6:35:22 AM PST by Lloyd227 (and may God bless Oriana Fallaci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson