Skip to comments.
JAG temporarily banned Army and Marine Corps snipers from using a highly accurate open-tip bullet.
Washington Times ^
| Jan 20, 2006
| Bill Gertz, Rowan Scarborough
Posted on 01/22/2006 2:35:38 PM PST by radar101
JAG, we are told, mistakenly thought the open-tip round was the same as hollow-point ammunition, which is banned. The original open-tip was known as Sierra MatchKing and broke all records for accuracy in the past 30 years. The difference between the open-tip and the hollow point is that the open tip is a design feature that improves accuracy while the hollow point is designed for increasing damage when it hits a target. About 10 days ago, the Army JAG in Iraq ordered all snipers to stop using the open-tip 175-grain M118LR bullet, claiming, falsely, it was prohibited. Instead of the open-tip, snipers were forced to take M-60 machine gun rounds out of belts and use them instead.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ammo; ammunition; anamericansoldier; armysnipers; bang; banglist; gertz; hollowpoints; iraq; jag; leagalweenies; legalweenies; military; oif; rowanscarborough; shakespearewasright; shysters; sniper; terrorwar; thanksjagoff; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-112 next last
1
posted on
01/22/2006 2:35:42 PM PST
by
radar101
To: radar101
Kinder, gentler, ammunition...........
2
posted on
01/22/2006 2:37:30 PM PST
by
mosquewatch.com
("The enemy is anyone who will get you killed, no matter what side they are on.")
To: radar101
It's ok to kill them as long as it doesn't hurt them too bad.
To: radar101
Well, as long as the "insurgents" are adhering to the rules
so should we.
/sarcasm
4
posted on
01/22/2006 2:38:55 PM PST
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: radar101
Lawyers. Is there any other tribe so ignorant?
5
posted on
01/22/2006 2:39:49 PM PST
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: radar101
awww... you left out the best part. After Army lawyers were finally alerted to the JAG's action, the order was lifted and the JAG was notified that the open tip was perfectly legal for use by snipers.
6
posted on
01/22/2006 2:40:42 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: radar101
I don't care about this, as long as no panties were used in the process.
7
posted on
01/22/2006 2:41:26 PM PST
by
neodad
(Rule Number 1: Be Armed)
To: radar101
God save us from lawfare ...
8
posted on
01/22/2006 2:41:37 PM PST
by
John Jorsett
(scam never sleeps)
To: radar101
Remarkably ignorant mistake for a military lawyer. Sounds like someone was shooting form the hip.
9
posted on
01/22/2006 2:43:59 PM PST
by
atomicpossum
(Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
To: radar101
Just wait until they find out about dipping them in pig blood first! Oink..;-)
To: SandRat
11
posted on
01/22/2006 2:46:14 PM PST
by
DTogo
(I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
To: Normal4me
12
posted on
01/22/2006 2:46:59 PM PST
by
mosquewatch.com
("The enemy is anyone who will get you killed, no matter what side they are on.")
To: radar101
13
posted on
01/22/2006 2:48:06 PM PST
by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
To: radar101
However, the reversal was followed by the Army officials' taking retaliation against a sniper who blew the whistle on the bogus order. The sniper lost his job over a security infraction in reporting the JAG. He must have bypassed his chain-of-command. I am sure he knew the consequences of his actions....good on him.
14
posted on
01/22/2006 2:48:40 PM PST
by
SC Swamp Fox
(Bush lied, people dyed....their fingers.)
To: radar101
The blood sucking attorneys are destroying this nation.
15
posted on
01/22/2006 2:48:42 PM PST
by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: atomicpossum
He didn't have the funds to hire an expert witness to tell him what he wanted to hear so he winged it on his own and screwed the pooch again.
16
posted on
01/22/2006 2:49:00 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
To: radar101
So is JAG on the side of the terrorists now...?
To: radar101
I guess they could use air soft
18
posted on
01/22/2006 2:53:10 PM PST
by
Steveone
(Liberalism is a brain tumor!)
To: atomicpossum
What's interesting is not only that the JAG has absolutely no combat infantry experience (being a woman) and that she issued an order without the authority to do so, but that the soldier who blew the whistle on her was disciplined for doing so.
To: radar101
Simple solution.
Simply rename and renumber it.
They'll fall for it. Lawyers are like that, yes they are.
I wonder what kind of "rules" they have for hand-to-hand combat?
To: radar101
Our snipers should be using napalm from 2000 feet
21
posted on
01/22/2006 2:54:04 PM PST
by
Porterville
(Keep your communism off my paycheck)
To: radar101
Again, the buck has to stop somewhere. Who was untimately responsible for this ignorant stupid ruling?
I want to know a name, and the date of his or her discharge or firing!
22
posted on
01/22/2006 2:54:46 PM PST
by
Publius6961
(The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
To: neodad
I don't care about this, as long as no panties were used in the process.The only panties were on the JAG.
To: Sir Gawain
Hollow points were banned by a Geneva Convention treaty long ago because of the damage they cause. Sharp edged bayonets are banned for the same reason they can have a sharp point but the edge must be blunt. Fortunately the bayonet issue is known by few people so that issue doesnt come up.
I personally think the hollow point is more humane let the guy bleed out instead of suffering.
24
posted on
01/22/2006 2:58:35 PM PST
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: SC Swamp Fox
The sniper lost his job over a security infraction in reporting the JAG.Now, if only someone would share the name of the JAG with us...
Isn't this a truly qualified case of "whistleblowing" being punished?
There in clearly no classified material involved...
Just criminal incompetence.
25
posted on
01/22/2006 2:58:48 PM PST
by
Publius6961
(The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
To: radar101
"She forced snipers to use less accurate ammunition, thereby placing U.S. forces and Iraqi civilians at greater risk," a Pentagon official said of the JAG, who was not identified by name. "And she incorrectly issued an order. JAGs may advise a commander, but they cannot issue orders."
After Army lawyers were finally alerted to the JAG's action, the order was lifted and the JAG was notified that the open tip was perfectly legal for use by snipers. However, the reversal was followed by the Army officials' taking retaliation against a sniper who blew the whistle on the bogus order. The sniper lost his job over a security infraction in reporting the JAG
26
posted on
01/22/2006 2:59:56 PM PST
by
stylin19a
(God does not apply to your alloted time, the hours spent playing golf.)
To: Publius6961
We want a name and to make sure she goes into promoting abortion, where she belongs!
27
posted on
01/22/2006 3:00:27 PM PST
by
Publius6961
(The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
To: Publius6961
According to the article "she" gave the (illegal) order. They fired the whistle blower. How about restating him and firing her for exceeding her authority. Not to mention for incompetence, you'd expect a JAG to know the rules on who can and who cannot issue orders!
To: radar101
The M118LR bullet is so accurate, it can remove your ear at 1500 meters. The M60 hollow point, on the other hand, is not as accurate but will remove your head along with your ear.
29
posted on
01/22/2006 3:05:32 PM PST
by
RTINSC
(There is no guarantee of Success but Failure is guaranteed if you are not successful..)
To: Publius6961
"..Again, the buck has to stop somewhere. Who was untimately responsible for this ignorant stupid ruling? I want to know a name, and the date of his or her discharge or firing!.." The scuttlebutt is that it was Al Gore. You see, he invented the open point round, as well as the sniper scope, and is upset about not receiving royalties because of some silly technicality about verifying the patent.
30
posted on
01/22/2006 3:05:56 PM PST
by
pickrell
(Old dog, new trick...sort of)
To: elkfersupper
"Don't Ask, Don't Tell"(IIRC)
31
posted on
01/22/2006 3:06:50 PM PST
by
xcamel
(Exposing clandestine operations is treason. 13 knots make a noose.)
To: pickrell
"silly technicality about verifying the patent" ROFLMAO Yeah it was Bush he put someone Else's name on them!
32
posted on
01/22/2006 3:10:20 PM PST
by
Steveone
(Liberalism is a brain tumor!)
To: RTINSC
The M118LR bullet is so accurate, it can remove your ear at 1500 meters. The M60 hollow point, on the other hand, is not as accurate but will remove your head along with your ear. Unless it's a hostage situation, what is so wrong with that?
33
posted on
01/22/2006 3:10:23 PM PST
by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(There is an Amber Alert out for my tagline. If you find it, FReepmail me.)
To: RTINSC
My arithmetic is bad ,almost a mile?
Wow!
34
posted on
01/22/2006 3:16:11 PM PST
by
dhouston
Comment #35 Removed by Moderator
To: radar101
The JAG should be brought up on charges of conduct in support of the enemy in time of war. But she never will be because she is a female. Take her commission and throw her out she may be responsible for the death of American military personnel and she is evidently a dumb as#.
36
posted on
01/22/2006 3:17:32 PM PST
by
YOUGOTIT
To: radar101
JAG are a bunch of lefties who get payed for harassing the troops.
37
posted on
01/22/2006 3:17:48 PM PST
by
boomop1
To: K4Harty
Nothing wrong with the M60 IMO.
38
posted on
01/22/2006 3:21:52 PM PST
by
RTINSC
(There is no guarantee of Success but Failure is guaranteed if you are not successful..)
To: radar101
Shoot, shovel, and shut up! If they can't find a body, they can't prove a thing!
39
posted on
01/22/2006 3:22:03 PM PST
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(MAY I DIE ON MY FEET IN MY SWAMP)
To: dhouston
It is my understanding the longest sniper kill with a .50 cal in Iraq was at 2200 meters -1.2 miles!
40
posted on
01/22/2006 3:23:34 PM PST
by
RTINSC
(There is no guarantee of Success but Failure is guaranteed if you are not successful..)
To: RobbyS
Lawyers. Is there any other tribe so ignorant? Yes. The tribe of those who make idiotic generalizations.
41
posted on
01/22/2006 3:24:03 PM PST
by
ericthecurdog
(The chief export of Chuck Norris is pain.)
To: radar101
Don't worry. Harm and Mac will get to the bottom of this!
42
posted on
01/22/2006 3:28:36 PM PST
by
WestVirginiaRebel
(The Democratic Party-Jackass symbol, jackass leaders, jackass supporters.)
To: Publius6961
"Isn't this a truly qualified case of "whistleblowing" being punished?
There in clearly no classified material involved..."
I can't tell whether or not it was, based on the information presented.
I do know there are numerous avenues for "whistleblowing" in every chain of command in the DOD, the IG office being one of the most obvious.
That said, I would very much like to have more information on this incident, and those involved.
Issuing an "illegal order" is not a small thing for an officer, and it just doesn't pass a smell test that it was left to an individual "sniper" to rectify this situation by going outside the chain of command.
Some names are needed before this disappears...
43
posted on
01/22/2006 3:31:11 PM PST
by
sarasmom
To: ericthecurdog
This JAG was most wrong, but pls do not paint all JAG with the same paint. Many Jag are good guys. Just because they are not field troops does not mean that they are the enemy. Remember most of the Army nowadays may not be combat arms, but they are all on the front lines when you have a low intensity situation. No solid front lines no FEBA means anybody can get hit. Even JAGs know this. I agree that the one who shot her mouth off here should have somebody tighten up her shot group (ha) but pls do not think that she's all JAGs. I knew one at Ft Bragg that was combat infantry in Vietnam before law school. (He was not a leg - either). He was a good guy.
Buddha Bless the USA
44
posted on
01/22/2006 3:33:47 PM PST
by
Sangey
(Buddha bless the USA)
To: radar101
Well, sh!t!
Why don't we let the State Department approve all targeting, like they did in VietNam.
Then, we surely will win!
Sarcasm off.
45
posted on
01/22/2006 3:34:07 PM PST
by
Taxman
(So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
To: radar101
And, did you read "The rest of the story?"
The sniper who tipped his CO to the JAG idiotic order got disciplined!
What is that all about?
Good thing I am not serving in the PC military of today. I'd be in the FReaking brig!
46
posted on
01/22/2006 3:35:48 PM PST
by
Taxman
(So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
To: R. Scott
Hague Convention not Geneva and I dont think we signed it and I know no Muslims did...
47
posted on
01/22/2006 3:36:18 PM PST
by
joesnuffy
(A camel once bit our sister.. but we knew what to do.. we gathered rocks and squashed her!)
To: radar101
???
What on earth is this all about? You can shoot a bazooka at the enemy but not hollow point rounds?
To: radar101
175 SMKs are the most accurate 7.62 X 51mm NATO is probably the most accurate round in that particular caliber we use.
Less collateral damage possibility makes it the best round..all around..
imo
49
posted on
01/22/2006 3:38:18 PM PST
by
joesnuffy
(A camel once bit our sister.. but we knew what to do.. we gathered rocks and squashed her!)
To: radar101
Someone deliberately misrepresented the facts to JAG in order to prevent use of the bullets.
This is otherwise known as "aid and comfort to the enemy" aka "treason".
50
posted on
01/22/2006 3:38:57 PM PST
by
an amused spectator
(Bush Runner! The Donkey is after you! Bush Runner! When he catches you, you're through!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-112 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson