Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Desktop fusion is back on the table
Nature Magazine ^ | 10 January 2005 | Mark Peplow

Posted on 01/10/2006 6:15:20 PM PST by PatrickHenry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: PatrickHenry; Physicist

In order to be more popular they nowadays print many strange things both in Nature and in New Scientist. The latter wrote "Take a leap into hyperspace" http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/mg18925331.200 with high crackpot index scores. It is sad that just a few days after the Physics year these things are published.


41 posted on 01/11/2006 5:51:09 AM PST by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Something about the people that painted the radium on there.

Yeah, Something about, how much Lucky/Fun/Profitable it was to work @ the plant, painting the watch dial for 5$ (L1920s/E1930s Great pay!) a day.

..."You tip the paint brush in your mouth."
Radium Paint....YIKES...the pic. were horrible/gross.

42 posted on 01/11/2006 5:56:30 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker
No one questions that the collapsing bubbles can (somehow) generate the temperatures for fusion. I'm not sure why; I merely note that such is not the dispute. People are having trouble replicating the claimed results and some people were surprised at being left out of the review process.

But, as despite the title, this isn't really "cold fusion." It's hot fusion in little collapsing bubbles.

43 posted on 01/11/2006 6:09:47 AM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
But, as despite the title, this isn't really "cold fusion.

Maybe I am missing the point here. A science article is going to be published in a supposedly reputable journal, it cannot be replicated, there is a selective peer review, it is hot fusion and not cold fusion as the title suggests, and this is not a problem? I guess my research experience and striving for integrity in publications does not apply in this field. (Not trying to be sarcastic. LOL!)

44 posted on 01/11/2006 6:21:23 AM PST by phantomworker ("Compared to what we ought to be, we are only half awake..." --William James)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Desktop fusion is back on the table

Shouldn't it be back on the desktop?

45 posted on 01/11/2006 6:30:36 AM PST by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker
Why is it not being "cold fusion" a problem? The article's title actually says "desktop fusion," not "cold fusion" anyway.

There is skepticism of Taleyarkhan's results, yes. People who have expressed same regarding earlier Taleyarkhan studies were disappointed at not being in the peer review process this time, yes.

46 posted on 01/11/2006 6:44:46 AM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith
You can't compare the two. Sonofusion is not crackpottery, and Nature is not to be faulted for writing about it. (It may or may not be real; that's another question.) New Scientist has always promoted crackpottery.
47 posted on 01/11/2006 6:46:45 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Physicist

OK, you are right.


48 posted on 01/11/2006 6:56:24 AM PST by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; printhead
They used to make wristwatches with radium dials. Glow in the dark all night. The watches weren't particularly dangerous, but they aren't available generally anymore. Something about the people that painted the radium on there.

The folks (young women, mostly) who painted the watch dials used fine foxhair brushes and, to 'sharpen' the brush tip, would lick it - similar to a seamstress licking the end of a thread before attempting to insert it through a needle's eye.

Over time that constant touching of the tongue with a radium-laden brush led to cancers of the tongue, mouth and jaw. This was the first indication that radiation exposure could cause cancer.

49 posted on 01/11/2006 9:36:10 AM PST by IonImplantGuru (Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: punster; PatrickHenry
Some simple fusion concepts are here.

They probably ran out of money before they could get their hands on some tritium.

50 posted on 01/11/2006 11:10:52 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
It's already been invented...I've seen it!


51 posted on 01/11/2006 11:12:27 AM PST by RockinRight (The Republicans Suck Less than the Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

Damn! You beat me to it!


52 posted on 01/11/2006 11:12:48 AM PST by RockinRight (The Republicans Suck Less than the Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: IonImplantGuru; RightWhale
The folks who painted the watch dials used fine foxhair brushes and, to 'sharpen' the brush tip, would lick it...This was the first indication that radiation exposure could cause cancer.Thats, what I remembered.
53 posted on 01/11/2006 4:28:57 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; blam
Something about the people that painted the radium on there.

Yes, the girls/women that painted the dials had the bad habit of wetting the tip of thier paint brushes with their tongues to get that fine point to the bristles..
They ingested copious amounts of radium in the process..
Radium poisoning was the result.. The symptoms were very similar to advanced / accelerated aging.. ( or possibly blood poisoning.. They looked really bad.. tubercular..)

On another line about radium, I recall that after one of the plants had been torn down, and was being leveled, bulldozer operators refused to work the site.. ( This was North Carolina, South Carolina, not sure.. )
It seems that radium dust had mixed with the sandy soil of the site, sand that contained titanium..
The pressure of the bulldozers would create an electrical discharge, and the dozer operators would recieve severe shocks, sometimes experiencing small lightning bolts crackling in the air around them..
Occassionally, heavy impacts of the dozer blades would result in the soil exploding..

I have no idea where I read this story, I have searched for the source for years.. more than a decade.. without success..
But the story has stuck in my mind..
It may be an "urban legend", I don't know..

54 posted on 01/11/2006 9:09:29 PM PST by Drammach (Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Drammach
When I was in the Navy, I heard stories about sailors making bracelets, belt buckles and etc out of the radium patches that were placed on/around the ship hatches/doors in WW2 so that they could be seen during black-out periods.

Some pretty scary stories about the end results to the affected sailors.

55 posted on 01/11/2006 9:18:40 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson