Skip to comments.
Syria Backs Nuclear Iran
The Telegraph (UK) ^
| 1-20-2006
| Patrick Bishop
Posted on 01/19/2006 6:23:57 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-129 next last
1
posted on
01/19/2006 6:23:59 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
I'm sure they do. Chances are their backing ain't gonna pay off.
2
posted on
01/19/2006 6:27:10 PM PST
by
pissant
To: blam
We needed a MOAB over Syria's Presidential Palace today, I'm quite serious. We should have grabbed the opportunity to wipe out a good portion of both of these terrorist cabals and then finished the job with extensive strikes all over Iran, Syria, and the Bekka Valley.
3
posted on
01/19/2006 6:27:26 PM PST
by
Enchante
(Democrats: "We are ALL broken and worn out, our party & ideas, what else is new?")
To: blam
4
posted on
01/19/2006 6:27:44 PM PST
by
wizardoz
To: blam
Noooo! You don't say?
I'm betting that one day after Iran has the bomb, Syria has the bomb, then Libya, Somalia, etc.
5
posted on
01/19/2006 6:28:46 PM PST
by
Brilliant
To: blam
Well knock me over with a feather. Sure didn't see this coming.
6
posted on
01/19/2006 6:29:07 PM PST
by
teenyelliott
(Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
To: blam
Well, Surprise, Suprise, Suprise.
Sign Syria up officially for the axis of evil [and potential Crusade].
7
posted on
01/19/2006 6:29:29 PM PST
by
Paladin2
(If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
To: wizardoz
Since WMD's were relocated from Iraq to Syria they have a lot of parts Iran needs. DUH
8
posted on
01/19/2006 6:31:21 PM PST
by
Westlander
(Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
To: blam
Syria yesterday backed Iran in its nuclear confrontation with the West as their leaders met in Damascus in a defiant show of solidarity abject stupidity.
Are there any doubts about where this is headed anymore, by anyone? When do we start the pool? I want May 1st and Iran for $1,000.
9
posted on
01/19/2006 6:32:21 PM PST
by
DoNotDivide
(Ask the Lord to make Himself real to you and receive His love today, while you still can!)
To: blam
Well that makes three supporting Iran's bomb: the leader of Iran, the leader of Syria and pat buchanan.
10
posted on
01/19/2006 6:32:49 PM PST
by
CWOJackson
(tancredo? Wasn't he the bounty hunter in the Star Wars trilogy?)
To: Enchante
Yes, because the Iraq War isn't quite enough for you.
11
posted on
01/19/2006 6:33:40 PM PST
by
Lejes Rimul
(I was right about Iraq all along. Told you so.)
To: blam
Of course they'll support Iran because Iran's future nukes will make Syria's regime unshakable too. Look at the respect nutty Kim Jong-Il gets and young Assad so desperately craves.
12
posted on
01/19/2006 6:35:10 PM PST
by
Lejes Rimul
(I was right about Iraq all along. Told you so.)
To: blam
I just saw another Freeper say on a different thread "Is there a "no sh*t Sherlock" ping list? It seems to fit here too.
13
posted on
01/19/2006 6:35:26 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
To: blam
target them when they get together like this...
14
posted on
01/19/2006 6:35:32 PM PST
by
injin
To: Lejes Rimul
You are either with us or with the terrorists.
Thanks for making it clear whose side of this World War you choose.
15
posted on
01/19/2006 6:35:51 PM PST
by
DoNotDivide
(Ask the Lord to make Himself real to you and receive His love today, while you still can!)
To: CWOJackson
I wonder which Iranian mullah OBL is sleeping with.
16
posted on
01/19/2006 6:37:56 PM PST
by
DoNotDivide
(Ask the Lord to make Himself real to you and receive His love today, while you still can!)
To: DoNotDivide
I love America enough to warn that the Iraq War is a needless diversion while true threats to our great republic prepare themselves for the coming anarchy. If you want America to send even more troops to occupy a hostile Middle East, then you clearly don't love America as much as you like to think you do.
17
posted on
01/19/2006 6:42:55 PM PST
by
Lejes Rimul
(I was right about Iraq all along. Told you so.)
To: Lejes Rimul
No, you're right, it's not. That's not because I in any way desire any war, ever, but because I recognize that until the terrorist regimes in Damascus and Tehran are removed, we are very far from the end of the War on Terror. We have to achieve "regime change" in Syria and Iran to even begin to hope for a resolution of the problem of Islamo-fascist terrorism. To paraphrase Churchill, the Iraq War is not the end or the beginning of the end, but perhaps the end of the beginning. If you don't like to hear that, maybe it's because you are like most our our Democratic Party and the EU, and you hope that we make nice and roll over and hope that the terrorists will be nice to us.
18
posted on
01/19/2006 6:47:25 PM PST
by
Enchante
(Democrats: "We are ALL broken and worn out, our party & ideas, what else is new?")
To: Lejes Rimul
Hogwash. Iran was the ultimate target when Afghanistan and Iraq were put in play.
If you don't understand that, you aren't paying attention.
19
posted on
01/19/2006 6:47:25 PM PST
by
DoNotDivide
(Ask the Lord to make Himself real to you and receive His love today, while you still can!)
To: blam
"Damascus a ruinous heap."
20
posted on
01/19/2006 6:48:08 PM PST
by
OKSooner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-129 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson