Skip to comments.
BREAKTHROUGH OF THE YEAR:
Evolution in Action
Science ^
| December 2005
| Elizabeth Culotta and Elizabeth Pennisi
Posted on 01/03/2006 12:16:26 PM PST by MRMEAN
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-233 next last
To: MRMEAN
Ithink what he meant was, how many times do we have to defend evolution against those who chose to remain ignorant.
21
posted on
01/03/2006 12:38:10 PM PST
by
js1138
(Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
To: My2Cents
From an ID perspective, this is evidence that chimps and humans have the same designer, and that much of the same proven design that went into the chimp was also applied to humans.
Yes, but if they were vastly different that would also be evidence of a designer, as the designer was making clear distinctions between seperate works. For ID, any potential observation can be called "evidence" because there's no falsification criteria.
The conclusions regarding evolution aren't merely based upon the percentage of similarity, but also in how the similarities occur, such as identical broken Vitamin C synthesis genes and identical inserted ERV code at the same points in the DNA.
22
posted on
01/03/2006 12:38:56 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: MRMEAN
Recently, I read that a common field mouse has about a 97% match with human DNA.
Is this accurate?
23
posted on
01/03/2006 12:39:03 PM PST
by
Seeking the truth
(0cents.com - Freep Stuff & Pajama Patrol Stuff)
To: dubie
24
posted on
01/03/2006 12:39:13 PM PST
by
My2Cents
(Dead people voting is the closest the Democrats come to believing in eternal life.)
To: MRMEAN
Then you're forgiven. But trust me...it's been posted at least once before, about a week ago.
25
posted on
01/03/2006 12:40:31 PM PST
by
My2Cents
(Dead people voting is the closest the Democrats come to believing in eternal life.)
To: js1138
Ithink what he meant was, how many times do we have to defend evolution against those who chose to remain ignorant.When the forces of willful ignorance leave our children alone, then we can rest.
Until then, soldier on!
26
posted on
01/03/2006 12:40:48 PM PST
by
highball
("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
To: mc6809e
What's REALLY amazing is that, with all the information available on-line concerning evolution, you could still be so ignorant of the theory.Is your choice of words a concession to the other side or simply an oversight on your part?
27
posted on
01/03/2006 12:41:55 PM PST
by
tx_eggman
(If we had some bacon we could have bacon and eggs ... if we had some eggs.)
To: Semper Paratus
"It is amazing how all that DNA code just 'came together' by itself."
Yeah, that would be amazing. However, it never happened. DNA coding does not just "come together." Only those ignorant of biology would ever say so.
28
posted on
01/03/2006 12:44:24 PM PST
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: My2Cents
A friend of mine who's a plant geneticist tells me that about 85% of the human DNA is identical to that of the pumpkin.
So? You ID'ers are always trying to wreck stuff for me. I'm a freakin' DINOSAUR!!!
COWER BEFORE ME, WEAKLY HUMAN!!!
AND CHECK OUT THE CHICK I'M GONNA MAKE IT WITH!
Owl_Eagle(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,
it was probably sarcasm)
29
posted on
01/03/2006 12:45:54 PM PST
by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: tx_eggman
Do you know what "theory" means in this context?
30
posted on
01/03/2006 12:51:43 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: MRMEAN
with life as we know it all stemming from evolution and accident, isn't it odd that ALL animals and humans are so symmetrical? As if someone purposely made them? Evolution must have been the most perfect accident ever, to have so many species be so perfect.
To: Echo Talon
with life as we know it all stemming from evolution and accident, isn't it odd that ALL animals and humans are so symmetrical?
No. Why do you find that odd?
As if someone purposely made them?
Why would you expect that symmetry requires purpose?
Evolution must have been the most perfect accident ever, to have so many species be so perfect.
Either that or asymmetrical life forms are generally at a survival disadvantage, thus never really gained a footing. Do you even understand the most basic concepts of evolution or are you just spouting from a position of total ignorance?
32
posted on
01/03/2006 1:02:13 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
Do you know what "theory" means in this context? I'm thinkin' that, in this context
theory = theory
Or, in order for me to fully understand, must I first know what the meaning of "is" is?
33
posted on
01/03/2006 1:02:46 PM PST
by
tx_eggman
(If we had some bacon we could have bacon and eggs ... if we had some eggs.)
To: tx_eggman
I'm thinkin' that, in this context
theory = theory
And what, exactly, do you think is the meaning of that word? What do you think that the use of the word "theory" implies?
Or, in order for me to fully understand, must I first know what the meaning of "is" is?
No, but it is helpful to understand what "theory" means in the context of science, as too many people seem to think that it implies a status of little more than a guess.
34
posted on
01/03/2006 1:04:32 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: My2Cents
From an ID perspective, this is evidence that chimps and humans have the same designer, and that much of the same proven design that went into the chimp was also applied to humans. So, lobsters were built by a different working team?
Honestly, if the evidence supports a theory that works without introducing an un-named "designer" (wink, wink, nudge, nudge), why do you find it necessary to do so?
35
posted on
01/03/2006 1:04:42 PM PST
by
Junior
(Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
To: Echo Talon
with life as we know it all stemming from evolution and accident, isn't it odd that ALL animals and humans are so symmetrical? No. Symmetry is a cheap feature.
As if someone purposely made them?
Non sequitur.
Evolution must have been the most perfect accident ever, to have so many species be so perfect.
You have set a very low bar for "perfect".
36
posted on
01/03/2006 1:08:41 PM PST
by
tortoise
(All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
To: dubie
Is this the "first bold fish" to come ashore?
To: Dimensio
Just asking the question... Why not 4 fingers on one hand and 3 on the other? seems very odd for so many species to be so perfect to be an accident, look at some skeletons...
To: Echo Talon
Why not 4 fingers on one hand and 3 on the other?
Have you considered that symmetry is actually an easier feature?
seems very odd for so many species to be so perfect to be an accident,
I don't consider my broken vitamin C synthesis gene (found in all great apes, including humans) to be "perfect".
39
posted on
01/03/2006 1:13:59 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
The fossil record reveals that over 90% of all species have gone extinct. The designer has some explaining to do.
40
posted on
01/03/2006 1:16:53 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-233 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson