Skip to comments.
Here Come the Brides, Plural marriage is waiting in the wings
Weekly Standard ^
| 12/26/2005
| Stanley Kurtz
Posted on 01/14/2006 6:29:05 AM PST by A. Pole
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: ken5050
More grist for the Islamofascists..geee..ya think maybe they do have a point after all?.. ( just kidding)More grist for athiests, Muslims, Hindus and other Christians who see the disappearance of Christian values. This is pure MORAL RELATIVITY, called "tolerance" by the Dutch who see all this as good, tradition Dutch tolerance and freedom of expression--both VERY dear to them.
They are paying the price. It's too late for them to close the barn door. Horses have run away.
They've got what they wanted. Now they have to eat it. Poor Holland.
21
posted on
01/14/2006 6:53:05 AM PST
by
starfish923
(Socrates: It's never right to do wrong.)
To: A. Pole
"Non-Indonesian Dutch" is a great term! NIDNID, I LIKE the sound of that....pithy, clear and P.C. and funny. :o) Very Dutch I think.
22
posted on
01/14/2006 6:54:56 AM PST
by
starfish923
(Socrates: It's never right to do wrong.)
To: starfish923
How to make a tagline out of it?
23
posted on
01/14/2006 7:00:02 AM PST
by
A. Pole
(NID: "Non-Indonesian Dutch")
To: A. Pole
To: starfish923
I'm not sure that polygamy will be the first problem that comes from legal queer marriage in this country.
I think their next step will be father/son, mother/daughter marriage.
What basis would their be to stop them if queer marriage is made legal?
They couldn't produce children so the recessive gene argument would go out the window.
Queer marriage has opened Pandora's box and if it isn't stopped soon I don't know where it will end.
25
posted on
01/14/2006 7:36:44 AM PST
by
Beagle8U
(An "Earth First" kinda guy ( when we finish logging here, we'll start on the other planets.)
To: starfish923
Look, if the Dutch-Indonesians were doing the emigrating folks in the recipient states would have half a chance. After all, those guys believe in good, old-fashioned polygamy ~ with none of this funny stuff with the guys.
The problem is, if the Indo-European Dutch are emigrating, they are bringing their sick attitudes with them, and they will undoubtedly demand the rest of us accept their strange beliefs concerning marriage and family life.
It's time to re-instate the quota system and cut off the Dutch quota.
26
posted on
01/14/2006 7:39:05 AM PST
by
muawiyah
(-)
To: television is just wrong
Well, when the menfolk finally figure out that what's good for the goose is good for the gander, I don't they'll be in such a rush to approve this.
I've polled a few guys. And while they all get a chuckle out of the prospect of polygamy, polyandry doesn't sit too well with them. Gee, wonder why? :)
27
posted on
01/14/2006 7:42:56 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: mewzilla
For what the 50's were, and they were better than a lot of other times in history, we all have to admit, that a two parent family with a father and mother is really the best it can be.
What is happening right now, is wrong. It is self fulfilling without regard to children and their well being. I shudder to think of what the future brings.
To: A. Pole
Legalized polygamy will drastically increase the Muslim population of Holland and any other country foolish enough to try it. Polygamy is the main reason women are virtual slaves in Muslim countries, and soon this slavery will extend to Europe. How many Muslims are in the Netherlands? How many bisexuals? The bisexuals will use polygamy as nothing more than recreational sex, while the Muslims, who already produce many children, will double their production of children. These children will mostly be dependent on a strained welfare system. Sooner or later this system will collapse and the Muslims will take over. Then they will have their Sharia and they will kill the homosexuals, bisexuals, Unitarians, Christians, anyone who can read, etc.
29
posted on
01/14/2006 8:14:12 AM PST
by
Wilhelm Tell
(True or False? This is not a tag line.)
To: mewzilla
I've polled a few guys. And while they all get a chuckle out of the prospect of polygamy, polyandry doesn't sit too well with them. Gee, wonder why? :)Because it's a logical impossibility for a household to have two heads?
30
posted on
01/14/2006 8:43:58 AM PST
by
Shalom Israel
(Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.)
To: martin_fierro
The two brides really look similar in this picture.
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
"Admitedly, I have not read every word of this but wouldn't this eventually bring about the end of employers providing benefits for employees, and also an overburdening on the SS system?
How can these broad-minded employers that provide benefits to domestic partners, afford to add multiple partners? "
As in Maryland, the courts will simple order the benefits to be paid.
To: starfish923
As the saying goes:
"He who lays down with the dogs, gets up with the fleas"
33
posted on
01/14/2006 9:24:30 AM PST
by
stm
To: stm
As in Maryland, the courts will simple order the benefits to be paid. Pay benefits to multiple partners? Business can't afford it because if we're going to take this to it's ultimate conclusion, there will be no limit on the number of partners.
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
Kind of like welfare and kids? Need more dough, have more kids.
It's so simple even a caveman could figure it out (Ok, so I stole if from the Geico commercial)
35
posted on
01/14/2006 1:02:41 PM PST
by
stm
To: martin_fierro
36
posted on
01/14/2006 1:11:19 PM PST
by
gridlock
(eliminate perverse incentives)
To: starfish923
This is pure MORAL RELATIVITY, called "tolerance" by the Dutch who see all this as good, tradition Dutch tolerance and freedom of expression--both VERY dear to them.
This is not moral relativity, but TOTAL DEPRAVITY. The Unitarian Universalist Church is one sorry den of inequity.
37
posted on
01/14/2006 1:47:11 PM PST
by
GarySpFc
(De Oppresso Liber)
To: stm
This polygamy issue may be a gift.
To: muawiyah
Look, if the Dutch-Indonesians were doing the emigrating folks in the recipient states would have half a chance. After all, those guys believe in good, old-fashioned polygamy ~ with none of this funny stuff with the guys.
The problem is, if the Indo-European Dutch are emigrating, they are bringing their sick attitudes with them, and they will undoubtedly demand the rest of us accept their strange beliefs concerning marriage and family life.
It's time to re-instate the quota system and cut off the Dutch quota.Having Dutch immigrants is NO problem. There aren't enough of them to make ANY impact whatsoever, expecially in this country.
Lol. Most people hear them and assume that they are Germans. They don't know "van" from "von."
Most people see them and assume that they are Scandinavians if they are blond/blue-eyed and German if they aren't.
They WOULD bring expertise on cheese and land-from-sea/brackish-water reclamation.
Politically they would all be Greenpeacers or leftish Democrats. So that's the down side.
Bonus: they ARE all English speakers, good ones too.
Remember, the ones emigrating from Holland are the ones we would want anyway.....rejecting the garbage that's going on in their home country and all.
39
posted on
01/14/2006 3:01:15 PM PST
by
starfish923
(Socrates: It's never right to do wrong.)
To: GarySpFc
This is not moral relativity, but TOTAL DEPRAVITY. The Unitarian Universalist Church is one sorry den of inequity.Hey, you're preaching to the choir.
I am reiterating what our Holy Father says about dens of inequity. :o)
40
posted on
01/14/2006 3:02:31 PM PST
by
starfish923
(Socrates: It's never right to do wrong.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson