Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AFTERWORD: ON CLINTON SMALLNESS--BRINKLEY MISSES THE POINT (CLINTON'S HOFSTRA APOLOGIA)
Hofstra University, History News Network ^ | 12.27.05 | Mia T

Posted on 12/27/2005 9:58:50 AM PST by Mia T

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: jla

bump


41 posted on 12/29/2005 6:08:39 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: malia

bump


42 posted on 12/29/2005 6:09:41 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
This is a wonderful thread Mia.

Quoting you:

Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.

If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger

Ya know, knowing the first part of this quote was advice from Albright ( Ms. Allwrong!) was geared to making Herr Klinton look like the great peacemaker (at any price, of course, including the demise of our national security which opened the door for 9-11)...well...it just goes to show ya that CHARACTER IS EVERYTHING! This pastey rapist demonstrated clearly his lack of character from the git to as president via the assignment of his cabinet and staff.

Klinton could NOT AFFORD to assign a cabinet that was on top of their game, he could NOT AFFORD to have intellects of great experience and wisdom advising him because they would have been confrontational and served to monitor and truly advise him...something an arrogant, ego driven fella like billy has no tolerance for, ever.

He and his 'me first-er wife in name only', brought in the cohens, the allbrights, etc who were total yesmen, easily manipulated (say, easy to trot out before the cameras to state how impossible it would be for klinton to pork a volunteer girl in our oval office). Folks just like the klintons, willing to do whatever it takes to get the win.

Without good character....one cannot afford to associate with those who are acquainted with good character.

klinton chose the easiest personal route every single time...risk taking was not in his sight...popularity polls and orgasmic delights left no room for genuine leadership.

Any man who frets about his legacy, openly, has major psychological problems.

No major travesty would have caused this girlish metro-sexual to meet greatness; his tremendous lack of character, caused by a deep and abiding self-centeredness which caused him to make every decision upon how each would impact his 'likeableness' or grant him personal gain can be seen not only in his speech patterns but in his actions....

Every rapist is a power abuser.

And every rapist holds others in total and complete contempt.

43 posted on 12/29/2005 7:03:39 AM PST by Republic (I have AMAZING confidence in and TRUST in our PRESIDENT! I LOVE HIM and his ENTIRE TEAM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Douglas Brinkley...... "I don't think bill clinton ever reached that category".

"One, it's hard if you're not a wartime president"

Note to Douglas Brinkley (NTDB):
clinton WAS a wartime president. The problem is, he surrendered.

Preemptively.

You might say the clinton approach to The War on Terror was the perverse obverse of The Bush Doctrine.

"or have some huge event".

NTDB: clinton had one almost immediately, which he summarily ignored, the first attack on American soil since Pearl Harbor, the 1993 WTC bombing.

Do you recall that he urged us to ignore the bombing, too? Ignore the first major Islamofascist terrorist attack on the continental United States?!

Did you know clinton never visited the site? (And he was only 15 minutes away mere days after the bombing. He chose, instead, to give some forgettable speech on --what else? -- the economy.)

44 posted on 12/29/2005 8:50:44 AM PST by malia (The Impeached x42 clinton - a Paper Tiger President! MSM - bottom feeders! What a team!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


45 posted on 12/29/2005 8:54:44 AM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: malia
Thanks, Malia.
Your post alerted me to the fact that
unless you play the
video clip of clinton and Douglas Brinkley,
it 's a bit unclear who's saying all that.
So I added the attribution to each section of the quote
before posting it on the new
clinton legacy page of deletehillary.com.



The term "great" is probably an overused term. There are only a few presidents who make that top tier: Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, Franklin Roosevelt, Theodore Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Thomas Jefferson, and a few others who might be there.

I don't think bill clinton ever reached that category.

One, it's hard if you're not a wartime president

Douglas Brinkley
Nov. 12, 2005
History News Network
Refuting clinton's Hofstra-apologia "Brinkley" lie

Note to Douglas Brinkley:
clinton WAS a wartime president. The problem is, he surrendered.

Preemptively.

You might say the clinton approach to The War on Terror was the perverse obverse of The Bush Doctrine.

or have some huge event.

Douglas Brinkley
ibid.

Note to Douglas Brinkley:
clinton had one almost immediately, which
he summarily ignored, the first attack on American soil since Pearl Harbor, the 1993 WTC bombing.

Do you recall that he urged us to ignore the bombing, too? Ignore the first major Islamofascist terrorist attack on the continental United States?!

Did you know clinton never visited the site? (And he was only 15 minutes away mere days after the bombing. He chose, instead, to give some forgettable speech on --what else? -- the economy.)

 

Second, clinton is not known for something like Lyndon Johnson was -- The Civil Rights Act -- or even Theodore Roosevelt and conservation, or one big thing.

I think his successes were in welfare reform, economic discipline,trade pacts.

Douglas Brinkley
ibid.

Note to Douglas Brinkley:
Arguable. He was dragged kicking and screaming by the Republicans.

Those are achievements, but they're hard to get people queuing up a hundred years from now excited to see the "NAFTA Pen Under Glass."

Douglas Brinkley
ibid.

Note to Douglas Brinkley:
Great turn of phrase.


46 posted on 12/30/2005 5:08:31 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Republic
Thanx, Republic. Excellent points. The clintons pick only weak, naive and/or corrupt people. Cohen, I seem to recall, had some questionable dealings with Red China.

Lopez: What exactly was U.S. reaction to the attack on the USS Cole?

 

Miniter: In October 2000, al Qaeda bombed the USS Cole in Aden, Yemen. Seventeen sailors were killed in the blast. The USS Cole was almost sunk. In any ordinary administration, this would have been considered an act of war. After all, America entered the Spanish-American war and World War I when our ships were attacked.

Counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke had ordered his staff to review existing intelligence in relation to the bombing of the USS Cole. After that review, he and Michael Sheehan, the State Department's counterterrorism coordinator, were convinced it was the work of Osama bin Laden. The Pentagon had on-the-shelf, regularly updated and detailed strike plans for bin Laden's training camps and strongholds in Afghanistan.

At a meeting with Secretary of Defense William Cohen, Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, Attorney General Janet Reno, and other staffers, Clarke was the only one in favor of retaliation against bin Laden. Reno thought retaliation might violate international law and was therefore against it. Tenet wanted to more definitive proof that bin Laden was behind the attack, although he personally thought he was. Albright was concerned about the reaction of world opinion to a retaliation against Muslims, and the impact it would have in the final days of the Clinton Middle East peace process. Cohen, according to Clarke, did not consider the Cole attack "sufficient provocation" for a military retaliation. Michael Sheehan was particularly surprised that the Pentagon did not want to act. He told Clarke: "What's it going to take to get them to hit al Qaeda in Afghanistan? Does al Qaeda have to attack the Pentagon?"

Instead of destroying bin Laden's terrorist infrastructure and capabilities, President Clinton phoned twice phoned the president of Yemen demanding better cooperation between the FBI and the Yemeni security services.

If Clarke's plan had been implemented, al Qaeda's infrastructure would have been demolished and bin Laden might well have been killed. Sept. 11, 2001 might have been just another sunny day.

Clinton's Loss?
How the previous administration fumbled on bin Laden.
A Q&A by Kathryn Jean Lopez
NRO
September 11, 2003, 11:45 a.m.


47 posted on 12/30/2005 5:56:33 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: All

WAR AND TREASON AND THE NEW YORK TIMES

by Mia T, December 29, 2005
 

 

COMPLETE ARTICLE WITH FOOTNOTES

48 posted on 01/02/2006 3:47:16 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Haven't read the entire article yet, I was SO ANGRY I could not stand it. Period. Put a strong call into the NYT today...and have an email I will post here later for the national news editor....have to run and get dinner out...my anger over the NYT (in general but ESPECIALLY today) must have boosted my metabolism because I have accomplished a great deal today and am still running on adrenaline because of that slimey, Goebbel's like rag.

Talk about dishonesty! It is time for a name change at the NYT. No newspaper should be able to openly abuse the facts as this major rag has done since forever.

49 posted on 01/02/2006 3:57:51 PM PST by Republic (I have AMAZING confidence in and TRUST in our PRESIDENT! I LOVE HIM and his ENTIRE TEAM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: jla

bump


50 posted on 01/05/2006 7:02:56 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


51 posted on 01/05/2006 3:33:15 PM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: jla

bump


52 posted on 01/05/2006 4:52:39 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Republic

bump

The NYT has become a farce of a farce, thanks in no small measure to Pinch.

That the leftist media still take their marching orders from this laughable source would be embarrassing but for the absence of gray matter all around.

Did you ever send that email? Would love to see it.


53 posted on 01/05/2006 5:10:51 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


54 posted on 01/06/2006 8:43:38 AM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

bump


55 posted on 01/08/2006 5:56:25 PM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson