Lemmings headed for the cliff.
Posted on 01/17/2006 12:37:28 PM PST by Caleb1411
Certainly a sophisticated argument, but I remain unconvinced by the pro-abortion people.
I will NEVER understand why people are so obsessed with killing babies to the point they have to go out and demonstrate.
To be a liberal you must abandon all common sense and decency in exchange for selfishness and groupthink.
thanks very much for posting that article
Dude, as long as it gets me out of trouble....
Nah. According to the socialist fanatics on the Left it's a chair. Or a bird. Or something...
Imagine what public opinion in this country might actually be on the issue were there not a left-leaning, pro-abort media lockdown.
Dude, as long as it gets me out of trouble....The problem is women, in the long run, really don't know what they want in the first place...
Lemmings headed for the cliff.
All Roe V. Wade did was force states that didn't want abortion to be legal to accept it anyway. If RVW is overturned, all that will happen is the several states will once again be free to determine whether they want to allow abortion within their borders or not. Does anyone really think that, should RVW be overturned, every blue state in the country won't immediately codify the right to abortion in their constitutions (or at least try to)? With the rabid support these people claim to have, it should be no problem for them to provide rides to pro-abortion states for residents of non-abortion states who want to have it done.
Don't let them fool you. They know. They want your money.
They're about as enamored of Him and His righteous principles as the Pharisees were. He'd be a rather intractable obstacle in their abortion-uber-alles path.
In 2006 there simply can NOT be any woman alive who thinks that SHE is the first human who ever got pregnant with anything OTHER than a human baby! It would make history!
Human mating produces humans- always has, always will.
The lengths people will( and have to) go to convince themselves otherwise only proves how unnatural this mindset is. It's all about semantics now?
Calling it 'tissue' when you abort it doesn't alter the fact that it is a human baby, with a face and arms and legs and fingers lying in a basin.
These women have been too separated from reality. Everyone who chooses to abort their 'fetal tissue' should receive it, and be responsibible for it's disposal. And I say that as a woman of childbearing age- I'd hand out the containers myself!
If it's not a baby, that shouldn't bother or traumatize anyone, should it?
What do women want.
1. Everything!
2. Yesterday!
3. You Lazy Bast@rd!
Mary Lou Greenburg: "It's not a baby until it comes out...that's what birthdays are about."
For the man, "soon dear" means maybe tomorrow, maybe this week, maybe next week, maybe next year. Soon dear.
For the woman it is "now" meaning when are you going to get this done, now, "I want it done now."
The real battle of the sexes is between the meanings of soon and now.
I no longer can eat lunch.
Very good! For the life of me, I cannot comprehend the mindset of these people. With all of the birth control that is so widely available, there shouldn't be any unwanted pregnancies. There's no longer a social stigma attached to women or girls who get pregnant out of wedlock, so that's no excuse. There are thousands of people who want to adopt. And I don't buy it when they say, "Oh I could never give my baby away" but then go and have an abortion.
The fetal pain argument is enough for me to cring everytime I hear "it's just tissue".
That's enough for now....I'm getting myself worked up again!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.