Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British Doctors Use Euthanasia to Kill Nearly 3,000 Patients
LifeNews ^ | January 17, 2006 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 01/18/2006 7:34:52 AM PST by NYer

London, England (LifeNews.com) -- A new survey finds British doctors used euthanasia to kill nearly 3,000 patients in 2004. The poll also found that British doctors do not want to see the legalization of assisted suicide despite a campaign to do that.

Brunel University surveyed 857 doctors and found that thousands of deaths in 2004 were the result of illegal euthanasia.

According to a BBC report, the survey found that, of the 584,791 deaths in the UK in 2004, 936 were by voluntary euthanasia and 1,930 involved the doctor killing the patient without the patient's consent.

Of the euthanasia deaths, one-third of them were the result of doctors treating the symptoms of a disease or injury and just under a third involved doctors withholding treatment in cases when it is supposedly in the best interest of the patient.

Both of those courses of action are legal in Britain, the BBC reported.

None of the doctors in the poll said they had been involved in an assisted suicide and just 2.6 percent of the physicians surveyed said it would be beneficial to change the law to allow it.

Discussing the report, Professor Clive Seale told the BBC, "Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are understandably very emotive subjects, but this work shows that UK doctors are less willing to take such actions than in several other countries."

In November lawmakers in the House of Lords introduced a private members bill to legalize assisted suicide. Pro-life groups have strenuously fought the bill and were successful in getting a provision allowing voluntary euthanasia to be removed from it.

Groups backing euthanasia said the report shows some doctors are engaging in the practice and that it should be legalized, but pro-life advocates disagreed.

Julia Millington, political director of the ProLife Alliance, told the BBC, "Surely the response of a civilized society is to stop this unlawful killing altogether rather than use such research to support demands for doctors to be permitted to do it legally."

A doctor associated with the British Medical Association also worried about the number of doctors engaging in euthanasia.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: britain; euthanasia; massmurder; physicians; schiavo; terry; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 01/18/2006 7:34:55 AM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; ...
The culture of death rolls on.

Catholic Ping - Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


2 posted on 01/18/2006 7:35:43 AM PST by NYer (Discover the beauty of the Eastern Catholic Churches - freepmail me for more information.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Asian yutes in Britain are on the rampage. Pakistanis?.

Ohhhhhh. Euthanasia. That's different. Nevermind.

3 posted on 01/18/2006 7:37:14 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

"...and 1,930 involved the doctor killing the patient without the patient's consent."

Hippocratic Oath -- Modern Version

I swear to fulfill, to the best of my ability and judgment, this covenant:

I will respect the hard-won scientific gains of those physicians in whose steps I walk, and gladly share such knowledge as is mine with those who are to follow.

I will apply, for the benefit of the sick, all measures which are required, avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism.

I will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science, and that warmth, sympathy, and understanding may outweigh the surgeon's knife or the chemist's drug.

I will not be ashamed to say "I know not," nor will I fail to call in my colleagues when the skills of another are needed for a patient's recovery.

I will respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know. Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty.

***Above all, I must not play at God.***

I will remember that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the person's family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems, if I am to care adequately for the sick.

I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure.

I will remember that I remain a member of society, with special obligations to all my fellow human beings, those sound of mind and body as well as the infirm.

If I do not violate this oath, may I enjoy life and art, respected while I live and remembered with affection thereafter. May I always act so as to preserve the finest traditions of my calling and may I long experience the joy of healing those who seek my help.


Written in 1964 by Louis Lasagna, Academic Dean of the School of Medicine at Tufts University, and used in many medical schools today.


4 posted on 01/18/2006 7:41:34 AM PST by Nihil Obstat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Ray Allen , worn out ,half blind executed for killing 4 people. It took over 20 years to get rid of this POS , Oh, Thats horribl, but its ok to deny care "in the best interest of the patient.

A little hard to understand their logic.


5 posted on 01/18/2006 7:41:50 AM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
I don't believe the right to die movement is in any way about respecting the individual's choice. If it was they'd be pushing FIRST for allowing doctors to use heroin, cocaine or some other drug to alleviate suffering. Wouldn't most people choose being drugged and comfortable and at peace over death?

This is ONLY about getting rid of useless expensive people.

6 posted on 01/18/2006 7:42:22 AM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

"1,930 involved the doctor killing the patient without the patient's consent"
I believe thats called: MURDER.


7 posted on 01/18/2006 7:43:11 AM PST by DesignerChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Good for 'em.

Doctors in this country have been doing it for years, too. I hope if I am suffering and have no chance for recovery that someone cares enough to slip me some extra morphine.

parsy, who don't want to linger in agony.


8 posted on 01/18/2006 7:44:07 AM PST by parsifal ("Knock and ye shall receive!" (The Bible, somewhere.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Look at the bright side, the legalization of assisted suicide will help eliminate liberals, even though the democrats will still have them voting from the grave.


9 posted on 01/18/2006 7:44:28 AM PST by MAD-AS-HELL (Put a mirror to the face of the republican party and all you'll see is a Donkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

"...1,930 involved the doctor killing the patient without the patient's consent."

I call that murder.


10 posted on 01/18/2006 7:47:10 AM PST by socialismisinsidious (Liberals are all about choice UNTIL you choose differently than them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I am suspicious of the statement that, "1,930 involved the doctor killing the patient without the patient's consent." What does that mean exactly? Does that include people who were brain dead or otherwise incapacitated and their family members authorized euthenasia? This article is obviously from one side of the issue and that statement seems worded in a very particular way.


11 posted on 01/18/2006 7:52:00 AM PST by h8in08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

I can tell you that I, my wife and virtually all of our family members on both sides would prefer an easy death over living a fruitless existence in a drug induced coma.


12 posted on 01/18/2006 7:56:59 AM PST by h8in08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NYer
--the doctor who put George V down a little early so the news would be in the London Times rather than the tabloids must have started something--
13 posted on 01/18/2006 7:59:03 AM PST by rellimpank (Don't believe anything about firearms or explosives stated by the mass media---NRABenefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: parsifal

I agree with you, but get ready for the flames from the FR busybodies!


14 posted on 01/18/2006 8:01:40 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

I can take the heat.

parsy, who wears flame-resistant aluminum foil in his hat.


15 posted on 01/18/2006 8:04:54 AM PST by parsifal ("Knock and ye shall receive!" (The Bible, somewhere.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nihil Obstat

compare that to the older verison:

I swear by God, to keep according to my ability and my judgement, the following Oath.

"To consider dear to me as my parents him who taught me this art; to live in common with him and if necessary to share my goods with him; To look upon his children as my own brothers, to teach them this art if they so desire without fee or written promise; to impart to my sons and the sons of the master who taught me and the disciples who have enrolled themselves and have agreed to the rules of the profession, but to these alone the precepts and the instruction.

I will prescribe regimens for the good of my patients according to my ability and my judgment and never do harm to anyone.

To please no one will I prescribe a deadly drug nor give advice which may cause his death.

Nor will I give a woman a pessary to procure abortion.

But I will preserve the purity of my life and my art.

I will not cut for stone, even for patients in whom the disease is manifest; I will leave this operation to be performed by practitioners, specialists in this art.

In every house where I come I will enter only for the good of my patients, keeping myself far from all intentional ill-doing and all seduction and especially from the pleasures of love with women or with men, be they free or slaves.

All that may come to my knowledge in the exercise of my profession or in daily commerce with men, which ought not to be spread abroad, I will keep secret and will never reveal.

If I keep this oath faithfully, may I enjoy my life and practice my art, respected by all men and in all times; but if I swerve from it or violate it, may the reverse be my lot."


16 posted on 01/18/2006 8:05:28 AM PST by Nihil Obstat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Yeppers those progressive Euro weenies sure know how to make steer their cultures back to the future...


17 posted on 01/18/2006 8:32:24 AM PST by joesnuffy (A camel once bit our sister.. but we knew what to do.. we gathered rocks and squashed her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: parsifal
Good for 'em.

You think it is a good thing to euthanize someone without their consent?

18 posted on 01/18/2006 8:42:32 AM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Why use doctors? Killing patients is not their calling, but healing. Why not just use undertakers....more up their alley and it's more efficient.

i.e. Living Wills can just specify "...and when I reach my 70th birthday, Slippery Slopes Mortuary will come and take me away and...."


19 posted on 01/18/2006 9:32:52 AM PST by OldArmy52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I would understand if they were British dentists, but not doctors.


20 posted on 01/18/2006 9:48:06 AM PST by kaboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson