You may deny that all you wish - but you and I know that that conversation took place.
Which makes it a 'he said/he said' situation. Without documentary evidence or further corroboration to cast doubt on Murtha's situation, it doesn't appear there is anything further to pursue in this matter at the present time.
posted on 01/15/2006 4:07:16 PM PST
(Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
Without documentary evidence or further corroboration to cast doubt on Murtha's situation, it doesn't appear there is anything further to pursue in this matter at the present time.
The documentary evidence and corroboration aren't going to just fall out of the sky, like manna from heaven, they will have to be sought. And they should be, without making any further public accusations, but relentlessly pursued they should be.
posted on 01/15/2006 6:53:39 PM PST
by El Gato
(The Second Amendment is the Reset Button of the U.S. Constitution)
He said she said, is not the case. The situation can be corroborated or not by witnesses.
The point is honesty and integrity. Does he possess such qualities? I do recall writing long ago about disagreeing with him but allowing the first amendment allowed him his thoughts on the Marine involvement in the “killing of innocent civilians”. This man not only speaks without thinking but, I believe, he speaks “politicianese” in that do what you must to get reelected, make money for yourself (ABSCAM), and look good to the folks at home.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson