2002 Memo Doubted Uranium Sale Claim (NYT desperate for news. Resorts to rehashing lies.)

New York Times ^ | 1/18/06 | ERIC LICHTBLAU

[MurryMom]

My post in this thread said, "Everything he [Bush]said [about nuclear weapons in his 2003 SOU address] was either outright false or intentionally misleading.

In order to prove that I lied, you must demonstrate that something in the quoted sentence was incorrect. That is, you must demonstrate that Bush gave us correct information about Iraq's mothballed nuclear weapons program in the Bush 2003 SOU address. Because you never identified which Bush statement was correct, your accusation is undecipherable by a person of my limited IQ. Please identify the correct Bush info about nuclear weapons in his 2003 SOU so that readers on this board have a clue.

[Mr. Silverback]

This account has been banned or suspended.

Ooh, I was in before the ZOT! Woohoo! I'll post this here because they always seem to let you come back, like a zombie, only dumber.

In order to prove that I lied, you must demonstrate that something in the quoted sentence was incorrect.

BZZZZZZZTT!! Sorry, you are WRONG! Thanks for playing.

You see, you told a lie, then when I called you a liar, you demanded I prove it by proving something else entirely. Let's go to the tape:

In post 5 you said "The Brits never said they endorsed any of Bush's many fake tidbits in his 2003 SOU address."

Then, in post 6, ravingnutter posted information from the Butler report that showed that the Brits considered the famous sixteen words to be "well-founded."

In post 10, you started tap dancing, trying to turn ravingnutter's "The Brits endorsed the 16 words" into "The 2003 SOTU was infallible." This was you lying to try to weasel out of getting caught flinging male bovine waste products in post 5.

I responded to post 10 in post 37, pointing out that you had been caught in a lie in post 5. But you're still tap dancing, trying to change our assertions into something more to your liking.

Simply stated, post 5 was either a lie or you have so little knowledge of the actual facts that you should not be involved in adult conversations. Enjoy your vacation...

...CHIMPUS KHAN COMMANDS IT!

[Mr. Silverback]

See posts 37,38 and 40-42. I think you'll be amused.

[ravingnutter]

Whoa...hopefully they just suspended her. Geez...if they banned her, it's going to be just like losing an old liberal friend, LOL!

To MurryMom:

You are arguing semantics. The case I made was that the underground bunker that was found was many times the size that you cited it would take to conceal WMD, a UN inspector admitted these were bunkers that were not previously known about and therefore they were not monitored by the UN inspectors and that it was not discovered until long after we invaded. Case closed.

Gonna miss you, gal, LOL!