Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tapping Missouriís Crude Oil Economy: an unknown amount with a lucrative potential
The Columbia Missourian ^ | December 2005 | JACOB LUECKE

Posted on 01/20/2006 12:03:59 PM PST by rface

VERNON COUNTY (Missouri) — In a flat, grassy prairie 200 miles southwest of Columbia, oil pumps teeter day and night, extracting hundreds of gallons of water beaded with tiny globs of crude oil.

A couple hundred feet below these pumps and the nearby farms and small towns in this rural corner of Missouri, there are millions, possibly billions, of barrels of heavy crude oil.

Yet there are only a few working oil pumps in Vernon County, where experts say the state’s largest oil deposits lie.

For decades, companies such as Carmel Energy, which owns the pumps, have been trying to harvest oil from Vernon County. But the area’s most noted natural resource remains the wild pecans advertised on billboards along Highway 71.

Missouri is not known as an oil-producing state, and there are distinct disadvantages to drilling for oil. Nonetheless, Carmel Energy’s pumps won’t be alone for long. Today’s high oil prices are attracting more oil companies to Missouri and the conditions might even be right for an oil boom. Through the years

Historically, Missouri’s oil production has risen after a jump in oil prices.

The last time that happened was nearly 25 years ago.

For much of the 1970s, oil prices were less than $10 a barrel. Companies produced only about 60,000 barrels of oil per year from Missouri.

But when oil prices soared, reaching $20 a barrel in 1980 and then $30 a barrel a year later, investment groups poured into Vernon County, hoping to cash in by selling the heavy, tar-like oil at premium prices.

This mini-oil boom peaked in 1984, when companies produced 286,000 barrels of Missouri crude but ended abruptly just two years later when oil prices crashed below $10 a barrel. Investors were burned, and some companies that spent heavily in Vernon County went under before they could even begin production.


How much Missouri oil is there?
287 million barrels, according to a DNR report from 1977. An earlier estimate put the amount at 75 billion barrels in western Missouri, eastern Kansas and northeastern Oklahoma.

Between 1.4 billion and 8.3 billion barrels, according to Bruce Netzler, the state’s former oil and gas geologist.

In 10 years, the state would use up 1.4 billion barrels at its current rate of consumption, according to the federal Department of Energy.

How much can Missouri produce? 5,000 barrels per day, estimates Shari Dunn-Norman, an associate professor of petroleum engineering.

20,000 barrels per day, says Jim Long, a mining engineer who has been drilling test wells in Vernon County.

In 1984, Missouri averaged 784 barrels of oil per day.

The skeletons of these failed projects are scattered along Vernon County’s back roads. Rusty oil storage tanks and battered boiler sheds sit beside livestock pastures. Farmers plant their crops around capped oil wells in the middle of their fields.

But there are signs that these skeletons might soon come back to life.

The oil price jumps during the past three years are similar to the increases in the 1980s. The average price of a barrel of oil went from $28 in 2003 to $37 in 2004. On Wednesday, oil was selling for more than $55 a barrel.

Once again, companies are taking a look at Vernon County.

“The investment groups are very actively seeking to re-enter western Missouri,” said Shari Dunn-Norman, an associate professor of petroleum engineering at the University of Missouri-Rolla and a member of the state’s Oil and Gas Council.

Dunn-Norman said she has been getting more calls recently from companies wanting to drill for oil.

It’s no wonder. In a 1990 report, Bruce Netzler, a geologist for the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, said Missouri’s oil was worth between $14 billion and $85 billion. With today’s higher oil prices, the oil is likely worth much more.

“There are billions of dollars worth of oil here,” Netzler said, calling Missouri’s oil fields a “vast resource.”

But for Missouri to go back to the boom days in the early 1980s, or perhaps produce on an even larger scale, companies will have to overcome several hurdles that have tripped up projects in the past:

* The oil in southwest Missouri has not been extensively mapped, meaning there’s a lot of speculation and guesswork when drilling. * ­ Missouri’s mineral-rights laws can discourage drilling. * The oil is thick and difficult to produce in large quantities. * Missouri’s oil infrastructure collapsed when oil prices crashed in the mid-1980s.

The lure of untapped oil and high profits might be enough to spur a new oil industry here.

“The oil is out there,” said Jeff Jaquess, the DNR’s oil and gas geologist. “Hopefully, now, with the prices the way they are, we’ll see it starting to pick back up.” Crude estimates

No one knows how much oil is under southwest Missouri, but there have been many educated guesses.

A DNR report from 1977 estimated 287 million barrels. An earlier estimate put the amount at 75 billion barrels in western Missouri, eastern Kansas and northeastern Oklahoma. Netzler, the state’s former oil and gas geologist, said in his report there could be between 1.4 billion and 8.3 billion barrels under western Missouri.

At the state’s current oil consumption rate, even 1.4 billion barrels would last Missouri more than 10 years, according to the federal Department of Energy.

Since Missouri’s oil resource has not been precisely quantified by the state or private companies, it’s difficult to predict how much crude oil companies would be able to produce.

Dunn-Norman said she thinks the state could produce at least 5,000 barrels a day, which would easily top the 1984 production record.

Jim Long is much more optimistic. Long, a mining engineer, has been drilling test wells for a landowner with 4,700 acres in Vernon County.

From his tests, Long thinks the state could be producing 20,000 barrels of oil per day, and he said that’s his conservative estimate.

That much oil production would far surpass anything Missouri has ever produced.

Missouri is 29th in production out of 31 states that have oil production, according to the energy department. But if Long’s estimates are correct, the state could jump to somewhere in the middle, near neighboring states Illinois (11 million barrels per year) and Arkansas (7 million barrels per year).

The distance between Dunn-Norman and Long’s estimates underlines the fact that considerable uncertainty remains about the extent of the oil under western Missouri.

The state is partially to blame for this lack of information.

In his 1990 report, Netzler said the state should research and better quantify its crude oil resources so companies would have the information they need to quickly restart production.

But Netzler said that hasn’t happened. Instead, he said, the state does more regulation than promotion of its oil. He said the state could be doing a lot more to help companies that want to drill here.

“We could package the data that is in existence and have a drilling program to go out and core drill and find out what’s there,” he said. “We could find the limits of the oil and put it in a report that’s open for everybody.”

Some states do much more to help oil companies. Kansas, for example, has a wealth of information on the state’s geological survey Web site including detailed interactive electronic maps of Kansas oil fields.

The Missouri DNR’s Web site, on the other hand, offers little more than the drilling laws and a downloadable “fact sheet” with a brief history of oil production.

The document isn’t likely to stir interest in drilling for oil in Missouri as it includes the statement, “Missouri does not boast of large, undeveloped deposits of oil and gas, but exploration and speculation continue.” Mineral rights

Finding out where the oil is and how much is there is only one part of the process. Gaining the right to drill an oil well in Missouri can be a legal tangle.

“The mineral interest laws in this state do not promote any kind of production whatsoever,” Dunn-Norman said.

When land is sold in Missouri, the seller can choose to sell only the surface and retain ownership of the minerals underneath the property.

On some property in western Missouri, mineral ownership was split from the land above it long ago. These mineral rights were handed down from parents to children for several generations until the mineral rights for a single piece of property were split between dozens of relatives.

This situation becomes a problem when a company wants to acquire a lease to drill for oil on these properties because it has to find every relative with mineral rights.

Long said divided mineral rights are common in Vernon County.

“You have a lot of acreage down in this part of the world with split mineral ownership,” he said. “Big, big blocks of land are not readily available down here.”

Dunn-Norman said Missouri could enact a more drilling-friendly mineral rights law similar to the laws in other oil-producing states, such as Oklahoma and Louisiana. In those states, if the mineral-rights owner is not actively developing the underground resources, the rights are automatically reattached to the surface after several years.

Then, companies who come in seeking a drilling lease only need to get permission from the surface owner, rather than potentially dozens of mineral rights owners who might not even know they own mineral rights in rural southwestern Missouri.

There has not been a strong push to change Missouri’s mineral rights laws. Dunn-Norman said the state legislature should consider such a change because the hassle of acquiring mineral rights is a disincentive for companies that might want to drill in Missouri. Ornery oil

Even when the legal red tape is cleared away, prospectors in southwest Missouri have found that the tar-like oil there will only come out under its own demanding terms. Much of the oil has two characteristics that make it particularly difficult to get out of the ground: It’s shallow and extremely thick.

The oil in Vernon County is a couple hundred feet deep, versus thousands of feet deep for a typical oil reservoir. While this might seem like an advantage, in oil drilling, deeper reservoirs are better.

When oil is deeper, formation pressure naturally pushes the oil to the surface when it’s tapped by a well. With shallow deposits, prospectors have to use other methods to get the oil to flow from the rock and then use pumps to lift it to the surface.

Creative prospectors tried some unusual methods to get Missouri’s ornery oil flowing. In his report, Netzler describes some of the tests.

He writes that in one ill-fated attempt, a prospector tried to get the oil moving by blasting jet engine exhaust down a well hole. Another group thought jolting the oil with an electrical current might loosen it up, but Netzler writes that they ended up with only a hefty electric bill.

One method that has been successful in Missouri is called steam injection. Using this process, oil prospectors push steam down a well to heat the oil and build pressure, making it easier to pump. But steam injection is costly because operators need a fuel, typically natural gas or their own oil, to boil the water. Thus, steam injection is really only economical when oil prices are high.

These strategies hint at the fact that there hasn’t been much research money poured into developing the oil in Missouri. Most of the research on pumping oil in Missouri has been done by individuals or small companies that don’t have large budgets for research and development.

Larger companies generally spend their research money overseas, where oil is easier to harvest and there is greater potential for big profits, according to testimony earlier this year in front of the U.S. Senate Energy and Water Subcommittee.

Federal funding for petroleum research has helped compensate for the lack of private funding in Missouri.

For example, Dunn-Norman recently conducted research in Vernon County to find out if dropping microbes into oil reservoirs would reduce oil viscosity and get the oil flowing. She said the test results weren’t promising.

About half of the $1.3 million in funding for the study came from the federal Department of Energy. But even federal funding for research projects in places like Missouri is on shaky ground. President Bush’s proposed budget for 2006 eliminated funding for domestic oil research. The energy and water subcommittee later restored the funding after hearing an outcry from the research community.

All the disappointing tests haven’t stopped people from trying new ideas in southwest Missouri.

Carmel Energy, which operates the pumps in Vernon County, is shooting microwaves into the ground to get the oil to flow on its small project site.

A new out-of-state investment group plans to revisit steam injection in Vernon County, but the investors plan to use a cheaper, regional fuel source such as hay, corn or coal to heat the water.

Another technology that might have an impact here comes from Phoenix-based Deluge Inc.’s CEO Brian Hageman, who spent nine years inventing and testing a new type of engine. This year, Deluge started using the engine to pump oil in Parsons, Kan., just west of the Missouri-Kansas border.

Hageman said his engine can pump oil at a tenth of the cost of traditional pumps. So far, Deluge has nine pumps running in Parsons, but Hageman expects to install about 4,500 pumps in the next five years across the Midwest.

Hageman said he wants to exploit what he see as an open market in the generally neglected oil fields in places such as Missouri.

“We’re not trying to compete with the big oil guys with the bigger fields. We’re going into these older, shallow, small fields that no one else is working,” he said. “We see it as a huge opportunity for us to extract oil out of these fields that nobody else wants to mess with.” Extra costs

Even with today’s high oil prices, the extra costs of producing oil in Missouri can pinch a company’s profits.

There are no crude oil refineries in Missouri, and companies have to pay to truck their oil to refineries in other states.

Colt Energy, which produces oil in the Kansas City area, pays $6 to $7 a barrel to truck its oil to a refinery in Coffeyville, Kan.

“We’re not getting the full increase because our costs have gone up, and that squeezes our margins,” said Nick Powell, president of Colt Energy. “So yes, we’re making a lot more money, but we’re not making as much money as one might think.”

Finding replacement parts for broken oil rigs also can be a hassle. Right now, it can take months to get parts imported for broken pumps. Higher oil prices have caused a renewed interest in pumping oil around the world and equipment suppliers are swamped with orders.

“A few years ago you could go out to any junk yard and get the old pumps,” Hageman said. “Right now, it takes months to get new above-ground equipment for an oil well.”

Colt Energy, has to order parts from as far away as Asia, said Colt engineer John Amerman.

“Just to get some oil wells pumping, we have to get supplies shipped from China, and some of those supplies have a six-month waiting time,” he said.

The state had an infrastructure to support an oil industry in the 1980s, but when prices went down and production decreased, these companies were forced out of business.

“In the ’80s, a lot of those left and never came back,” Amerman said. “So there’s a limited amount of supplies and service companies.”

In addition, companies coming to Missouri will have to compete for experienced oil workers, who are in short supply in the state.

Dunn-Norman is trying to help fill the need for more petroleum engineers in Missouri by recruiting more prospective engineers into UMR’s petroleum engineering program. But even with starting salaries in the $70,000 range for a petroleum engineer, she is only expecting modest growth in enrollment. Just getting started

After decades of trying and a lot of frustration, only a small portion of Missouri’s oil has been harvested.

Since the state started tracking oil production in 1966, only 4.5 million barrels have been taken from the state. That leaves hundreds of millions, possibly billions, of barrels of oil under western Missouri.

“There’s some pretty good size heavy-oil reserves, and that’s a potential growth area in the state of Missouri,” Powell said.

With so much oil, and so much money left to be made, companies seem destined to find a way to make Missouri’s oil profitable. When that happens, even those who don’t own property in southwest Missouri could see a benefit from greater oil production. Having companies harvesting and selling oil could bring in tens of millions of dollars in tax revenue for the state, Dunn-Norman said.

“The average Missourian could say, ‘Well, it may not be that much in my pocket, but if it keeps taxes lower, it’s a great benefit,’” she said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: oil
I am going to pass this along to my Representative.
1 posted on 01/20/2006 12:04:01 PM PST by rface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Oil & Natural Gas Production in Your State
2 posted on 01/20/2006 12:06:44 PM PST by rface ("...the most schizoid freeper I've ever seen" - New Bloomfield, Missouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

I am originally from that area and had no idea there might be oil there! Coal and sulfer yes. I guess with all the coal and asphalt ground it shouldn't be such a far reach.


3 posted on 01/20/2006 12:46:01 PM PST by Mrs. Shawnlaw (Rock beats scissors, don't run with rocks. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson