Skip to comments.California Psychologist Wants 'Extreme Bias' Against Homosexuals Added To 'DSM'
Posted on 01/06/2006 4:48:13 PM PST by lizol
click here to read article
The eastern block communists used to classify political criminals as mentally ill so they had some justification to send them to the gulags.
Besides Cameron's reputation as a notorious fraud
what he's really saying is he bought the lie pushed by homosexual activists Mark Pietrzyk and Andrew Sullivan. We've tried to tell punster that he took their bait hook, line and sinker but he apparently doesn't care.
We've provided links but he's just not interested:
So Gay Bashing is suddenly OK now because a perp can't
help it, he just has a mental disorder?
I agree, with the 'politics' problem..
"However, the biological imperative to reproduce is secondary only to that of survival and homosexuality poses a distraction.."
By their very 'nature' on both counts Homosexuals are dead in the water so to speak, unless there are alternatives available to them for reproduction and hence long term 'survival'.. since only immediate survival is an end in itself. And the road to 'alternatives' opens another can of worms.
BTW, is FR slow tonite?
Can anyone tell me where I can find an official list of love crimes? I'll even settle for "like" crimes.
So plead insanity. The good doctor says your a mental case.
I wonder if that is where the concept came from in Batman Begins for the Scarecrow.
Sick research psychiatrist who experimented on patients.
Yeah, the means of "reproduction" of and for homosexuality IS to prey upon vulnerable others to influence them by indirect or direct violation, to introduce others to homosexuality by predation, however subtle.
It's a cultural phenomenon, dependent upon cultural means to "reproduce" and that's exactly what's being said by the very theme of this thread's article: to my view, corrupt sociological processes to modify cultural norms and thereby, to "reproduce."
That's the dark side of things, but it's, actually, the reality on a purely biological level. Predation and survival have their dark side if/when the emotional is applied to behaviors, but, as to homosexuality as some proliferating social issue -- it certainly seems to be directly responsible for creating a great deal of destructiveness among humans and human culture and always by way of some surreptitious, manipulative process -- there's only one means available to 'survive' on a reproductory level and that's to replicate by means other than the biological reproductive process.
I also am sure that that's primarily why so many heterosexuals reject however subtley or overtly, homosexuals. Most of us can sense a degree of unreliability there and it does pose a problem to a certain degree upon the species. Thus, the species is right and accurate to suspect and consider sharply certain behaviors by some.
It has little to do with something BAD, as homosexuals are want to try to define it, but that on a biological basis, their behaviors and 'mentality' poses a threat to the species itself. Individuals within the human species are actually 'correct' or right in that sense, to consider homosexuality as a problem to avoid or to disassociate from.