Posted on 01/05/2006 12:54:59 PM PST by underwiredsupport
Noe THAT'S a Mitzvah!
For this to work for Tehran, strategists must assume that either the initial strike will be devastating enough to prevent a conventional or nuclear counterattack by Israel, or that Israel's rumored nuclear arsenal is just a bluff and doesn't really exist.
The next step would be dealing with a response from America and Europe. It would be logical for them to conclude that Europe will respond only with a conventional attack, if any attack at all. They may also believe that we will not have the stomach to "nuke Iranian civilians because of their government" (and they would be correct).
For this to work for Tehran, strategists must assume that either the initial strike will be devastating enough to prevent a conventional or nuclear counterattack by Israel, or that Israel's rumored nuclear arsenal is just a bluff and doesn't really exist.
The next step would be dealing with a response from America and Europe. It would be logical for them to conclude that Europe will respond only with a conventional attack, if any attack at all. They may also believe that we will not have the stomach to "nuke Iranian civilians because of their government" (and they would be correct).
"Israeli Air Force officials are "frustrated" over the Defense Ministry's agreeing to allow the F-16I jets to be equipped with American-made radar."
Why ?"
Now that you see the United Arab Emirates receiving AN/APG-80s with their F-16s. The Israeli's wanted to fit their own radars and seemed unhappy with the radar fit on their F-16Is.
Radar concerns cast shadow over F-16I buy
ALON BEN-DAVID JDW Correspondent
Tel Aviv
The Israel Air Force (IAF) is "highly dissatisfied" with the Northrop Grumman AN/APG-68(V)9 radar installed in its new F-16I multirole fighters, according to senior Israeli defence sources.
With the first of 102 Lockheed Martin F-16Is scheduled to arrive in Israel on 19 February, a growing number of defence officials are now criticising the procurement.
JDW has learned that following a series of test flights at Lockheed Martin's facility in Fort Worth, Texas, IAF pilots assessed the synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) mode of the AN/APG-68(V)9 to be "below IAF operational standards".
Israel's former minister of defence, Moshe Arens, who negotiated the F-16I deal, told JDW he is not surprised to learn about the radar's performance problems. "Our intention was to install Israeli-made radar in the F-16Is, but the US government made the whole sale conditional on the purchase of US-made radar. I argued that [Israel Aircraft Industries' subsidiary] Elta's radar had a proven better performance and lesser cost than the US radars, but the Americans were unrelenting," Arens said.
The Israel Defence Force (IDF) spokesperson's office declined to comment on the matter, and a spokesperson for Lockheed Martin said that "the issue is between the Israeli and the US governments".
Senior IAF officers have recently met with both Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman executives and presented them with what they described as "performance problems of the radar". IAF sources said that "once the aircraft arrive in Israel, further tests will be conducted in co-ordination with the manufacturer".
However, according to a Northrop Grumman spokesman, the company hosted a SAR "summit" for all key principals in January 2004, at the US government's request, to evaluate the radar's performance. At the end of that session, the parties agreed that the radar had met all its performance specifications, that the development phase was completed and that the IAF should now evaluate the radar in its own environment.
IAF sources said that in 1999 the service's preferred option was for Lockheed Martin's F-16I over Boeing's F-15I - partly because an offer to purchase two batches of 50 aircraft had significantly lowered the price per unit. However, the $4.4 billion F-16I deal, Israel's largest-ever single procurement, is now under increasing scrutiny by both former and current defence officials.
"I don't think we should have decided in 1999 on fighters we will still be receiving in 2008," said Brig Gen Eival Giladi, who until last December was head of strategic planning for the IDF. "I am not worried about their technology, but I'm not sure that what we will need in 2008 are fighters. We should have opted for the smaller [F-15] deal. Even though we would have lost the considerable discount, we would have gained much more freedom to decide later on the structure of our air force."
Arens, who supported the F-16I deal at the time, said: "In perspective, it could be that we were a little hasty. Considering the strategic changes in the region, I am not sure we should have made that deal."
While IAF Commander Maj Gen Dan Halutz (now IDF Deputy Chief of Staff elect) maintained that the F16I procurement "was the right decision then and still is today", other senior officers are questioning the decision, which committed a large part of US Foreign Military Financing (FMF) to Israel for almost a decade.
The IDF's budget was drastically reduced in the last two years, making the FMF the only available funds for new procurements.
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon recently added NIS1 billion ($224.2 million) to the 2004 defence budget, totalling NIS33.4 billion, and pledged an additional NIS1.6 billion in 2005.
Thanks for info on the F-16I. How many bunker busters can it carry? Three bombing waves may be needed with each wave penetrating deeper. Plus how many of these aircraft does Israel have?
TIME HAS COME TODAY!
Watch out Iran with all your hollow boasting and threats of genocide
Nah... The USAF KC10 just happens to be closeby :). We're only there to give our friend a little hand.
Will the F-16Is get the ELM-2052 AESA radar that ELTA is developing??Would be pretty weird if it wins lots of export orders without a single sale to the IDF!!
HOw about the F-22. It could use a combat test.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.