Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Psychologist Wants 'Extreme Bias' Against Homosexuals Added To 'DSM'
NARTH ^ | January 6, 2006

Posted on 01/06/2006 4:48:13 PM PST by lizol

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-109 next last
To: lizol
Where have I heard this before?

"As per Soviet psychiatry and as enunciated by Premier Nikita Khrushchev in 1959: "Can there be diseases, nervous diseases among certain people in the communist society? Evidently there can be. If that is so, then there also will be offenses which are characteristic of people with abnormal mindsTo those who might start calling for opposition to communism on this 'basis,' we say that now, too, there are people who fight against communismbut clearly the mental state of such people is not normal."(4)

In other words, it is impossible for people in a socialist society to have an anticommunist morality. Criminality is impossible in a socialist society and those opposed to the socialist order are not really criminals requiring punishment but madmen who require treatment and rehabilitation in psychiatric facilities. And so, José Abrantes, then Minister of the Interior, speaking to Cuban psychologists in March 1987 admitted that his Ministry "has the most diverse, universal, and decisive application of psychology to law enforcement."(5)"

Link: Psychology and the Gulag

51 posted on 01/06/2006 5:52:34 PM PST by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

Headline: Washi wants DSM to revert back to when it correctly listed Homosexuality as a mental disorder.


52 posted on 01/06/2006 5:55:03 PM PST by Washi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
They did remove pedophilia from the DSM just last year. At least that is what I heard reported on a radio news break.

I did a quick search and it appears there was indeed a call to have pedophilia removed back in May of 2005, but the APA rejected it...at least for now.

This does not bode well for the future when absolute abominations are justified as "alternate lifestyles."

53 posted on 01/06/2006 5:56:43 PM PST by Prime Choice (We are RepubliCANs, not RepubliCAN'Ts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: All

This is the same APA that worked overtime to get "professionals" in the mental health industry to declare that Barry Goldwater was insane.

Nothing new here. Move along, folks.


54 posted on 01/06/2006 5:58:40 PM PST by AZ_Cowboy (Barry Goldwater hates me! A newbie told me so, folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Pedophilia has not been removed, though there was a conference held in (of course) San Francisco discussing whether it should be (along with a host of other paraphlias). Expects transvestites to be the next group "freed" from their illness.

Few realize it, but bestiality was removed in 1994. Yes, humans and animals are capable of sharing lasting, intimate bonds, and if you happen to fall in love with a sheep, that's okay, says the APA.

Yes, they're FUBAR. And yes, their arguments are composed of the multicultural, diversity is the pinnacle of existence, goobly gab B.S.

As someone in med school, if I end up matching in psychiatry (unlikely), I'd love to wage war with these morons.


55 posted on 01/06/2006 6:10:15 PM PST by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=%5CCulture%5Carchive%5C200306%5CCUL20030611c.html

Ah, here's the link on the meeting that was held. It doesn't appear as if pedophilia will be removed soon, but I could be wholly wrong on that. It's amazing to me how quickly the media took to the homosexual agenda.


56 posted on 01/06/2006 6:14:47 PM PST by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: lizol

They're sodomites, but if we think that's wrong...we have a mental disease? What an upside down world we live in.


57 posted on 01/06/2006 6:17:03 PM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

And the beat goes on. "One thing is for certain, it ain't never gonna stop"...Bob Seeger


58 posted on 01/06/2006 6:17:07 PM PST by Supernatural (All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie! bob dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I don't think we realize the full ramifications of this potential decision. It will provide a circumvention of First Amendment rights in a way that has never been seen before. ANY "undesired" behavior can be made "pathological" and THAT is the beginning of the end.


59 posted on 01/06/2006 6:19:09 PM PST by OldArmy94
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: lizol
This is great!

I finally have an inside angle on getting a disability check!

60 posted on 01/06/2006 6:19:30 PM PST by LK44-40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

btt


61 posted on 01/06/2006 6:20:00 PM PST by Ciexyz (Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol
California Psychologist Wants 'Extreme Bias' Against Homosexuals Added To 'DSM'

This is certainly sufficient evidence that being a California Psychologist is Pathalogical and should also be added to the DSM !!!

62 posted on 01/06/2006 6:22:26 PM PST by rundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CheyennePress
Thank you for the correction and the link to more info.

Keep your political leanings close to the vest until you get your degree. Then let 'em have it. ; )

63 posted on 01/06/2006 6:26:25 PM PST by TigersEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: GeneralStorm
"Another attempt to smear Bible-believing Christians. Next thing you know, they'll have us shot."

Or crucified.
64 posted on 01/06/2006 6:29:23 PM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

To: lizol

If a psychological abnormality (what used to be called a "mental illness") is defined as a deviation from the norm, then it is statistically more valid to call homosexuality a psychopathology than the hatred of homosexuality. In other words, it is far more statistically likely that people HATE homosexuals than that they ARE homosexuals.


66 posted on 01/06/2006 6:48:16 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol
The sodomites intimidated the APA into taking their mental illness out of the DSM IV and with a stroke of the pen the sodomite life style went from being a mental disorder to just a plain ole life style choice (later it was characterized as a genetic predisposition 'no choice').

Their new power grab is to promote the idea that those who criticize or characterize them as mentally ill or immoral are the ones in need of 'mental health' services...

America is in the fight of it's life with enemies foreign and domestic..from without and within-as well as political, economic, cultural, and spiritual.

The sodomite agenda is to shut down God's word on the subject...and make the bible 'hate speech' at least on the lesbian and sodomite issues.

How well they mesh with the Islamo-fascists,Marxists,Narco Terrorists,Pedophiles,Pornographers,and Third Way-Fourth Reich enemies of the Republic of our Founding Fathers.

imo

67 posted on 01/06/2006 6:57:25 PM PST by joesnuffy (A camel once bit our sister.. but we knew what to do.. we gathered rocks and squashed her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

Bingo!


68 posted on 01/06/2006 6:57:46 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: lizol; EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Do you see it coming? I saw it coming in the late 80s. CPS knocks at your door - grabs your kids - you aren't fit to have custody. Why? You told them that homosexuality was abnormal, unnatural and immoral. You're guilty of homophobia or sick with homophoba. Mandatory medical treatment. Gotta take your meds or back to the hospital. They'll allow supervised visits with your children as long as you get treatment.

Meanwhile, homosexuals are foster and adoptive parents.

Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.


69 posted on 01/06/2006 7:23:49 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

Ah yes....and in the end, evil will be called good...and good will be called evil.

Lover your laughing little guy!!!!!!!!


70 posted on 01/06/2006 7:26:15 PM PST by Conservative Goddess (Politiae legibus, non leges politiis, adaptandae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Hmmm....well......I guess I'm culturally redneck. That ought to excuse just about any dang thing.


71 posted on 01/06/2006 7:28:17 PM PST by Conservative Goddess (Politiae legibus, non leges politiis, adaptandae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lizol
Psychiatry at best is an art-form anyway, not a true science. In medicine a person's diagnosis's is based on science and not political or social pressure.. a temperature below or above 98.6 is abnormal and that medical diagnosis won't change because of some lobbyist or special interest group. But, according to this quack, he has decided that gay is normal and those who adamantly disagree have a psychological disorder.. Who's delusional..
72 posted on 01/06/2006 7:32:53 PM PST by SeaBiscuit (God Bless all who defend America and Friends, the rest can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary
"Ooo. Double Plus Ungood Hate Thought. Very bad. "

LOL. Is this like the southern expression, "Really-bad-wrong"?
73 posted on 01/06/2006 7:32:57 PM PST by Conservative Goddess (Politiae legibus, non leges politiis, adaptandae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: lizol
Dunbar is considered an expert on hate crimes and serves as a consultant with the Los Angeles City Police Department, the LA Unified School District and the Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center.

Dunbar is probably also a certifed and mentally unstable pervert.

74 posted on 01/06/2006 7:34:33 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

You nailed it, I see that coming too.. and not too far in the distant future. The world is turning upside down and inside out. God help us.


75 posted on 01/06/2006 7:40:41 PM PST by SeaBiscuit (God Bless all who defend America and Friends, the rest can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: lizol
We could examine the case of Louis Sheldon, chairman of the Traditional Values Coalition. In spite of all his rantings about gays, Sheldon has a vast collection of homosexual pornography. Why does Sheldon have the collection? Does he get his jollies, looking at it?

Underneath it all, Sheldon may be as 'queer as a three dollar bill'.

Sheldon also has some peculiarities of his behavior. Like his campaigning against allowing the reimportation of prescription medicines from Canada. It turns out Sheldon had sold out to the drug manufacturers and duped his followers into acting as unwitting lobbyists for the drug companies. The House Conservative Caucus barred Sheldon from their meetings, because of that little escapade. Sheldon is nothing better than a con man, a common grifter.

Values for Sale 1

Values for Sale 2

Values for Sale 2

76 posted on 01/06/2006 7:56:39 PM PST by punster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol
The beginning of the world of 1984...

How about we just classify everyone as having a delusional disorder (do I really need the /sarc here, folks?)

In all seriousness, it seems this guy sounds like a real Nutt-Case himself. After all, what is it they say about people and glass houses?

77 posted on 01/06/2006 8:03:25 PM PST by rzeznikj at stout (This is a darkroom. Keep the door closed or you'll let all the dark out...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Goddess
"Is this like the southern expression, "Really-bad-wrong"?"

That's just about it. Only more Orwellian and hence more incomprehensible to brainy liberals. :)

78 posted on 01/06/2006 8:07:59 PM PST by Reactionary (The Liberal Social Order is a Hedonistic Idiocy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: lizol
We could also examine the case of Paul Cameron, who appears to be NARTH's source for most of their claims about gays.

Besides Cameron's reputation as a notorious fraud, there is this interview (March 18, 1999( of Cameron by Rolling Stone Magazine, where Cameron says:

"If you isolate sexuality as something solely for one's own personal amusement, and all you want is the most satisfying orgasm you can get - and that is what hosexuality seems to be - then homosexuality seems too powerful to resist. The evidence is that men do a better job on men, and women on women, if all you are looking for is orgasm....It's almost like pure heroin. It's such a rush...."

It does appear that Cameron is totally obsessed with having sex with another man. Does this mean that Cameron is also as 'queer as a three dollar bill'? If so, it means that Cameron is in a deep state of denial about his own sexuality, attacking gays as a means of convincing himself he is not gay.

That sounds like pathological behavior.

79 posted on 01/06/2006 8:09:16 PM PST by punster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #80 Removed by Moderator

To: punster

Howdy, punster. Trotting out your favorite cherry-picked quotes, eh?

How's the gay agenda these days?


81 posted on 01/06/2006 8:24:18 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: punster

What a novel idea! Accuse those who criticize the "gay" agenda by saying THEY'RE REALLY HOMOSEXUALS THEMSELVES!

Great idea, that'll shut up the homophobes!

What a great mind you have, thinking that one up. I stand in awe.


82 posted on 01/06/2006 8:26:57 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: punster

"That sounds like pathological behavior."

That bit of ill-logic is pathetic and plain stupid. If I am adamantly and openly against murder does that make me a closet murderer and pathological?


83 posted on 01/06/2006 8:40:00 PM PST by SeaBiscuit (God Bless all who defend America and Friends, the rest can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: punster
Besides Cameron's reputation as a notorious fraud

LOL you keep repeating this 'reputation' thing -its almost like the proverbial high school girl that get a bad 're' because some jerk keeps spreading lies about her...

Where is the meat punster? The 'reputation' and 'notoriety' you wish to repeatedly broadcast in MSM fashion must have some factual basis.

I would find it hard to belief that an FR member not promoting propaganda supporting the homosexual agenda would be spreading such rumors premised only upon the accusations of "notorious" homosexual activists...

84 posted on 01/06/2006 8:45:04 PM PST by DBeers ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: lizol

These are the same people who were sure that people had repressed memories that they didn't, in fact, have.

Me thinks that the delusional problem, it is that people with disturbance have convinced some in society that the disturbance is elsewhere. From this article, they're still working on that.


85 posted on 01/06/2006 8:56:08 PM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldArmy94
You're right, it is very frightening indeed. Because there is no oversight, no system of checks and balances, just a vote by the "APA" and these days, they are a bunch of psychologically impaired homosexuals themselves. The ones that are not, look at any and all disorders that invent, just another money making venture! More meds, more patients to administer those meds too, more appointments with these "patients" in order to monitor the meds. In their minds, it's a one way entrance into their offices, and this is one of the main problems with health care.

There is no one who says to the APA, that it's junk science, that they are a bunch of quacks, there just isn't.
86 posted on 01/06/2006 8:58:36 PM PST by gidget7 (Get GLSEN out of our schools!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: lizol
In early December 2005, Washington Post writer Shankar Vedantam reported on the efforts of UCLA psychology professor Edward Dunbar to encourage the psychiatric community to add "extreme bias" against homosexuals (or ethnic groups) added to the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).

I'm curious how one determines that another person is extremely biased against homosexuals or ethnic groups. If a person lives in an all-black neighborhood and attends a black college is he presumptively biased against whites and Hispanics? How does he prove the presumption false? Or would the presumption only apply to white people who live in predominantly white neighborhoods? If so that is evidence of how biased this exercise really is.

Next question: Is holding politically incorrect viewpoints really proof of bias? I submit it is more likely to be just the opposite: evidence of objectivity. A person who does not kowtow to the party line is not necessarily a biased ideologue. He may just be the most objective person around, someone who rejects PC BS and bases his opinions on real evidence rather than simply parrot what is expected of him.

87 posted on 01/06/2006 8:59:29 PM PST by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Yes, but, given that quote ("We treat racism and homophobia as delusional disorders")...the ISSUE of actual mental wellbeing, or lack thereof, is as to those who believe they are empowered to make those evaluations (who is displaying "homophobia" and who is displaying "racism").

And, how either/both of those is represented by what.

It's actually, as in, in reality, delusional that these two tags are so easily applied by emotionally disturbed people about others who make other choices. Among other things...


88 posted on 01/06/2006 9:04:06 PM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit

WOW touche'!!!!! Couldn't have said that better myself!!


89 posted on 01/06/2006 9:07:02 PM PST by gidget7 (Get GLSEN out of our schools!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Yeah, agreed. The key point about, for example, the Matthew Shephard murder was that it was committed by murderers. Who were also homosexual. But both those significant points were outright refused in any discussion about Shephard's sad demise.

Murderers murder. The only "hate" element in that particular case (Shephard) was that it was murder that killed Matthew Shephard. Although the murderer was also homosexual (at least the one of the two).

Somehow, that's reduced to the problem of generalized "people" "hating" "homosexuals" but the truth of it was that Shephard, a homosexual, was killed by another homosexual. But it was murder that took his life, and a murderer who took it.

It's still, however, talked up to represent the result by social "homophobia" about homosexuality. Which seems to be the ultimate insult to Shephard himself, in my view.


90 posted on 01/06/2006 9:15:02 PM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: OldArmy94

Exactly. I've written about this before, elsewhere on FR...but the goal of "psychiatry" under socialism is to prove "unwell, diseased" anyone or any perspective that does not replicate the social meme. It happened in the Soviet Union, it's happened in Cuba under Castro, it's likely to be happening in South America given Castro's commisserations with Chavez in militarized "health care" (military personnel functioning as "physicians" on "aid" missions among other countries, which Castro prides himself in fostering).

The goal of socialized medicine, unfortunately, eventually seeks to "prescribe socialism" by way of wellness or lack thereof.

Yet another reason to revile Hillary, Howard, Kerry and Kennedy.


91 posted on 01/06/2006 9:21:48 PM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: lizol
Professor Dunbar is considered an expert on hate crimes...as a psychologist and "expert" on hate crimes, the prof should be familiar with a study highlighted on Dr. Drew Pinsky's cable show on sexuality a few months back - done I believe at some university in Georgia, the study involved PET scans of the brains of young male and female subjects exposed to sexually explicit photos - females' scans exhibited the anticipated attention and excitation with male photos, and signs of attention with female photos - male scans showed attention and excitation with female photos, and attention with the male photos. However, they also exhibited with the male photos signs of arousal in a section of the amygdala (sp?), which activity is usually interpreted as indications of reaction to perceived threats - even Pinsky, who considered himself a non-homophobe, exhibited this reaction to the provocative male photos.....

Wouldn't it be something if "homophobia" were hardwired into the male brain as some sort of a survival mechanism through evolution and was therefore as blameless and shameless as, oh, say homosexuality as an expression of genetics is assumed to be......

92 posted on 01/06/2006 9:24:12 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit

There is great difference in clinical practice and educational foundation between "psychologists" and "psychiatrists." Just to make that point here.

However, I have encountered some truly nutty among both fields, and I reserve those adjectives ("truly nutty") for the most egregiously disturbed.

A psychiatrist in CA (medical degree and license) who had been institutionalized for paranoid schizophrenia but had managed to keep that quiet inorder to maintain his license. It wasn't so much the license that was the disturbance but that the guy WAS, in fact, a paranoid schizophrenic who was making determinations about other vulnerable persons.

As to psychologists, I've heard worse.

I agree that it appears to be a case of the most disturbed among us humans who seeks out the field of, especially, psychology (a social science). Psychiatry, at least, requires a more profound education and clinical expertise.


93 posted on 01/06/2006 9:31:56 PM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: punster

There's a lot to be said about homosexuals who victimize other homosexuals but few homosexuals are willing to admit that that occurs. When and if they do, however, inevitably it's blamed on heterosexuals' "homophobia" somehow "forcing" homosexuals to go violent upon one another. Or dishonest otherwise, as you describe.


94 posted on 01/06/2006 9:34:24 PM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

I now regret responding...

my bad.


~;-]


95 posted on 01/06/2006 9:35:53 PM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: MillerCreek

Yes, I know the difference between Psychologists and Psychiatrists, the latter does have medical training, never the less they will defer to their major and not their minor when diagnosing and it's still my opinion that their major is a hyped version of Sociology.


96 posted on 01/06/2006 9:36:59 PM PST by SeaBiscuit (God Bless all who defend America and Friends, the rest can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: lizol

I wonder if they can add "Spends too much time on FreeRepublic" to the list while they're at it.

I can file for psychological counselling and maybe disability compensation!


97 posted on 01/06/2006 9:38:23 PM PST by airborne (If being a Christian was a crime, would there be enough evidence to convict you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit

I wasn't directing that comment specifically to you, just including it in the discussion in general. Something you wrote earlier brought that to mind.

I agree that the entire "mental health" studies, including psychiatry, is largely a delivery of Sociology: what is "normal" and "abnormal" is only thus based upon social acceptability and/or responses by a mean. The "mean" study is to be questioned more often than it is, however.


98 posted on 01/06/2006 9:44:44 PM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit

And, the economics of health care have to be considered here because certain "conditions" only become so when there's funding available to provide a clinical response. Or a chemical one.

Some of that is a good outcome of free enterprise but inevitably, once health care becomes publicly funded, it's at the mercy of the politically motivated and that's usually the most emphatically pursued by people with the most offensive (or extreme) behaviors in search of "acceptance."

I also agree with something earlier written here to suggest that the heterosexual rejection of many aspects of homosexuality is almost certainly biologically motivated. Most of who and what we are as humans is.

However, the biological imperative to reproduce is secondary only to that of survival and homosexuality poses a distraction -- if not a destructive use of resources on a survivalist level (you're a tribe with limited resources and the one or few individuals in that tribe who are not reproducing are not contributing, on a very primal level, and, worse, they are using resources that reproduction would otherwise have available, so, there's got to be some sort of motivation to "avoid" if not admonish people who pose those problems, however subtle).

Worth considering. At this point, it seems that homosexuality is more tolerated within some correlation to the population: the larger it becomes, the more "tolerated" are behaviors that would otherwise be completely rejected by most.


99 posted on 01/06/2006 9:51:55 PM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: lizol
Next, liberal psychologists will decide that if you're a conservative, you're a nut. Although liberals are unhinged, to the Left, that doesn't qualify as a mental disorder. Welcome to the World of 1984 Redux. Big Brother Is Watching You.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

100 posted on 01/06/2006 9:54:49 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson