Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A.Hun

Re your #47 - "If you want to worry, worry about their Silkworm surface to ship missiles...."

Agreed; isn't that what took out and nearly sunk a Brit Cruiser during the Faulklands thing?

We might get to see how well our radar-directed minigun anti-missle systems work - if at all... if they remember to even turn them on.

I wonder if the Iranians have the Russian / Chicom "SKVALL" hypercavitating rocket torpedoes? You know, the ones that can travel at nearly the speed of sound underwater?

Range on those things is apparently a little limited, but they sound pretty devistating if they get to ya.

This little mini sub ought to make a light snack for one of our hunter-killer subs in the region, don't you think?


164 posted on 01/15/2006 11:34:16 AM PST by Uncle Jaque (Club Freedom; Dues: Vigilance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Jaque

Yes, the Silkworm was used in the Falklands, and it would be the greatest threat to shipping. It is very large and effective. They are also rumored to have some old soviet cruise missiles.

I understand that those torpedoes are very recent, and I highly doubt Russia would let anyone have one for a while.

This little guy would not rate a hunter/killer. All you need is a couple of Sea Stallions and a handful of sonobouys, and that thing is history.

Being a diesel/electric makes it quiet, but very short range. It's size would limit its underwater time. It would be nothing but a coffin (IMO).


166 posted on 01/15/2006 11:43:34 AM PST by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson