Skip to comments.Time to Investigate the Times
Posted on 12/18/2005 2:45:44 PM PST by smoothsailing
Time to Investigate the Times
By Richard N. Weltz
Clandestine secret spying against our enemies by agencies of the Executive Branch is hardly new. One of the most famous examples, of course, is the U-2 spy plane program authorized by President Eisenhower in the 50s. As Eisenhower explained at the time, "no one wants another Pearl Harbor." He felt it his duty to protect the nation regardless of legal technicalities.
The U-2 spying overflights of the USSR were revealed only when one of the pilots, Gary Powers, was shot down by the Soviets; otherwise, the missions would have continued in deep secrecy.
Since then, the 1970s saw a severe weakening of America's ability to collect and share intelligence among its various protective agencies such as the CIA, FBI, and DIAorchestrated by Sen. Frank Church, who did immeasurable damage to our intelligence establishment and made the need to bend rules even greater than it had been under Eisenhower.
Now revelations of secret, although carefully selective, interceptions of suspicious emails and phone calls between persons in the US and terror-connected individuals overseas have been made, not by an accident as in the U-2 case, but by the deliberate leak from presumably disgruntled bureaucrats to the New York Times a publication ever willing to print anything that will damage an administration (remember the Pentagon Papers) it doesn't like, regardless of the damage to national security.
In this case, the President made it clear in his address yesterday that:
"...the existence of this secret program was revealed in media reports after being improperly provided to news organizations. As a result, our enemies have learned information they should not have."
"The unauthorized disclosure of this effort damages our national security and puts our citizens at risk. Revealing classified information is illegal, alerts our enemies and endangers our country."
Obviously, classified information, harmful to the security of the United States and useful to its enemies, was illegally disclosed by one or more government employees. This is a serious matter, bordering on, if not actually constituting treason; and it is far more serious than the phony "outing" of a non-undercover publicity hound named Plame.
The President should immediately instruct the Justice Department to commence a full-scale investigation to determine who leaked this information, and see to it that those guilty are prosecuted to the full extent of applicable law. The investigation should be conducted by Justice's regular investigative staffno "special" or "independent" prosecutors wanted or needed; and one of it's primary and initial methods should be to subpoena management, editorial, and reportorial personnel at the New York Times under threat of jail time for contempt if they refuse to name the sources who provided this classified information to them.
For a second I thougt Time Magazine was going to join the 'good guys'.
This isn't about free speech anymore. Some people should be doing some hard time for compromising national security.
You can say that again. Where's the: "We must know now!"
This "scandal" is nothing more than a Book Promotion and a masking of the Iraq Vote!!
Pray for W and Our Victorious Troops
No. It's more than that. It's a breach of National Security and the NY Slimes and the leaker should be held accountable.
I hope President Bush drops the hammer on those stinking commie bast@rds.Shut that seditious propaganda mill down once and for all.
Reason # 659,329 why we should
NEVER enact a Federal journalist's shield law.
"Obviously, classified information, harmful to the security of the United States and useful to its enemies, was illegally disclosed by one or more government employees. This is a serious matter, bordering on, if not actually constituting treason..."
The Slimes and the Leaker(s) ARE a serious threat to National Security, PERIOD.
Compared to the "outing" of Plame this looks like a real crime. Wanna bet it gets swept under the rug? Very few in the MSM have thus far questioned the NYTs timing of this story or the motive for printing it.
The good news is that the NYT is losing the last of its credibility. They are nothing but a hack newspaper shilling for the DNC.
Bingo! This is a deliberate act of exposing a classified program in an attempt to smear the current administration.It is without a doubt illegal. No 1st Amendment protection here.
That's correct. No 1st Amendment protection for crimes.
I sincerely hope that tonight's Oval Office address has undergone a drastic rewrite...but I don't hold out much optimism.
I'm in agreement. I want frogmarching, a police booking, lots of pictures and time to draw a crowd.
Those commie pansies would faint dead away at the mere sight of real men.
"My fellow Americans. Tonight, I have ordered the arrest of the following United States Senators and their staff....."
Can I get an AMEN.
The leakers and the Times reporter must be lawyer shopping at this point. They should know Bush was not bluffing when he called the leaks illegal.
***It's a breach of National Security and the NY Slimes and the leaker should be held accountable.***
Thet are traitors to this country. I want a perp walk, and life in prison at the least.
It would be nice if such investigation took 30-60 days, rather than 2-3 years. I hope this leak is the straw that broke the camels back...
I think the reporter should be jailed for exposing the top secret program. This is definitly "loose lips sink ships" scenario.
"Is Time Warner Good For America?"
Time is "investigating" because they already wrote the story saying that NYT walks on water.
Time is the LAST "news" organization to be trusted.
..followed by frog gigging and frog boiling.
Ride 'em, SeaBiscuit. Ride 'em. Amen!
And done publicly so that America could watch it all on Prime Time television.
The new york times held the story for over 1 year.
According to my calculations, the leak occured late during the '04 campaign. A conincidence?????
The investigation should have begun and been concluded by now, with charges filed.
I want frogmarching, a police booking, lots of pictures and time to draw a crowd.
It won't happen unless Americans get angry and loud.
I don't get that either.The NYT says they sat on it for a year at the request of the administration.Just because the NYT says that, it doesn't make it so, obviously.
But still, if true, wouldn't the administration have been tipped off a year ago that there had to be a leaker somewhere?
You've left me speechless. Well done.
Who's been 'let go' in the last year?
I imagine a good number of people at all levels have left. One guy I'm personally wary of is Lawrence Wilkerson.
He was Colin Powell's chief of staff and has been bad-mouthing President Bush for about a year now.
I'm not saying it was him, but he may have been privy to the operation.
The DUmmies are cursing the NYT as well, although for not releasing the information. Seems we share something in common with the enemy.
Great post, thanks!
Powell has been very quiet, but just came out with some remarks...
Why was it necessary to do this spying without a warrant? Who determines that necessity? Who, ultimately, takes responsibility should that power be abused?
And a question for FReepers: Would you feel the same way if it was President Clinton?
I support the WoT wholeheartedly, but I also don't lightly give up my Constitutional rights.
Nor should you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.