Posted on 01/12/2006 6:30:57 PM PST by TWohlford
Study urges repeal of Canada's polygamy law Jan. 12, 2006. 04:59 PM CANADIAN PRESS
OTTAWA — A new study for the federal Justice Department says Canada should get rid of its law banning polygamy, and change other legislation to help women and children living in such multiple-spouse relationships.
"Criminalization does not address the harms associated with valid foreign polygamous marriages and plural unions, in particular the harms to women," says the report, obtained by The Canadian Press under the Access to Information Act.
"The report therefore recommends that this provision be repealed."
The research paper is part of a controversial $150,000 polygamy project, launched a year ago and paid for by the Justice Department and Status of Women Canada.
The paper by three law professors at Queen's University in Kingston argues that Sec. 293 of the Criminal Code banning polygamy serves no useful purpose and in any case is rarely prosecuted.
Instead, Canadian laws should be changed to better accommodate the problems of women in polygamous marriages, providing them clearer spousal support and inheritance rights.
Currently, there's a hodgepodge of legislation across the provinces, some of whom — Ontario, for example — give limited recognition to foreign polygamous marriages for the purposes of spousal support. Some jurisdictions provide no relief at all.
Chief author Martha Bailey says criminalizing polygamy, typically a marriage involving one man and several wives, serves no good purpose and prosecutions could do damage to the women and children in such relationships.
"Why criminalize the behaviour?" she said in an interview. "We don't criminalize adultery.
"In light of the fact that we have a fairly permissive society . . . why are we singling out that particular form of behaviour for criminalization?"
Instead, there are other laws available to deal with problems often associated with polygamous unions, which are not legally recognized as marriages in Canada.
"If there are problems such as child abuse, or spousal abuse, there are other criminal provisions or other laws dealing with those problems that certainly should be enforced," Bailey said.
The Justice Department project was prompted in part by an RCMP investigation into the religious community of Bountiful in Creston, B.C., where polygamy is practised openly.
The British Columbia government has long been considering whether to lay charges under Section 293.
But the project was also intended to provide the Liberal government with ammunition to help defend its same-sex marriage bill last spring.
Opponents claimed the bill, now law, was a slippery slope that would open the door to polygamy and even bestiality.
Another report for the project, also led by two Queen's University professors, dismisses the slippery-slope argument, saying that allowing same-sex marriages promotes equality while polygamous marriages are generally harmful to women's interests and would therefore promote inequality.
Liberal Justice Minister Irwin Cotler said he has seen only a summary of the research reports, but already rejects lifting the criminal ban on polygamy.
"At this point, the practice of polygamy, bigamy and incest are criminal offences in Canada and will continue to be," he said from Montreal.
"These reports will become part of the knowledge base on this issue and will be taken into account."
The Bailey report, consistent with other research for the project, also concludes the courts might well rule that Canada's law banning polygamy is a violation of Canada's constitutional guarantee of freedom of religion.
But Section 293 would survive such a challenge because the harm to women and children in many polygamous marriages is well documented — abuse, poverty, coercion, health problems — and the limit to religious freedom would be considered "reasonable," as allowed under Section 1 of the charter.
Although the Bountiful case raises immediate issues, Canada is also faced with a rising tide of immigration from Africa and the Middle East, where polygamy is legally and religiously sanctioned. Immigration officers can refuse entry to individuals practising polygamy.
Bailey said Canada should nevertheless offer some recognition to polygamous marriages that are legally valid in foreign countries to help protect women's rights here.
Another paper for the project, by the Alberta Civil Liberties Research Centre, urges British Columbia to proceed immediately with a prosecution in Bountiful.
"Based on the harms associated with polygamy as it is practised in Bountiful, there do not appear to be any alternatives to prosecution, however difficult it may be."
Didn't Jesus observe that "a man cannot serve 2 masters"?
The Liberals are truly the "stupid party" in Canada.
This is just another way to appease the Muslims. The Canadians are good at one thing: being able to continously make me dislike them.
What are they smoking up there?
No, this is the designed plan to create a legal way to create many, many more Muslims within Western Countries, esp the USA.
One domino at a time.
If this doesn't bring about a conservative landslide, nothing will.
and all of the Muslim wives and off spring will be living off the Canadian dole.
You got a tractor??? What kind?? I have 2 Farmalls and an Oliver. And that's just the big ones!
";^)
Who wants multiple wives? I have enough trouble trying to handle one!
It's not about moslems.
"The Justice Department project was prompted in part by an RCMP investigation into the religious community of Bountiful in Creston, B.C., where polygamy is practised openly.
The British Columbia government has long been considering whether to lay charges under Section 293. "
The Bountiful community is a breakaway Mormon sect that is for all intents and purposes a cross border sex slave ring.
Past Your Eyes,
I grew up on an Oliver Super 55. Hated every minute of it then, but now it wasn't so bad.
Here's the story of these people:
http://www.rickross.com/reference/polygamy/polygamy288.html
The democrats have no concept of damage control when things are going badly for them.
If they were the captain of the titanic, they would just keep reversing the ship and re-ramming the iceberg.
"Didn't Jesus observe that "a man cannot serve 2 masters"?"
And neither can a man serve two mothers in law.
Having said that, if a man can afford both wives and the children without needing government money, an argument can be made that a father present in the house with the children is better than a part time or absent father.
The issue gets ugly when young teenage boys are kicked out of their homes, to live on the streets. This is to prevent them from competing with the older men for the young girls in their community. I thought they were harmless folks with a kinda funny way to live, till I heard the news about how they kick out the boys.
knew this was coming soon.
Yep. The appearance of this was predictable, and if I'm not mistaken, right on schedule...
the infowarrior
Sort of like boot camp. By the time it was over we were laughing about all the things that had given us such grief in the early part. I grew up on a Farmall Super C. Now I have a '41 A, a '48 M and a '62 Oliver 550 (same as a Super 55 except newer). But the Oliver isn't running. Yet.
If this doesn't encourage Canadians to vote Conservative, nothing will. However, it is hard to see Ontario adjusting to a Conservative government.
When you are right, you are right. Unquestionably, 'tis better a house without a father than no house at all.
This proposal won't pass because when they are sober enough to think about it, it means polygamists from the fundamentalist Mormon sects (such as the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints) must likewise be legalized. When you allow them legal status we will see these groups move to Canada en masse.
And everyone know Mormons are most politically conservative of almost every group in the US (the more mainstream Mormon church has its members mainly in Utah. In the 2004 US presidential election, Bush got more than 70% of votes in Utah as a whole). If each and every one of the 37,000 move north to Canada and each "family" has 25+ children, it will mean BC instantaneously goes Conservative and it won't take more than 40 years for even Toronto to turn Red had they decided to resettle in GTA. This will probably send shivers down every Canadian "moderates"/msinstreamers/leftists' spine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.