Posted on 01/05/2006 7:35:51 PM PST by Velveeta
bookmark
Velveeta, the article is priceless.
As I read it and saw the name Mary Riley, I kept waiting for her to be killed in the Starbucks coffee shop.
Does anyone remember that un-solved murder in D.C., it always turns up with the clinton reports.
If the dead ladies name isn't Mary Riley, then what is it?
From the search, yours, appears to still be alive.
The one that I am talking about in the coffee shop murder, was an intern, friend of Monica's, or so my memory goes.
http://www.google.com/search?client=googlet&q=Secret%20Service%20agent%2C%20Ms.%20Mary%20Riley
This says that Clinton pardoned a man named Riley. Is he related to Mary?
http://www.google.com/search?client=googlet&q=mary%20riley%20connection%20clinton
Found it, the murdered lady was Mary Mahoney, so I was half right on the name....
http://www.google.com/search?client=googlet&q=woman%20murdered%20in%20a%20starbucks%20coffee%20shop%20washington%2C%20DC
All yankee government police can get a subpoena for records. In Georgia, local law enforcement has to have a warrant to get phone records and almost everything else. Except bank records, local law enforcement can still get bank records w/o court order.
Up until about 20 years ago local cops did the same thing as the yankee government police do, but the Georgia Supreme Court said it wasn't legal. What they'd do is get a subpoena for those records to be sent to the grand jury. But in lieu of taking it directly to the grand jury, it could be sent to Detective So-and-so. Georgia SC said that wasn't legal.
Because the yankee government does so much of its investigating through a grand jury anyway, it still does this (though I don't know that it's ever been tested with SCOTUS, but one would certainly presume so).
In a major case that you're familiar with where the local cops worked with the yankee police, they found it was faster and easier to get a judge to sign a warrant than to seek records on subpoena through the yankee bureaucracy.
Sure was interesting to see that Clinton pardon list again.
He did have quite the affinity for pardoning the cocaine dealers.
If he didn't need court approval to order the bombing (or at least order the cover up) in the first place why would he need a court order to hide anything that implicates him?
Interesting. Its a talk line now. I didn't try the PIN, though.
O John, now... there's a sticky wicket. ;-)
ROFL. I didn't even think to try the phone number.
I suspect I'm not the only guy that's tried the number.
Well, I'm glad you checked.
Refresh my memory. Who was president then??? Who was Attorney General??? It wasn't either one of the Bushes. (Being semi-sarcastic here)
Bookmarked! Good find.
Keep reading.
We figured out further down the thread who the president was at the time. ;-)
Thank you.
"They gathered all this info and have still refused to admit what Jayna Davis and many of us know --- the Iraqi connection to OKC."
Or the plane that was blown up over New York.
Jayna provided affidavits from 22 eye witnesses that the FBI later claimed they never received. Jayna has them on tape.
That's my question too. Doesn't seem this info would require a court order.
Or the jihadi who flew the plane into the ocean.
I concur that the OKC investigation was a fraud as well...
But do you believe it would be an equally futile exercise in re-opening the Waco, Vince Foster, Flight 800 etal. investigative files?
I believe the respective investigations cover-ups were so sloppy, it wouldn't take a whole heckuva lot to find out the truth...
Aaaah -- but does ANYONE in either Party want THE truth exposed??
And WHY NOT??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.