Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

We need to throw these commies in jail and then forget about the key for the next fifty years...
1 posted on 01/08/2006 7:35:24 AM PST by dbostan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: dbostan

No way! I find their extremism very useful as an example.


2 posted on 01/08/2006 7:37:57 AM PST by Pox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbostan

Two more and we can send them to Cuba to play baseball.


3 posted on 01/08/2006 7:38:48 AM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbostan
This is nothing more than an attempt at revenge for impeaching Clinton.
4 posted on 01/08/2006 7:39:23 AM PST by wolfpat (Dum vivimus, vivamus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbostan
The bill, first proposed by Rep. John Conyers last month, claims that there is "at least a prima facie case that these actions" violated federal law. According to the Atlanta Progressive News, HR635 has attracted the support of seven co-sponsors so far, including Rep. Lois Capps (D-CA), Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX), Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Rep. Donald Payne (D-NJ), Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY), Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA), and Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-CA).

The same cast of characters....or usual suspects as I prefer to call them...

5 posted on 01/08/2006 7:39:33 AM PST by mystery-ak (End Freepathons, become a monthly donor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbostan
How did "Snake Eyes" (Cynthis McKinney) miss getting in on this one?


6 posted on 01/08/2006 7:41:24 AM PST by capt. norm (Politicians are like diapers. They both need changing regularly and for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbostan

It is the same group of people who stir up all the sh!t all the time. This should be of no surprise to anyone on this site.


7 posted on 01/08/2006 7:44:12 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbostan
BRING IT ON!

Then maybe we can put this Bush "lied" hysteria to bed. I'm sick of it.

8 posted on 01/08/2006 7:44:51 AM PST by manwiththehands (Repeal the 17th Amendment. Now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbostan

Maybe it is time for a MURFA type vote in the House. Let's see the demoncrats go on the record.


10 posted on 01/08/2006 7:45:46 AM PST by stormannorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbostan

Are they saying they're ready for President Cheney? Go for it, sheepdips!


11 posted on 01/08/2006 7:47:55 AM PST by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbostan

We need to throw these commies in jail and then forget about the key for the next fifty years...""

You forgot a digit: 500 years.


14 posted on 01/08/2006 7:53:20 AM PST by ridesthemiles (ridesthemiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbostan
HR 635

Conyers and seven co-sponsors? Well, it's cheaper than a full page ad in the NYT.

"Sure, Congressman, you can put anything you want in a resolution. Good luck getting it on the agenda."

17 posted on 01/08/2006 8:15:24 AM PST by siunevada (If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbostan

Which brings up he question, what if the RATS take over the house and Senate in 2006? I don't think it will happen, but worst case scenario, what if? You know they'll try to impeach the President. What should we do about it?


18 posted on 01/08/2006 8:15:48 AM PST by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbostan

Three of those seven are members of Communism Lite - literally. Waters & Woolsey (D [CA]), and Payne (D [N.J.]) are members of the Democratic Socialists of America.

Hang 'em after a trial for treason.


19 posted on 01/08/2006 8:16:23 AM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbostan

I could have predicted most of the people on the list without even reading the story.


20 posted on 01/08/2006 8:18:43 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbostan

Will it ever occur to this group that there are a few million people living between New York and California that don't give a crap what they think?


25 posted on 01/08/2006 8:44:17 AM PST by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbostan

Its a damned shame DDT has been banned.


26 posted on 01/08/2006 8:44:36 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Don't buy Bose. Their warranty is no good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbostan
Impeachment inquiry? The libwacks should just go completely off the deep end and introduce an actual impeachment resolution on the House floor.

Not like it hasn't been tried before...

PRESIDENTS WHO HAD IMPEACHMENT RESOLUTIONS INTRODUCED AGAINST THEM IN CONGRESS:
John Tyler ("upsurging presidential powers")
Andrew Johnson (violation of Tenure of Office Act)
Grover Cleveland (acting against the public decency)
Hebert Hoover ("extreme neglect of duties and incompetance in office")
Harry Truman (Communist subversion in government)
Richard Nixon (Watergate)
Ronald Reagan (Iran-Contra)
Bill Clinton (perjury, obstruction of justice, and abuse of power)

PRESIDENTS'S WHOSE IMPEACHMENT RESOLUTIONS WERE ACTUALLY APPROVED BY THE JUDICIARY FOR A VOTE INSTEAD OF LAUGHED AT:
Andrew Johnson
Richard Nixon
Bill Clinton

PRESIDENTS WHO WERE ACTUALLY IMPEACHED BY THE FULL HOUSE:
Andrew Johnson
Bill Clinton

PRESIDENTS WHO WERE CONVICTED AFTER IMPEACHMENT AND REMOVED FROM OFFICE:
None

BTW, since the libwacks now think "lying" about Iraq's "weapons of mass destruction" is "impeachable", does this mean they think Clinton should have been re-impeached after he decided to bomb Iraq to stop "weapons of mass destruction" during his FIRST impeachment?

27 posted on 01/08/2006 8:45:01 AM PST by BillyBoy (Find out the TRUTH about the Chicago Democrat Machine's "Best Friend" in the GOP... www.nolahood.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbostan
Figures:

4 - from CA
1 - from NY
1 - from NJ
1 - from TX

RAT, RAT, RAT, RAT, RAT, RAT, and RAT. TX has their problem in certain area, but RAT land CA, NY, and NJ. But NY after they let Clintoon destroy the Military Intelligence and the CIA and then 9/11. Wow, talk about brain dead.
28 posted on 01/08/2006 8:49:34 AM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbostan

How about some of those rats that won with 55 or less joining in? Hee hee hee.


29 posted on 01/08/2006 9:03:11 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (We will never murtha to the terrorists. Bring home the troops means bring home the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dbostan

So lets see...It was Republicans that killed the impeachment against Clinton even though they had the power to carry it through.

And, if it ever comes to it, it will be Republicans that made it possible to happen, even though without them it would never have gotten off the ground.

The question is, why would the Dems start something they know they do not have the power to carry through?

This life long Republican is a whole lot less Republican than I used to be.


30 posted on 01/08/2006 9:06:50 AM PST by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson