Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John Jorsett

I have NO PROBLEM with getting a "receipt" from the machine, but to imply as the New York times does that the real threat to the integrity of our elections is the machines and not fake voters is quites simply not true.


4 posted on 12/18/2005 10:39:52 AM PST by salbam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: salbam
I have NO PROBLEM with getting a "receipt" from the machine

You probably already know this, but just to be clear to anyone else reading this, the proposal is not for a "receipt" in the commonly-understood sense. It's for a paper printout that would be retained by the polling station, and that would be the record consulted if there's a dispute. You don't want to hand anything to the voter because it could be used as proof to someone buying that person's vote.

5 posted on 12/18/2005 11:22:32 AM PST by John Jorsett (scam never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson