Impeach the President? Bring It On!

The American Enterprise Online ^ | 12/28/05 | Joseph Knippenberg

[Red6]

An impeachment will fail big. It's a big show where they try to tarnish you by "talking" about it.

It's a farce.

Red6

[nuffsenuff]

This is precisely why the Dems won't even try to put forward articles of impeachment.

[thoughtomator]

They should do the same thing they did to the talk of withdrawing from Iraq... float a bill and force the Democrats to vote on it.

[jammer]

Won't be any impeachment in 2006. But wait until 2007. These elections are important for that factor alone. A shift in the House and momentum may build.

[Semper Paratus]

Some 'rat moonbat will take the bait and file Articles of Impeachment.

[COEXERJ145]

And you'd just love to see the President impeached, wouldn't you?

[new yorker 77]

Democrats were in bad shape in 1998.

Republicans intended to impeach Clinton, but loudmouths made it a campaign promise.

The public was uncomfortable with it enough to not reward the GOP in 1998 at the polls when they would have gained seats by just holding their cards.

The Democrats can not control their kooks. They are showing their cards and the public that may have turned against the GOP in 2006 will not reward Democrats for their insanity.

As bad as conservatives seem to think it is when they fall for FAKE NEWS and FAKE POLLS, it isn't that bad.

The best thing the GOP has going for them is an organized kookdome of leftists in the Democratic Party that scare the crap out of voters every election cycle.

The GOP will gain in the House and Senate in 2006 as a result. It will not be the first time or the last time that this happens.

[bigfootbob]

John "reparations" Conyers

[jammer]

Thanks for putting wrong words in my mouth, as I notice you do frequently. To answer your silly post, absolutely not. President Bush is destroying conservatism enough as it is without adding that. It would be disastrous and the last thing I want to see.

[HHKrepublican_2]

Even if the Dems get a majority in the house, there are some DINO's who wont vote for it.

[Valin]

I have not checked, but I bet the boys & girls at DU are real excited about it.

[smoothsailing]

These politicians have been joined by a few serious commentators, including Newsweeks Jonathan Alter..

That's a stretch.

[Valin]

If you (or anyone else for that matter) think the House is going Democrat next year, I got a bridge I can let you have real cheap.

[COEXERJ145]

Well, there are some members of FR who have said they are going to campaign for Democrats in 2006 in order to help them retake the House and "impeach BuSHIT".

Of course these are the same kooks who have hated President Bush since day one and think there is some great Bush-Fox-Clinton conspiracy afloat to destroy the U.S.

[BuglerTex]

Another great find, Valin. And another spokesman to keep up with as well.

Bring it on, indeed. Come on out and get gored.

[MNJohnnie]

Guess the Democrat's still haven't read the polls that show 57% of DEMOCRATS agree with President Bush on NSA Wiretaps.

[Valin]

Bush-Fox-Clinton conspiracy afloat to destroy the U.S.

There's only one thing to be done about this conspiracy....HIDE UNDER THE BED.
As we are all doomed...DOOMED I say.

[Owen]

If the Democrats take the House -- and remember that they've aggressively recruited Iraq veterans to run in 2006 -- there are no questions whatsoever about it . . . they will hold impeachment hearings, dominate TV news coverage and probably win the vote.

That is what we have to look forward to in 2006 if we don't win.

Think about that when you read the screams from the immigration focused freepers who insist that the RNC must have a funding boycott.

Think about how much you'll enjoy watching those hearings and them winning such a vote. Don't think "DINOs" will save you. If there is ANYTHING that would galvanize the DNC leadership to whip every member into line, it would be this.

[capydick]

These people want to impeach the only President who has chosen to fight terrorism. Bring it on!!