Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA cracks down on leaks
Herald Sun ^ | 9 January 2006

Posted on 01/08/2006 2:10:07 PM PST by Aussie Dasher

CIA director Porter Goss is redoubling efforts to prevent agents from divulging the spy agency's secrets to the media, and also plans to clamp down on former spies publishing books about their covert careers, Time magazine has reported.

Citing an anonymous former senior Central Intelligence Agency official, Time, in a report to hit newsstands this week, said on its website that CIA officials told employees during a meeting last week that leaking had gotten out of control and needed to stop.

The reported added that a new clampdown on leakers had been launched, supported by a team of "mostly retired" agents contracted to scan the news media for possible leaks of classified material and to try to find the leakers responsible.

The internal crackdown follows recent media reports about the CIA's secret prison network for terror suspects and last month's disclosure in The New York Times that US President George W Bush authorised the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on the telephone calls of some Americans without court warrants.

The report said Goss also is worried about the potential impact of the leaks and insider books on the agency's security and clandestine operations.

"You don't want people who sit down with an (intelligence) officer in confidence to be concerned it will end up in the guy's memoirs in a year or two," one anonymous intelligence official told Time.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cia; cialeaks; leaks; looselips; patriotleak; portergoss; spying
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
Leaks within the CIA are treason. Those found guilty of leaking should be charged as such.
1 posted on 01/08/2006 2:10:10 PM PST by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

It's about time the CIA got serious about this. Time to clean house.


2 posted on 01/08/2006 2:11:33 PM PST by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Leaks within the CIA are treason. Those found guilty of leaking should be charged as such.

And not only charged as such ...

3 posted on 01/08/2006 2:11:40 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909

All the released information is to be cleared, with the clearing executive made personally responsible.


4 posted on 01/08/2006 2:14:23 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

Arrest and isolate them for as long as the law provides, then send them to GITMO>


5 posted on 01/08/2006 2:14:40 PM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
The reported added that a new clampdown on leakers had been launched, supported by a team of "mostly retired" agents contracted to scan the news media for possible leaks of classified material and to try to find the leakers responsible.

Sounds like the administration needs to place a "mole" inside the CIA.

6 posted on 01/08/2006 2:15:21 PM PST by oldbrowser (No matter how cynical I get, I can't seem to keep up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

What's the penalty on this sort of thing, life in federal prison?


7 posted on 01/08/2006 2:16:52 PM PST by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

I agree totally. They need to be either sent to one of those "secret prisons" or have an "accident". It IS treason and ought to be treated as such. I'd say take them to court, but there is no court in the land where these things can be discussed without further "leaks".


8 posted on 01/08/2006 2:18:33 PM PST by McGavin999 (If Intelligence Agencies can't find leakers, how can we expect them to find terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

I guess they'll be going after Val Flame since she confessed her job to her boyfriend during post coital spooning?
Maybe they'll arrest Joe Wilson for divulging his mission?


9 posted on 01/08/2006 2:20:21 PM PST by newnhdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Citing an anonymous former senior Central Intelligence Agency official

Do I understand this correctly? This story about a clampdown in leaks is, itself, based on a leak?
10 posted on 01/08/2006 2:29:14 PM PST by babyface00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babyface00

That pretty much sums it up. Fair bit of work to be done...


11 posted on 01/08/2006 2:31:52 PM PST by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Sissy Hair loses his cool.


12 posted on 01/08/2006 2:38:15 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat

OOPS, wrong thread!


13 posted on 01/08/2006 2:38:40 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad

"Maybe they'll arrest Joe Wilson for divulging his mission?"
The Soviets had female agents called "Swallows." She's probably the CIA equivalent! (sp? Ever since my first computer, my spelling ability has gone down)


14 posted on 01/08/2006 2:46:44 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

I notice that even this article has no -- zer, sip -- mention of the certain consequences for violating the secrecy oath.


15 posted on 01/08/2006 2:53:42 PM PST by Publius6961 (The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad
I guess they'll be going after Val Flame since she confessed her job to her boyfriend during post coital spooning?

IIRC, it was before, not after. She was giving him fair warning.

16 posted on 01/08/2006 2:56:54 PM PST by JoeFromSidney (My book is out. Read excerpts at www.thejusticecooperative.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909
It's about time the CIA got serious about this. Time to clean house.

It's about time all of us get serious and see the forest for the trees and clamp down on the politicians and their biased rhetoric which brought this issue to prominence in the first place.

17 posted on 01/08/2006 3:03:07 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Shaking a stick at a lion.

Won't stop until they are stopped with severe repercussions.


18 posted on 01/08/2006 3:05:18 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (Democrats value the privacy of terrorists higher than the lives of Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Nothing like closing the barn door after the horse has run off Porter.


19 posted on 01/08/2006 3:12:58 PM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
.....Citing an anonymous former senior Central Intelligence Agency official.............

Keyboard cleanup!, Aisle 13...

20 posted on 01/08/2006 3:16:25 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights (GOP, The Other France)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson