"not to force the Islamic Republic to cut short the dialogue process and to opt for another scenario"
Translation: Don't make us go to planB... you wouldn't like planB.
"We are for a strategy based on dialogue, but if the counterparty Europe plays dirty, then we will pass onto another plan that we have worked out and then there will be problems for the Europeans."
Translation: Our strategy is to keep talking to you WHILE we work on our nuke program. BUT if you don't talk to us, we have some other ideas (Iraq instability, hezbulla making trouble in israel, international terror) that means trouble for you.
"In this game, we are for a result that will be satisfactory to both Iran and Europe,"
Translation: Ideally, we would control most of Europe, collect tribute from fwance, and destory the USA.
"if we lose, the same will also happen to the other party (Europe) and they will have to prepare themselves to live in a hell."
Translation: If we go down, we're taking you all with us... nuclear winter for all!
"A small error on the part of USA or the Zionists will be enough to induce us to unleash hell,"
Translation: We'd love an excuse and a way to bomb the USA outright instead of unreliable alqueda connections
"They know this very well and for this they haven't gone further than a verbal or psychological war," he said.
Translation: We know they publically leaked they were warning neighboring nations the USA might need to attack Iran suddenly soon, and to be prepared. So this is our coutnerpunch.
"does not have any intension of renouncing its cycle of producing nuclear fuel."
Translation: By the way, you Euroweenies, and UN and all can still forget us giving anything up at all.
"For our requirements we do not intend to trust even our friends," he said, stressing Iran's right to "advance the research in all the areas of the nuclear sector."
Translation: We don't even trust the Syirans anymore... Asswad might be needing some large barining chips pretty soon and we don't want to be caught with our pants down. Also we reserve the right to research nuke weapons down the road if we feel like it.
"To start the research and study, does not always signify establishing an atomic programme,"
Translation: Until the last screw is turned on the casing... it 'TECHNICALLY' isn't a complete nuke... just as my buddy MoHamHead at the IAEA.
"We are not disposed to imposing someone else's [proposal], but to find a neutral and constructive proposal,"
Transation: Either we win and you loose, or everybody looses.
posted on 01/05/2006 3:40:27 PM PST
(I'm in no Al-Samood for this Shi'ite.)
What they are doing is using the old Neville Chamberlain maneuver. This was very successful just prior to WWII.
posted on 01/05/2006 3:51:28 PM PST
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson